**Official Thread** Sanders Supporters Suck

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
The thing that bugs me is that the Russian DNC hacking was so effective on them. These little pantywaists are so bent out of shape about seeing the DNC's dirty laundry in a political campaign and yet they never ask themselves what kind of shit the RnC servers held (which I am quite sure Putin knows and holds over the RNC's head). Anybody who thinks politics is not a cut-throat game is a fool. Me saying this does not in any way condone this as I am sure our three or four Polly-purebred's will accuse me of. I am all in favor for fair and honest campaigns but I am not going to gorge myself on the fruit of the poison tree.

Grow the fuck up! I have no problem with striving to eliminate influence in politics but I know better than to sulk and hand the opposition an election on a silver platter. Talk about not serving your interests... Jebus.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Sanders supporters are generally nice people with a weak grasp on economics and a failure to see the violence they advocate.

However many recognized that Trump and Hillary were both psychotic bozos and the Sanders supporters fell into the false dichotomy trap of thinking that voting for somebody "different" would somehow affect systemic change. It pissed off the whiny neocon Clinton supporters who are more blatant about their advocating for the Hillary beast and world domination, because, "we woulda won....waaaahhh. "

The end.

 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The thing that bugs me is that the Russian DNC hacking was so effective on them. These little pantywaists are so bent out of shape about seeing the DNC's dirty laundry in a political campaign and yet they never ask themselves what kind of shit the RnC servers held (which I am quite sure Putin knows and holds over the RNC's head). Anybody who thinks politics is not a cut-throat game is a fool. Me saying this does not in any way condone this as I am sure our three or four Polly-purebred's will accuse me of. I am all in favor for fair and honest campaigns but I am not going to gorge myself on the fruit of the poison tree.

Grow the fuck up! I have no problem with striving to eliminate influence in politics but I know better than to sulk and hand the opposition an election on a silver platter. Talk about not serving your interests... Jebus.
:cry:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Sanders supporters are generally nice people with a weak grasp on economics and a failure to see the violence they advocate.

However many recognized that Trump and Hillary were both psychotic bozos and the Sanders supporters fell into the false dichotomy trap of thinking that voting for somebody "different" would somehow affect systemic change. It pissed off the whiny neocon Clinton supporters who are more blatant about their advocating for the Hillary beast and world domination, because, "we woulda won....waaaahhh. "

The end.

the only thing more pathetic than the bernie people are the panarchy voluntaryists who advocate for pedophilia and racial segregation.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
the only thing more pathetic than the bernie people are the panarchy voluntaryists who advocate for pedophilia and racial segregation.

I know lots of Bernie people (kind of feel bad for them) but I don't know those other people you mentioned. Friends of yours ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i was describing you. you support pedophilia and racial segregation.

No I don't.

But you support the use of offensive force and a government policy of foreign and domestic aggression.


If you are going to describe me, words like kind, considerate and tolerant of others choices might be more apropos, Poo Poo pants.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No I don't.

But you support the use of offensive force and a government policy of foreign and domestic aggression.


If you are going to describe me, words like kind, considerate and tolerant of others choices might be more apropos, Poo Poo pants.
no, you are a pedophile who said adults having sex with 12 year olds was consensual and you advocate for hanging "no blacks allowed" signs.

these are indisputable facts.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You see the way you framed that implies that I think in the collective like you do. Lucky for me I don't.

You ever get tired of being a shithead? I mean you're really good at it, I was just wondering if you ever took a break ?
do you ever get tired of coming back to a website where you are universally despised for being a pedophile and racial segregationist?
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
do you ever get tired of coming back to a website where you are universally despised for being a pedophile and racial segregationist?
Lets imagine that you have a broom that you made out of bones, is it not your property? Self ownership. Forced interactions. Fake anarchist. Tax is literally slavery. When black people buy stuff it is literally rape.
Screen Shot 2017-11-14 at 8.00.08 AM.png
How many years of that shit now? How many threads derailed? That was all bad enough, then toss in some casual pedophilia...
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Lets imagine that you have a broom that you made out of bones, is it not your property? Self ownership. Forced interactions. Fake anarchist. Tax is literally slavery. When black people buy stuff it is literally rape.
View attachment 4042668
How many years of that shit now? How many threads derailed? That was all bad enough, then toss in some casual pedophilia...

I haven't actually kept track.

As far as your "when black people buy stuff it is literally rape" horseshit allegation, I don't think that at all. Whenever any people, black or white, force an unwilling neutral person to have an interaction with them, that has similarity to rape, since in both instances offensive force is the means used to create the interaction, rather than mutual consent.

Whenever two parties wish to interact, they ought to. Pretty simple stuff there fake anarchist.

A broom made of bones? You been peeking in my windows?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
he can't hear you because he has you on ignore.

you frequently compare a black person shopping at a store to literal rape and slavery you skinhead piece of shit.




I do compare instances of forced associations to other instances of forced associations.

Of course I'd find it just as objectionable if a person of any race forced another person of the same or a different race to serve them or interact with them. You seem to vacillate on that point and think sometimes it's okay for people to force others to serve them. Is that because you are a hypocrite or ignorant ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I do compare instances of forced associations to other instances of forced associations.

Of course I'd find it just as objectionable if a person of any race forced another person of the same or a different race to serve them or interact with them. You seem to vacillate on that point and think sometimes it's okay for people to force others to serve them. Is that because you are a hypocrite or ignorant ?
"can't believe someone forced me to open this store where i have to sell goods and services to black people. it is exactly like rape" - said no one ever you fucking pedophile
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
The thing that bugs me is that the Russian DNC hacking was so effective on them.
What position has any Sanders supporter on RIU or elsewhere been swayed to by Russian propaganda?

Did Russia make Hillary Clinton sellout to Wall Street? Did Russia make her vote in support of the Iraq War? Did Russia make her rig the 2016 Democratic primary?

All Russia did is simply expose what Clinton did behind the scenes. They released information that should have been transparent anyway; that every American who supports democracy should be extremely disappointed with, especially Clinton supporters.

These little pantywaists are so bent out of shape about seeing the DNC's dirty laundry in a political campaign and yet they never ask themselves what kind of shit the RnC servers held (which I am quite sure Putin knows and holds over the RNC's head).
What the RNC may or may not have done is irrelevant to what Clinton and the DNC did do. Saying "Yeah! But they probably cheated TOO!!" is a terrible argument. If the RNC subverted democracy in the Republican primary, they should be held accountable as well. That's what's called consistency.
Anybody who thinks politics is not a cut-throat game is a fool. Me saying this does not in any way condone this as I am sure our three or four Polly-purebred's will accuse me of. I am all in favor for fair and honest campaigns but I am not going to gorge myself on the fruit of the poison tree.
However you perceive politics to be is irrelevant. "It's a cutthroat game so that justifies what the Clinton campaign did. You're just naive for not cheating, too!". No, it doesn't. We told you they were cheating when they were cheating, you are one of the ones that wholeheartedly denied every word of it at the time. So I find it funny the majority of you are coming out now and making these kinds of statements about the kind of cutthroat politics you describe taking place now, then. Why didn't you just make those arguments when we were making the claims instead of deny them outright? When we said Brazile handed Clinton a question during a debate in Michigan, why wasn't your response "Well, cutthroat politics, bro. That's just the way the game is played.."? Instead, it was all denial up until the point it could no longer be denied, then it was "Well, it didn't really matter anyway..".
Grow the fuck up! I have no problem with striving to eliminate influence in politics but I know better than to sulk and hand the opposition an election on a silver platter. Talk about not serving your interests... Jebus.
How do you suppose corporate influence in politics will be eliminated if you keep supporting and electing Democratic politicians who are influenced by corporations?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
"can't believe someone forced me to open this store where i have to sell goods and services to black people. it is exactly like rape" - said no one ever you fucking pedophile

Actually the force would first come into play if a person tried to do business without "permission" from the nanny state.

Can you explain how choosing not to interact with somebody is an activity based in force ?

Are you saying that some people can force a neutral party to interact with them and you're okay with it ? Isn't that what you find objectionable about an actual rapist ?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Actually the force would first come into play if a person tried to do business without "permission" from the nanny state.

Can you explain how choosing not to interact with somebody is an activity based in force ?

Are you saying that some people can force a neutral party to interact with them and you're okay with it ? Isn't that what you find objectionable about an actual rapist ?
"can't believe the government forced me to open this store and makes me comply with food storage and safety regulations. i am a slave" - said no one ever you fucking pedophile
 
Top