Why do Americans want a WW3?

oswizzle

Well-Known Member
Its not the American people who want war..

The evil dual citizens of Israel have contaminated our beautiful country and made it into their puppet...

JEWS run this muthaphucka
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
how can you deny an idea based on a mispelling? seems a bit superficial. fyi, einstein was dyslexic
although you may choose to label this as wrong cuz i didnt punctuate correctly. cheers
I'm dyslexic. Probably didn't notice. I try.
i've seen convoys all the time during peace time. not saying it isn't a mobilization, but just saying i have seen them often during times of no war.
No doubt. It is a common thing.

Its a combination of that and having friends still in.

I hope not.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
that said, we are sending an aircraft carrier and special navy attack force to the korean peninsula as we speak.
yep, just got re routed from its orig destination, Australia.

Also some US govt official carrying on saying N Korea is a threat. Im not sure why as they havent done much in along time except for say words....
 

visajoe1

Well-Known Member
Belive it or not, I could care less.

You think its not coming? Why?

We are due one.
war with a particular country, no i dont think its going to happen. the only country threatening anything is n korea, and that would be funny and sad at the same time if they ever picked a fight with the US.

but, lets take it further. russia? economy in the shitter, very reliant on oil which they are basing off $40 bbl for next couple budget years. they cant afford one if they wanted one. china? they have no beef with us militarily. they would pull some financial shenanigans before going down the road to war. japan? i dont think they want part 2, and their population is shrinking. iran? anything is possible here, but a war would be bad for business and the crooked fucks that run that country fortunately care more about money than fighting religious wars via national military. so they just back their preferred groups from behind the scenes. keep in mind this is another oil based economy where oil isnt worth much now. same with saudi arabia. same in iraq, although more unstable there IMO, but no threat to US in big picture. afghanistan and pakistan are probably the most dangerous to us because of the larger populations of radical islamists and not to mention most of their training grounds are there. syria? thats the million dollar question. i do think there will be more involvement, but to what degree its hard to say i think, not enough development yet since the strikes. however, i dont see an iraq/afghanistan situation in syria with an occupation and hand holding thru elections yadyadayada. i think they just want to prevent assad from using chemical weapons or any other international condemned methods.

it could be argued that US shale oil producers are defending our country more now than the military is by severely handicapping the revenue streams of the countries that could want to harm the US or its citizens. such a complex world.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Its not the American people who want war..

The evil dual citizens of Israel have contaminated our beautiful country and made it into their puppet...

JEWS run this muthaphucka
Oh god damn how so? The big evil jew banks your Congress has oversight on?
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
war with a particular country, no i dont think its going to happen. the only country threatening anything is n korea, and that would be funny and sad at the same time if they ever picked a fight with the US.

but, lets take it further. russia? economy in the shitter, very reliant on oil which they are basing off $40 bbl for next couple budget years. they cant afford one if they wanted one. china? they have no beef with us militarily. they would pull some financial shenanigans before going down the road to war. japan? i dont think they want part 2, and their population is shrinking. iran? anything is possible here, but a war would be bad for business and the crooked fucks that run that country fortunately care more about money than fighting religious wars via national military. so they just back their preferred groups from behind the scenes. keep in mind this is another oil based economy where oil isnt worth much now. same with saudi arabia. same in iraq, although more unstable there IMO, but no threat to US in big picture. afghanistan and pakistan are probably the most dangerous to us because of the larger populations of radical islamists and not to mention most of their training grounds are there. syria? thats the million dollar question. i do think there will be more involvement, but to what degree its hard to say i think, not enough development yet since the strikes. however, i dont see an iraq/afghanistan situation in syria with an occupation and hand holding thru elections yadyadayada. i think they just want to prevent assad from using chemical weapons or any other international condemned methods.

it could be argued that US shale oil producers are defending our country more now than the military is by severely handicapping the revenue streams of the countries that could want to harm the US or its citizens. such a complex world.
The county threatening everyone seems to be the same one that has been for the last 50 years..America.

Its like a game show "who will they pick a fight with next?"
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Correct.. our Jewish Congress and Senate
House and Senate make Congress so there's that. You vote for them, they place the purse in the banks hands in 1913 hot off of Jekyll island.

Did you vote for Congress people who know what a dollar is? See it's our fault. We the people who may or may not be jews, doesn't matter.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Ive noticed allot of ramping up in the last 6 months of Social media propaganda talking about and supporting a WW3.
This only seems to be coming from my American FB contacts and no one else. Things like this:

With the banner. Lets have a look at the sides for WW3.



Why do you lot want a WW3? Why do you want to start a war with China? Whats wrong with you guys, carnt you just live life without creating conflicts everywhere?
We've got a military industrial complex to justify and use!

$1.5 TRILLION for the F35!
BILLIONS for new carrier groups!

Besides, everyone know that wars stimulate economies... right?

Much easier to murder some foreigners over trumped up nonsense- pun intended- than to deal with runaway income and wealth inequality, the consequences of which drove us into the Great Crash of 1929 and the resultant Great Depression.

There now, don't you feel better?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
yep, just got re routed from its orig destination, Australia.

Also some US govt official carrying on saying N Korea is a threat. Im not sure why as they havent done much in along time except for say words....
They've tossed the odd rocket into the sea lately.

That's plenty!
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
war with a particular country, no i dont think its going to happen. the only country threatening anything is n korea, and that would be funny and sad at the same time if they ever picked a fight with the US.

but, lets take it further. russia? economy in the shitter, very reliant on oil which they are basing off $40 bbl for next couple budget years. they cant afford one if they wanted one. china? they have no beef with us militarily. they would pull some financial shenanigans before going down the road to war. japan? i dont think they want part 2, and their population is shrinking. iran? anything is possible here, but a war would be bad for business and the crooked fucks that run that country fortunately care more about money than fighting religious wars via national military. so they just back their preferred groups from behind the scenes. keep in mind this is another oil based economy where oil isnt worth much now. same with saudi arabia. same in iraq, although more unstable there IMO, but no threat to US in big picture. afghanistan and pakistan are probably the most dangerous to us because of the larger populations of radical islamists and not to mention most of their training grounds are there. syria? thats the million dollar question. i do think there will be more involvement, but to what degree its hard to say i think, not enough development yet since the strikes. however, i dont see an iraq/afghanistan situation in syria with an occupation and hand holding thru elections yadyadayada. i think they just want to prevent assad from using chemical weapons or any other international condemned methods.

it could be argued that US shale oil producers are defending our country more now than the military is by severely handicapping the revenue streams of the countries that could want to harm the US or its citizens. such a complex world.
Crawl back under your rock. You have absolutely nothing useful to add to this discussion.
 
Top