Muslim Suing "no-Muslim" Gun Range

[Rrog]

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/army-reservist-sues-muslim-free-gun-range-after-alledgedly-being-n520806

I hope they get the shit sued out of them. And then their Cakes-For-Christ bakery, too.

 

[sonson176]

Scumbaggery at its finest. Sounds like some radical white trash power shit.

 

[NLXSK1]

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/army-reservist-sues-muslim-free-gun-range-after-alledgedly-being-n520806

I hope they get the shit sued out of them. And then their Cakes-For-Christ bakery, too.

Here is the issue I have with this.

He entered the gun store and filled out the form. If he would have kept his damn mouth shut about his race there never would have been an issue.

But he was there to cause shit, not to shoot since he pointed it out after signing the liability waiver.

I am going to believe the gun store owners when they say he was belligerant. Why? Because unless we have camera footage then there is no way we can be sure otherwise. And if the government has now decided to force gun range owners to allow belligerent muslims on their shooting ranges then we are far beyond sanity....

 

[Rrog]

Scumbaggery at its finest. Sounds like some radical white trash power shit.

'zactly

 

[red w. blue]

Here is the issue I have with this.

He entered the gun store and filled out the form. If he would have kept his damn mouth shut about his race there never would have been an issue.

But he was there to cause shit, not to shoot since he pointed it out after signing the liability waiver.

I am going to believe the gun store owners when they say he was belligerant. Why? Because unless we have camera footage then there is no way we can be sure otherwise. And if the government has now decided to force gun range owners to allow belligerent muslims on their shooting ranges then we are far beyond sanity....

Muslim is not a race. I would say let him on the range moving targets are more fun and if he was belligerent on the range it would a self solving problem.

 

[vostok]

just as you will sell your bud to whoever you want,

so can the gun range owner can decide who his customers are

but yeah religion bias ain't cool

the owners ..all had to say it was busy!

but the nig has got to say times against him

and will he get his 25 virgin once he mets Allah?

...lets find out

That said I'm driving my babe home at 5am

and theres a raghead in the middle of the road

he refuses to move, I drive 'round him

but didn't on the return

he got his virgins allright

I didn't stick around to count them

I needed a shower ...lol

 

[UncleBuck]

If he would have kept his damn mouth shut about his race there never would have been an issue.

and if blacks would have just painted themselves white, they never would have had to deal with slavery.

you're a racist stooge of the highest order.

 

[UncleBuck]

Muslim is not a race. I would say let him on the range moving targets are more fun

since you are such a tough guy, why not go out and shoot up a bunch of muslims, blacks, and mexicans?

or are you just a pathetic racist coward who can only talk big on the internet?

 

[Rrog]

Trump would have sold and marketed said white paint

 

[NLXSK1]

Muslim is not a race. I would say let him on the range moving targets are more fun and if he was belligerent on the range it would a self solving problem.

This isnt a joking matter. Those peoples lives were potentially at risk. They didnt shoot him, they didnt brandish their weapons, they asked him to leave. And he is now suing them which is insanity.

Their responsibility was the protection of their clients as it is 24/7 on a gun range.

 

[RickyBobby26]

The gun store owner said the guy was belligerent. And that his FFL license could be revoked if he knowingly allowed a belligerent person on the gun range. The US government (ATF), he claimed, specifically states that he is never supposed to allow anyone on the gun range that he has suspicions about. So I side with the gun store owner.

I saw an incident a few years ago in a gun store that was similarly interesting. It was on a Saturday morning, and the gun store was crowded and noisy. There was a man who looked and talked as though he was from the middle east talking with the gun store owner about buying a handgun. I was close enough to hear most of the conversation, before the customer was thrown out of the store. The customer was told there was a waiting period on handgun purchases. The customer started saying how that was stupid and he didn't like it. And his voice got a bit loud. The gun store owner thought the customer was mad at him. So he raised his voice, and the conversation continued and became an argument, and the customer was thrown out of the store.

About half way through the conversation, I realized that the customer was not arguing with the store owner at all; he was sympathizing with him about how stupid (in his opinion) handgun waiting times are. Yet his accent was heavy, and he did raise his voice, and the gun store owner (and others) misunderstood. Yet it's human to sometimes misunderstand, and the gun store owner did what he thought was necessary to diffuse what truly seemed to be a bad situation about to get worse. He threw the customer out of the store, rather unceremoniously.

So, should that customer have felt racially or religiously discriminated against?

 

[NLXSK1]

The gun store owner said the guy was belligerent. And that his FFL license could be revoked if he knowingly allowed a belligerent person on the gun range. The US government (ATF), he claimed, specifically states that he is never supposed to allow anyone on the gun range that he has suspicions about. So I side with the gun store owner.

I saw an incident a few years ago in a gun store that was similarly interesting. It was on a Saturday morning, and the gun store was crowded and noisy. There was a man who looked and talked as though he was from the middle east talking with the gun store owner about buying a handgun. I was close enough to hear most of the conversation, before the customer was thrown out of the store. The customer was told there was a waiting period on handgun purchases. The customer started saying how that was stupid and he didn't like it. And his voice got a bit loud. The gun store owner thought the customer was mad at him. So he raised his voice, and the conversation continued and became an argument, and the customer was thrown out of the store.

About half way through the conversation, I realized that the customer was not arguing with the store owner at all; he was sympathizing with him about how stupid (in his opinion) handgun waiting times are. Yet his accent was heavy, and he did raise his voice, and the gun store owner (and others) misunderstood. Yet it's human to sometimes misunderstand, and the gun store owner did what he thought was necessary to diffuse what truly seemed to be a bad situation about to get worse. He threw the customer out of the store, rather unceremoniously.

So, should that customer have felt racially or religiously discriminated against?

Have we gotten to the point in this country that when your feelings are hurt it is automatically religious or sexual discrimination?

 

[RickyBobby26]

Have we gotten to the point in this country that when your feelings are hurt it is automatically religious or sexual discrimination?

Well, not for me. But it seems to be becoming an epidemic.

 

[stawawager]

Buck, I think you are one with genuine cyber-courage. Remember the Muslims who took commercial jet airliner Landing lessons in Florida before 9:11?

I don't want them in my backyard, my front yard or anywhere near me. They hate Americans and want to take over the world and shove their devil religion down our throats. The last thing we need are more bleeding hearts.

 

[bearkat42]

Have we gotten to the point in this country that when your feelings are hurt it is automatically religious or sexual discrimination?

And what do you think got us to this point?

 

[NLXSK1]

And what do you think got us to this point?

Simply put the ability to a business owner to discriminate if they choose to do so. I completely agree that the government should not be able to but private business should have the right to be stupid.

The problem is that government is meddling in every aspect of our lives and it was never intended to do so.

 

[bearkat42]

Simply put the ability to a business owner to discriminate if they choose to do so. I completely agree that the government should not be able to but private business should have the right to be stupid.

The problem is that government is meddling in every aspect of our lives and it was never intended to do so.

So you support discrimination.

 

[NLXSK1]

So you support discrimination.

Everyone discriminates.

Discrimination is treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person.

You discriminate between your family and strangers. You discriminate between groups of people. Everyone does it. So yes, I do support discrimination. It would be silly to do otherwise.

 

[bearkat42]

Everyone discriminates.

Discrimination is treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person.

You discriminate between your family and strangers. You discriminate between groups of people. Everyone does it. So yes, I do support discrimination. It would be silly to do otherwise.

Instead of trying to talk around my statement, you could have just said "yes I do" and it would have saved you a bunch of keystrokes.

 

[kelly4]

I have no problem with someone being discriminated against because of their religion. ALL religions should be discriminated against. Religions are a pox on humanity.