Gardening with Dank 101

[tekdc911]

you dont have to agree to the terms of service to read posts

 

[hydrogreen65]

Don't know.. Wouldn't be hard though

 

[cat of curiosity]

That must mean he was busted in his house, and they (rudely) looked into his browsing history ........ but the site wasn't the source of him being busted

no; they got a name, tracked usage via isp subpoena, got probable cause, then busted into the house.

 

[slowandsteady]

Well, I'm not sure if it's a good thing or not. But don't think I'll see another 10 yrs. Done a lot of liver damage in a motorcycle wreck bout 15 yrs ago and it's not been wanting to act right lately. It built up a lot of scar tissue and it just seems to be slowly spreading.
Anyway, you can bet I'm gonna have fun how ever many it ends up. lol

Damn hate to hear that. Got the right attitude though more power to ya.

 

[cat of curiosity]

here miko...

https://www.google.com/search?q=Mik...la:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

 

[Miko2]

yes. well, not only, obviously, but the posts were a part of the prosecution, and an aid in probable cause/warrant. don't believe me? google your user name.

I've googled it, it shows me some Chinese sites....

not only because of .......
but posting here didnt help
and a few have claimed to have been narc'd by other members

Is that for real ? why would a stoner snitch other stoners ?

Cause he wasn't a stoner at the first place.

 

[Miko2]

here miko...

https://www.google.com/search?q=Miko2 rollitup.org&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a&channel=sb

yes I saw that.

1) RIU can block google from getting this info . why aren't they doing that ?

2) It shows nothing..

 

[wvblazin]

 

[cat of curiosity]

yes I saw that.

1) RIU can block google from getting this info . why aren't they doing that ?

2) It shows nothing..

shows your posts. if it shows your pictures and you're blatantly typing your life story, it can be rather incriminating. on it's own, it's nothing.

and leo does lurk this site and others, and even put infiltrators to attempt to entrap members. they usually get found, and either abandon the name, or get banned.

 

[Miko2]

no; they got a name, tracked usage via isp subpoena, got probable cause, then busted into the house.

Is that even allowed ?

Where's the freedom here ?

A moron can tell them "this guy is doing this and that" and that would be enough for them to be able to go to his ISP and so on .. ?

 

[hydrogreen65]

Damn hate to hear that. Got the right attitude though more power to ya.

I kind of accepted the fact a long time ago it was inevitable, the guidelines for transplants are rediculous. You have to be damn near dead before they will even think about it. That and the fact I got a felony assault on leo, from my younger dys. I pretty much knew I was screwed.
I'm still debating about what to do at the end... I just can't see myself bed ridden and having to have someone wipe my ass.. Nope, that's not for me.

 

[Miko2]

shows your posts. if it shows your pictures and you're blatantly typing your life story, it can be rather incriminating. on it's own, it's nothing.

and leo does lurk this site and others, and even put infiltrators to attempt to entrap members. they usually get found, and either abandon the name, or get banned.

Is that for real ?

It means I can get cops to break into someone's house !

I'll just pretend to be him here in this forum, "talk too much" and they'll break to his house ? wtf ?

 

[cat of curiosity]

Is that even allowed ?

Where's the freedom here ?

A moron can tell them "this guy is doing this and that" and that would be enough for them to be able to go to his ISP and so on .. ?

if said member is posting felonious sales/production and personal details, it's rather easy to get permission to investigate.

 

[wvblazin]

Freedom? Hahahaha

 

[cat of curiosity]

Is that for real ?

It means I can get cops to break into someone's house !

I'll just pretend to be him here in this forum, "talk too much" and they'll break to his house ? wtf ?

are you using 'his' computer?

 

[Miko2]

if said member is posting felonious sales/production and personal details, it's rather easy to get permission to investigate.

Than don't post your personal details ..

 

[cat of curiosity]

Than don't post your personal details ..

uh, yeah? maybe that's why rosey won't tell you a state?

lol

 

[Miko2]

are you using 'his' computer?

No, .. does that matter ?

What if you go to internet-cafe (do they exist ? ) and talk too much.. ?

 

[Miko2]

uh, yeah? maybe that's why rosey won't tell you a state?

lol

but a state is a BIG thing, there are millions of people in that state.....

 

[cat of curiosity]

No, .. does that matter ?

What if you go to internet-cafe (do they exist ? ) and talk too much.. ?

then personal ip/isp wouldn't be an issue? o.0

what's your point in this?

are you a cop? o.0

 

[tekdc911]

they could just call you a terrorist and use the patriot act excuse of they really wanted too
Title II sections that were to originally expire on December 31, 2005
SectionSection title
201Authority to intercept wire, oral, and electronic communications relating to terrorism
202Authority to intercept wire, oral, and electronic communications relating to computer fraud and abuse offenses
203(b)Authority to share electronic, wire and oral interception information
204Clarification of intelligence exceptions from limitations on interception and disclosure of wire, oral, and electronic communications
206Roving surveillance authority under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.
207Duration of FISA surveillance of non-United States persons who are agents of a foreign power
209Seizure of voice-mail messages pursuant to warrants
212Emergency disclosure of electronic communications to protect life and limb
214Pen register and trap and trace authority under FISA
215Access to records and other items under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
217Interception of computer trespasser communications
218Foreign intelligence information
220Nationwide service of search warrants for electronic evidence
223Civil liability for certain unauthorized disclosures
225Immunity for compliance with FISA wiretap

Is that even allowed ?

Where's the freedom here ?

A moron can tell them "this guy is doing this and that" and that would be enough for them to be able to go to his ISP and so on .. ?