Defoliation Experiment - Side by Side Sister Clones

chuck estevez

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member
I call em as I see em and,So far, the UMM, "professor" has been caught in SEVERAL Lies, So I wouldn't believe a fuckin word HE says. Neo is just a dipshit who contradicts himself every other post.
MAYBE sam seedwell has some, and I use the word lightly, respect of the community. Other than that, this thread is just a joke. And I am lmfao right now.
 
profterpen

profterpen

New Member
chuck estevez said:
I call em as I see em and,So far, the UMM, "professor" has been caught in SEVERAL Lies, So I wouldn't believe a fuckin word HE says. Neo is just a dipshit who contradicts himself every other post.
MAYBE sam seedwell has some, and I use the word lightly, respect of the community. Other than that, this thread is just a joke. And I am lmfao right now.
Click to expand...
As a kid Chuck made his dad go to his room.

They call me Bunny
 
profterpen

profterpen

New Member
profterpen

profterpen

New Member
chuck estevez said:
I call em as I see em and,So far, the UMM, "professor" has been caught in SEVERAL Lies, So I wouldn't believe a fuckin word HE says. Neo is just a dipshit who contradicts himself every other post.
MAYBE sam seedwell has some, and I use the word lightly, respect of the community. Other than that, this thread is just a joke. And I am lmfao right now.
Click to expand...
All in good fun old blue eyes Chuck Sinatra, make'n a Defolator disappear like Jimmy Hoffa :confused:

Yo Chuck did the weed man get here yet?

They call me Bunny
 
natro.hydro

natro.hydro

Well-Known Member
Chuck, when did the prof lie? Just curious not calling you out or nothing but up until you say he lied thought he was a pretty upstanding guy based on this thread, especially considering you guys have taken over his thread with the bickering. anyone else noticed that no headway has been made by either side in regards to whose right or wrong. Mayybe we should stick to our respective sides of the sandbox til this one is over...
 
profterpen

profterpen

New Member
chuck estevez said:
[video=youtube;_hMbpUWbR8M]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hMbpUWbR8M[/video]
Click to expand...
You called me a liar Chuck, that hurt. After all them years in school, no one takes my Storyteller seriously :( I'll have you know that The Commonwealth of Virginia County Jail Online Paperback Edition of How to become a Master Storyteller is no joke. T-bone switch his name to just T and he already has an interview at a used car lot. For the last six months I've been double double studying (it's a term, a technycalable one). Please respect the education bra.

I'll give you a rep for the song though.

They call me Bunny
 
J

joe macclennan

Well-Known Member
chuck estevez said:
trying to explain ANYTHING to that tard is like clapping with 1 hand. First he says,"you're doing it wrong" then says, There is no correct way yet. Then he claims it turbo charges and speeds up the plant. 3 pages later he says you have to give it time to repair itself. He talks out of his ass and really should just go sit in the corner.
Click to expand...
lol@ clapping with one hand.
neo12345 said:
We get you, it's not very efficient. That's ok though because I hate polar bears with a passion, and I have plenty of money so that's not a concern.
Click to expand...
thank you young grasshoppa :)

neo12345 said:
Oh god, I've started the analogies!! Efficiency is fine really if you are into that sort of thing, and yes I buy food that ends up getting thrown away. Doesn't everyone?

Would you rather drive a Toyota Prius or a Ferrari 458?? Efficiency, don't believe the hype.
Click to expand...
so where is your ferarri?

who else thinks neo probably looks like this?

lilroach said:
May I make a suggestion to the OP.....you may want to change your post fonts or color of your fonts so we can easily follow your experiment without having to read the continued back-and-forth of those that seem to have hijacked your thread.
Click to expand...
quit crying. Or go somewhere else. If you don't like the banter.

charface said:
Please.
Make your suggestions in blue.
Im trying to read what these guys are saying.
Click to expand...
lol
 
chuck estevez

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member
natro.hydro said:
Chuck, when did the prof lie? Just curious not calling you out or nothing but up until you say he lied thought he was a pretty upstanding guy based on this thread, especially considering you guys have taken over his thread with the bickering. anyone else noticed that no headway has been made by either side in regards to whose right or wrong. Mayybe we should stick to our respective sides of the sandbox til this one is over...
Click to expand...
said he was a DR. and a Professor, claimed to be a women with a mentally ill child. Claimed to be a master grower with the 420 institute. Shall I Keep going???
 
natro.hydro

natro.hydro

Well-Known Member
Damn when was all that?? This thread moves way to quick fpr me to keep up with. And no joking this was stated in seriousness? Starting to have doubts...
edit for humor cus yall are too serious: a doctor and a professor i can by but a women, no way would our male elitist society allow for that shit too happen lol.
 
chuck estevez

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member

  • I'm new here and I joined to help people. I'm not sure why you guys are only interested in diagnosing my terminology and name. That is my real last name and I happen to be a doctor and professor.


    • I have been working on broad criteria for medical growers in hopes to set a higher bar and another level of acceptance for the professional level grower


      • I have a severely disabled son and my work is ultimately in hopes to just maybe find the best strain I can to make his life that much better.


        • hey treat the new guy like a fool and tear apart anything he says.


          • I'm also a woman, so is my wife. At least stop calling me a guy.

            I COULD keep going,lol​




          ​




        ​





      ​




    ​




 
^su

^su

Active Member
neo12345 said:
I thought you had done the experiment for yourself, now it's just an educated guess? I did ask previously if there was any actual evidence showing that it doesn't work, but it appears that nobody has actually done a side by side experiment to show that it doesn't work either!!!

So if there is no evidence against then how can you be so sure that it doesn't work?

P.S This thread is virtually a sticky, as it has been at the top here since it started!!
Click to expand...
ive grown under similar conditions to know the outcome but not enough variance to change the results, most people don't document failed grows. The fact you don't know the difference between a sticky says it all, like chuck said, go sit in the corner dumbass.
 
natro.hydro

natro.hydro

Well-Known Member
Lol glad you didnt make me go back through the archives for those. Well prof you got some splainin to do! The prof+dr. thing i can grasp because in order to teach medicine you must hold a phd (making you a doctor) and lesbian with a partner and mentally disabled is not a far stretch in society nowadays. Soooo i guess my only question is are you a statistcal unicorn in the growing community or just too good to be true??
 
profterpen

profterpen

New Member
chuck estevez said:
said he was a DR. and a Professor, claimed to be a women with a mentally ill child. Claimed to be a master grower with the 420 institute. Shall I Keep going???
Click to expand...
I am a doctor. I am a professor. I am the 420 Institute (it's a start up). I may be a master grower, even if I were I'm not because I don't know anything. I highly doubt I said I was a master, show me the quote. I do have a 7 year old son with Angelman Syndrome. And the woman thing was a joke based on a story I told in 1745 bc.

Yes keep going...

They call me Bunny
 
UncleReemis

UncleReemis

Well-Known Member
Refer to the thread that started this thread: 420 Institute with Prof. Terpen. Don't feel like linking it on my phone.

Refer to story about Crickets. Storyteller skills.

I think it's inefficient to defoliate. I don't think it's inefficient to cut dying leaves or leaves that are so far covered up that they receive no light.. But this has been covered. Just my prediction.

Neo, I thought you were peacin out a few hundred pages back? :P you need to lick your wounds
 
neo12345

neo12345

Well-Known Member
I guess people just don't get sarcasm, the post about hating polar bears clearly went over some heads. I was agreeing with Su in a sarcastic way hoping that he'd give everyone here a break and take his goonies with him, that clearly didn't work!

I haven't changed my original view that defoliation doesn't have to make any difference to vegging time, if you veg for 4 weeks normally then you just veg for 2 weeks then defoliate then veg for another 2 weeks. It totals 4 weeks now matter how you want to count it!! Please explain to me how how that takes any more time or money??

Why is it that every time I ask for some real evidence for the argument against it just doesn't happen, I can't believe there is nothing about it on the internet. No stickies about how defoliation doesn't work, no educational lessons about how it extends your vegging time, no stories of actual failures, no side by side experiments, it all seems to be what my mate told me and the general consensus and nothing with a concrete foundation.

@Hue I don't feel that I have any wounds, only factual evidence will hurt me. When you get called names then you've generally won the argument. I'm still stinging like a butterfly and floating like a bee, or something like that anyway! lol :-?
 
UncleReemis

UncleReemis

Well-Known Member
By the looks of it, you got mauled for a few pages. I'm not saying you're wrong :P I rather enjoyed reading it all while I was crafting wool bandages for the hurt butts.


I am offended at everyone's lack of interest in MY life;
do you people even care that I had a hangnail for most of today? :roll:
Shit is serious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top