100 watt cfl 1 month flowering *PICS*

greenthumbgrower

Active Member
This is my 2nd grow using cfls.
what do u think????
 

Attachments

  • my baby 001.JPG
    my baby 001.JPG
    93.5 KB · Views: 288
  • my baby 002.JPG
    my baby 002.JPG
    66.9 KB · Views: 208
  • my baby 016.JPG
    my baby 016.JPG
    95.8 KB · Views: 211
She's not that tall but she's got plenty of fine looking bud sites.
all in all a good looking plant.
 
lol nope the tube light is not pluged in. And I was wrong on how I said grew under 1_100w cfl. it was under the 100 and the 80w cfl with 6 others. all male. After sexing and removeing the males. that one is now under the 100w by it's self. and the sprouts of the new mom search are under the 80w. your right you can't see the cfl I just looked. so I grew this under the one 4' tube you see lol. I will get a pic with the light in it.
 
here is a pic before loosing the males. look no tube in the corner. I was tired of that tube falling over and getting in the way. so I stuck it in the corner. I move the lights up when I take pic's. I need to get batt's for the camra will get a shot of current before the day is done. Do you think the 80w had much affect on the plants under the 100? To me it seems it is to far away to do them much good.
kb strain 001.jpg

kb strain 003.jpg
 
Grrrr. new pic's tried to show the cord for the tube light cuz it still looks on. I think the 80w is to far away to do any good for that lone girl.
kb strain 037.jpg

kb strain 036.jpg
 
I use hps for flower with added cfl 42w. and the next flower eill have a 60w uv light in the mix.
 
look close you can see the plug hanging on the tube. I know they look on. I wonder if they have any reflective benefits.
sorry if you want to think this is other then what I'm saying.
 
Back
Top