Tarantino Fans This is your thread

QT is one of the most brilliant (albeit fucked up) directors there is out right now. I haven't watched pulp fiction in years but reading this thread just motivated me to get that movie.

four rooms was great at the end when dude gets his finger chopped off

Only reason that most people are saying Pulp Fiction is because most havent seen true romance. If you have not seen that movie, drop what you are doing and go watch it NOW! Havent seen Inglorious Bastards yet but it look awsome! Gotta love QT!

Originally Posted by MauiLover1

Only reason that most people are saying Pulp Fiction is because most havent seen true romance. If you have not seen that movie, drop what you are doing and go watch it NOW! Havent seen Inglorious Bastards yet but it look awsome! Gotta love QT!

True romance was directed by Tony Scott not QT

y is that on the list??

I've liked all his work but I hated Inglourios basterds because alternate history is pointless IMO.
Carving in the head of innocent soldiers? Scalping innocent soldiers? By american soldiers in wwII? Cmon.
12 week looking soldiers sabotaging whole German platoons? Cmon.
Unrealistic and disrespectful to history and the people that experienced first hand the horrors of WWII.
And that being said the Basterds were hardly even in the movie.
The movie has no historical scope.

This movie fails as a war movie, as a comedy, as satire, as a gore fest.
It was not entertaining and it made a mockery of history.

But Chrisopher waltz' performance was great.

Originally Posted by williamwilde13

I just realized I should have made it Multiple answers cause its almost impossible to pick a favorite I just tried. Oh well, its not like its official. I went to go see Inglorious Basterds twice, it was that good, What did you guys think?

i tried to vote for 4 movies but couldnt....

i cant favor only one so i didnt vote... sorry

Tarintino wrote the screenplay for True Romance, From Dusk Til Dawn(directed by Rodriguez), And Natural Born Killers( Directed by Stone)

And I think Four Rooms he only directed the last scene. i know the scene with the kids was by Rodriguez.

Originally Posted by williamwilde13

Hey I got a question.. Why did Hans Landa Choke a bitch!?

Dude.....He choked her because he found the napkin with her autograph for that dudes kid on it and he knew she was in on whatever happened in that bar(he walked in and saw all the carnage)....then she showed up with those dudes obviously not italian......so he killed her.....


Back on original topic though....Natural born killers was my favorite until inglorious bastards came out.....I was cracking up laughing the entire movie...Im pretty sure i was hysterically laughing louder than anyone else in the theather, couldn't help myself though

Originally Posted by Tryingtomastrkush

Dude.....He choked her because he found the napkin with her autograph for that dudes kid on it and he knew she was in on whatever happened in that bar(he walked in and saw all the carnage)....then she showed up with those dudes obviously not italian......so he killed her.....


Back on original topic though....Natural born killers was my favorite until inglorious bastards came out.....I was cracking up laughing the entire movie...Im pretty sure i was hysterically laughing louder than anyone else in the theather, couldn't help myself though

Ahh, but that doesn't quite answer the question... If Hans Landa felt so strongly about his position under Hitler and that actress being a traitor then why would he turn around 10 minutes later and trade sides himself???... something doesnt add up.

Originally Posted by tebor

I've liked all his work but I hated Inglourios basterds because alternate history is pointless IMO.
Carving in the head of innocent soldiers? Scalping innocent soldiers? By american soldiers in wwII? Cmon.
12 week looking soldiers sabotaging whole German platoons? Cmon.
Unrealistic and disrespectful to history and the people that experienced first hand the horrors of WWII.
And that being said the Basterds were hardly even in the movie.
The movie has no historical scope.

This movie fails as a war movie, as a comedy, as satire, as a gore fest.
It was not entertaining and it made a mockery of history.

But Chrisopher waltz' performance was great.

Cmon man, That movie was art! It wasn't supposed to replace history, or accurately document it. It took a part of history, a part that holds a lot of weight in opinion, and slapped a completely new perspective on it... not to mention the genious plot line and scenes of rubberband stretching tension!!! You mean to tell me none of that moved you at all?