Do you belive in UFO's?

i think most ufos are complete bullshit, some are military secrets and the rest (less than once percent) may have been actual alien craft. but it is unlikely an alien species has visited, for one simple reason, think about what we did to africa and the americas, any species looking to survive and prosper will expand its domain especially when the opponent is less technologically advanced.

Originally Posted by Saulleron

Well friends you must have heard about UFO's and lots of research are being going on this to find the real fact.
So, what do you think about it?

Hi Saulleron good question. All those Ufo's in old Chris Columbus stories and religious art is nothing more than product placement. My theory about UFOS is they originated near Tourraine France, and it was hidden because there was proof that evolution was not real. The US military invested in things like hovercraft, sflo I'm pretty sure they'd know if something uniquley, physically possible. What do you think of the flying saucers that get captured on tapes?

No i dont believe in UFO.I think it just a human tendency to research if there is more people talking about particular thing.Now a days people are talking about nanotechnology but still we dont have any practice example of that.

i will accept that in an ever expanding universe the possibility exists of intelligent life on other planets, life that may even be capable of inter-stellar travel, but i dont believe that any extra terrestrials have visited earth. so no, i dont believe in UFO's


(or santa claus, the tooth fairy, leprechauns, angels, ghosts, psychic abilities, sober irishmen, working welsh coal miners, nice south africans or non-perverted priests)

UFO
Usually Fucked-up Opinion

Unusually Focused Orangutang

Under Foreign Orders

I think that UFO's are coming from Uranus. Turn off your TV and go outside for awhile and you'll feel more sane.

Do you know the technology a race would have to possess to attain galactic/intergalactic travel? It isn't what you see on TV or the movies. If they would ever arrive at our planet there would be no mystery, it would be spectacular and obvious imo. Each and every serious ufo investigation is easily explained and has never been aliens. I'm of the mind it's highly improbable that we are the only life in this universe, but they haven't been here...

Do I believe in Unidentified Flying Objects? Yes. Do I believe aliens are visiting us? No.

Originally Posted by tyler.durden

Do you know the technology a race would have to possess to attain galactic/intergalactic travel? It isn't what you see on TV or the movies. If they would ever arrive at our planet there would be no mystery, it would be spectacular and obvious imo. Each and every serious ufo investigation is easily explained and has never been aliens. I'm of the mind it's highly improbable that we are the only life in this universe, but they haven't been here...

It would be spectacular and obvious if they used a reaction drive. But the energetics of reaction drives are awful. The best example, a photon drive, needs energy of mc² in order to produce impulse of mc, meaning that you need c times as much energy as you're actually giving the ship. A photon drive consumes 300 megawatts for every newton of thrust! Imo that is one of the best arguments that nobody's using photon drives; they'd be detectable at cosmological distances.

So we are almost forced to assume that interstellar travel will use a nonreaction drive ... or be in slowboats running at perhaps a few thousand km/sec. The energetics of a diametric (polarized gravity) drive reduce to the energy needed to shift the ship. The philosophical quirk here is that it takes 21x the energy to get from 10km/s to 11 km/s than it takes to go from standstill to 1 km/s. Against which reference frame is a diametric drive acting? cn