Please, please, don't bring this before the Supremes before a few of those psycho fascists are removed.
bin Laden wins again!
I predicted this wayyy back when I saw the movie "The Terminator" in 1984. We have even scarier things in store for us as well (I already know), but this is the beginning of the whole enchilda.
Day of wide-spread domestic drone use nears
Published 12 June 2012
So far, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration( FAA) has issued 266 active testing permits for civilian-drone applications, but has yet to allow drones wide-scale access to U.S. airspace; law enforcement and industry officials say that it is only a matter of time before the FAA would allow the more than 18,000 law enforcement agencies and departments to begin to use drones for surveillance
If you thought that the use of drones in the war against terrorists is controversial, wait until drones are used more widely in domestic surveillance and law enforcement missions. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has already issued permits to several police departments to use UAVs, but the practice is not yet wide-spread.
The Daily Mail reports that on 23 April, Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley issued a 30-page memorandum discussing the issue of drone use in domestic missions. Donley says that drones may be used to “collect information about U.S. persons,” and that the photos that these drones will collect may be retained, used, or even distributed to other branches of the U.S. government as long as the “recipient is reasonably perceived to have a specific, lawful governmental function” in seeking to have access to the photos (Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, offers a different take on the legality of domestic drone use; see his Washington Times article).
Donley writes that the purpose of his memorandum is “balancing … obtaining intelligence information … and protecting individual rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.”
Officials from law enforcement and the aviation industry, as well as security experts and some lawmakers, argue that the use of drones in domestic mission is inevitable. “It’s going to happen,” Dan Elwell, vice president of civil aviation at the Aerospace Industries Association, told the Seattle Times. “Now it’s about figuring out how to safely assimilate the technology into national airspace.”
The Mail notes that, so far, the FAA has issued 266 active testing permits for civilian-drone applications, but has yet to allow drones wide-scale access to U.S. airspace. The main reason is security: the technology to make sure that drones do not collide with each other or other aircraft, and that they do not fall in densely populated areas, either does not exist or is expensive.
Still, drone manufacturers say they are preparing for the day the FAA give a green light for domestic drone use, and they work on drone prototypes suitable for domestic use. California-based drone maker AeroVironment has been supplying the military with small surveillance drones, and it has recently developed a miniature helicopter drone, dubbed Qube, designed specifically for police use in urban settings. The company says it will find many customers among the more than 18,000 state and local police agencies for the miniature drone.
A typical helicopter used by law enforcement agencies in the United States costs about $1.7 million. AeroVironment notes the Qube will cost about $40,000. (my note- AeroVironment company executives have been recently targeted by Anon)
Last edited by MacGuyver4.2.0; 06-12-2012 at 09:22 PM.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" -Albert Einstein
Please, please, don't bring this before the Supremes before a few of those psycho fascists are removed.
bin Laden wins again!
Yup those conservative judges cant wait to fuck us fast enough.
This is my virtual world. This is my fantasy. I'm accumulating knowledge for the day when we come to our senses. Thank you internet.
We're almost 16 trillion dollars in the hole and our gov thinks it's a good idea to spend money on fucking drones?
Hope for the best but expect the worse
Well, the thing about Terminator, Matrix, I, Robot. etc, it is practically inevitable. But, these stories, like 1984 are only hints.
We will wish it was so broad stroke as a movie. In fact, the actuality of 1984 could not come true, it's too overt. What did come true is the mind control of the News-Congress-Lobby-Entertainment complex. I gladly have an x-box Kenict watching me, my cell phone knows were I am, on and on. The NSA robots are listening to everything.
But, what we are seeing, with this redefining of privacy, is the beginning of the true nightmare.....for the have nots.....For us "have's" (and if you a tax payer, you are a Have) it is the beginning of a new species of Man. Augmented and Robot protected Man. ARPM.
Robot wars on the back side of the moon will decide the advertising rights of Coke vs Pepsi, perhaps? IAC, the future always seems far worse than predicted.
Last edited by Doer; 06-13-2012 at 12:04 PM.
"If we must die, we die defending our rights." Sitting Bull, Shaman of Lakota Sioux http://www.rollitup.org/blogs/353494-doer.htm
ffs, were all screwed oh well at leats i got my tinfoil hat nobody is controlling me,i dont own a cellphone lol
Wait for the lawsuits when they crash one of those drones into someone's house or a school. Even better, or worse if you will, they don't seem to be under air traffic control so they will probably be responsible for bringing down a passenger plane.
Life's a journey, not a destination.
This drone is small enough to fit through a screen in a window and can take a blood sample and you wouldnt even know.
![]()
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/local/...e-drone/nTNZG/
OAKLAND, Calif. —
The Alameda County sheriff has vowed that his department won't use an aerial drone to spy on ordinary people, but civil liberties groups say there still needs to be some guidelines to ensure privacy.
Alameda County Sheriff Greg Ahern said Tuesday that a drone his department is pursuing would be used for search and rescue missions, responding to wildfires and to capture fugitives, not for surveillance and intelligence gathering on civilians.
"This device is used for mission-specific incidents," Ahern told the San Francisco Chronicle. "We strive to gain the public's trust in everything we do, and I would never do anything of this nature that would destroy the public's trust beyond repair."
Nice to hear. Wish he was on the national stage.
Bookmarks