Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
Like Tree1Likes
Technology / Science

Gravity Waves

in the

Cannabis Cafe

forums; Compressed Space. We were wondering about that. They are busy building instruments to detect them. plus.maths.org/content/catching-waves-kip-thorne ...
  1. #1
    Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja Doer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011

    Location
    in the Now
    Posts
    4,785
    Journal Entries
    166

    Default Gravity Waves

    Compressed Space. We were wondering about that. They are busy building instruments to detect them.

    plus.maths.org/content/catching-waves-kip-thorne
    "If we must die, we die defending our rights." Sitting Bull, Shaman of Lakota Sioux http://www.rollitup.org/blogs/353494-doer.htm

  2. #2
    420 TIME Stoner Weedasaurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012

    Location
    Kepler 22-B
    Posts
    609

    Default

    are you refering to dark matter?

  3. #3
    Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja Doer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011

    Location
    in the Now
    Posts
    4,785
    Journal Entries
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Weedasaurus View Post
    are you refering to dark matter?
    Well, no, but, perhaps it is part of the problem. I get into this a bit more in the "Photon Tunneling..." thread. The idea is to measure the compression of Space itself. They seek to measure point source Gravity Waves and are looking for Space Compression factor, at this distance
    of about 1/10 of an atom. That feature, if proven, will open an entire new lines of reasoning about everything from Energy to Propulsion.
    If we get 1/10 angstrom here, what is the compression at the source? What is the attenuation model/mechanism over these distances?

    I posted some math about Space Density in the Math thread.

    In my layman reasoning, I see Dark Matter as a form of matter that is also condensed from Spacetime, but is not as entirely condensed as what we call visible matter. It could be the Rosetta Stone for understanding how Space Resonance accounts for energy, matter, and time. The heralded
    Grand Unification.
    Last edited by Doer; 05-27-2012 at 08:15 AM.
    "If we must die, we die defending our rights." Sitting Bull, Shaman of Lakota Sioux http://www.rollitup.org/blogs/353494-doer.htm

  4. #4
    Math Mod Mr. Ganja RyanTheRhino's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009

    Location
    Passed Out Drunk In Some Bush
    Posts
    6,368

    Default

    You know, in physics every time something is un-explainable they blame gravity. I feel like once gravity is figured out we will unraveled technologies beyond your wildest dreams. The huge advancements we see today is because we understand the atom and what you can do with it. Atoms may be the building blocks of life, but i bet gravity will be the fuel.
    Ryan's Chocolate Tree Grow

    "Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, and wept for there were no more worlds to conquer."

  5. #5
    Mr.Ganja Mr. Ganja Mr Neutron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011

    Location
    Old Mexico
    Posts
    3,374

    Default

    Matter and time are illusions. Matter is an illusion created from standing waves in space and time is an illusion created by conscientiousness.
    As you are, I was... as I am, you will be.

    http://www.10thamendmentfoundation.org/

  6. #6
    Stoner Mr. Ganja MacGuyver4.2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009

    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,190

    Default

    because gravity is directly related to mass, it may be more of a 'perk' than an actual benefit. For instance, the gravity of the moon is substantially less, (83.3% less than earth's to be exact) so gravity there does not have the same effect. More math here:

    Acceleration due to gravity is the acceleration of a freely falling body. Free falling means to drop vertically with no air resistance and an acceleration that doesn't change, or that is constant. The symbol for acceleration due to gravity is the letter g. The acceleration due to gravity, g is directed towards the center of whatever object gravity is draw towards, for example Earth, or any other planet.
    An equation can be used to find the gravitational acceleration in different places. This equation is …
    G is a constant, called the universal gravitational constant, which is equal to 6.67 × 10-11 N·m2/kg2. M is the mass of the object in which gravitational acceleration is being found. R is the radius of the object. There is a negative sign in front of the equation because objects in free fall always fall downwards toward the center of the object.
    The acceleration due to gravity is 1.62 m/s2. This is approximately 1/6 that of the acceleration due to gravity on Earth, 9.81 m/s2.

    So naturally, to overide gravity you only need to devise a way to offset your mass. A heavy ship in the ocean should technically sink, but does not, due to displacement. Find a way to displace your mass and you have anti-gravity. Simple.
    Last edited by MacGuyver4.2.0; 06-19-2012 at 01:13 PM.
    Murfy likes this.
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" -Albert Einstein

  7. #7
    Ganja Smoker Pot Head Seedling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Posts
    310

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MacGuyver4.2.0 View Post
    because gravity is directly related to mass, it may be more of a 'perk' than an actual benefit. For instance, the gravity of the moon is substantially less, (83.3% less than earth's to be exact) so gravity there does not have the same effect. More math here:

    Acceleration due to gravity is the acceleration of a freely falling body. Free falling means to drop vertically with no air resistance and an acceleration that doesn't change, or that is constant. The symbol for acceleration due to gravity is the letter g. The acceleration due to gravity, g is directed towards the center of whatever object gravity is draw towards, for example Earth, or any other planet.
    An equation can be used to find the gravitational acceleration in different places. This equation is …
    G is a constant, called the universal gravitational constant, which is equal to 6.67 × 10-11 N·m2/kg2. M is the mass of the object in which gravitational acceleration is being found. R is the radius of the object. There is a negative sign in front of the equation because objects in free fall always fall downwards toward the center of the object.
    The acceleration due to gravity is 1.62 m/s2. This is approximately 1/6 that of the acceleration due to gravity on Earth, 9.81 m/s2.

    So naturally, to overide gravity you only need to devise a way to offset your mass. A heavy ship in the ocean should techincally sink, but does not, due to displacement. Find a way to displace your mass and you have anti-gravity. Simple.
    A little clarification. While Mr. Newton certainly was a smart fellow, he made a few errors along the way. According to Newton's first law, the velocity of a body (a state of rest or of uniform motion in a straight line) remains constant unless the body is compelled to change that state by external forces acted upon it. The problem with his first law is that there is no place in the universe that an object is free of external forces, due to gravity. So, his first law is...how you say..hot air!

    You made a statement that acceleration doesn't change, or is constant. Let me remind you, acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. In the absence of an opposing force (such as air resistance) to a free falling object, an object will continue to increase in velocity due to the acceleration of gravity. But...not only does the velocity increase, but so too does the acceleration increase, as the object is getting closer to the center of the earth as it falls towards the earth. The closer an object is to the earth the greater the acceleration due to gravity.

    So, your statement, along with Mr. Newton's law is incorrect.
    Last edited by Seedling; 06-19-2012 at 02:34 PM.

  8. #8
    Stoner Mr. Ganja MacGuyver4.2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009

    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,190

    Default

    Seedling-

    Some good observations, but may have forgot the following:

    In fluid dynamics an object is moving at its terminal velocity if its speed is constant due to the restraining force exerted by the fluid through which it is moving. So fluids which are under an external force, (i.e, pressure) are only partially subject to gravitys pull as the pressure is the external driving force.
    A free-falling object achieves its terminal velocity when the downward force of gravity (FG) equals the upward force of drag (Fd). This causes the net force on the object to be zero, resulting in an acceleration of zero.[1])
    As the object accelerates (usually downwards due to gravity), the drag force acting on the object increases, causing the acceleration to decrease. At a particular speed, the drag force produced will equal the object's weight . At this point the object ceases to accelerate altogether and continues falling at a constant speed called terminal velocity (also called settling velocity). An object moving downward with greater than terminal velocity (for example because it was thrown downwards or it fell from a thinner part of the atmosphere or it changed shape) will slow down until it reaches terminal velocity.

    Also don't forget, gravity is a coorelation to mass. If you are in deep space with no gravitational or external forces, you are at a constant: Either moving or stopped.
    Newtonian mechanics has been superseded by special relativity, but it is still useful as an approximation when the speeds involved are much slower than the speed of light.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_velocity
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion




    For the record- Newton and his buddies are still pretty smart, even if they are long dead.
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits" -Albert Einstein

  9. #9
    Ganja Smoker Pot Head Seedling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Posts
    310

    Default

    Yeah, I know what terminal velocity is, but you weren't talking about terminal velocity when you said, "Free falling means to drop vertically with no air resistance and an acceleration that doesn't change, or that is constant."

    No air resistance means no opposing force, so no terminal velocity is reached, the velocity just keeps increasing, and the rate at which the velocity increases is acceleration. But like I said earlier, as the objects get closer together the acceleration also increases, which means the velocity increases at a greater rate the closer the objects get to each other.

    Don't get me started on SR. What a load of crap!
    Last edited by Seedling; 06-19-2012 at 07:06 PM.

  10. #10
    Ganja Smoker Pot Head Seedling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009

    Posts
    310

    Default

    A little more food for thought about gravity. Some people already know this, but some don't, so I'll post it, because it is fun stuff!

    Question: Negating air resistance, how much time does it take for a bowling ball to impact the ground when it's dropped from a height of 50 meters? How about 100 meters? Some would probably think that if it takes x amount of time to impact the ground when dropped from a known height of 50 meters, that it would take twice as much time to reach the ground when dropped from a height of 100 meters. Let's find out!!

    formula.jpg

    So in order to find the time (t) of impact we need to know the initial velocity (u) which is zero in this case, the acceleration (a) which we'll use 9.8 m/s^2 for this example, and the distance (d), which we have 50 meters and 100 meters for two separate tests of impact time.

    The bowling ball dropped from a height of 50 meters will impact the ground in 3.19 seconds.
    The bowling ball dropped from a height of 100 meters will impact the ground in 4.52 seconds.

    So, we see that doubling the height doesn't double the time. We also see that nowhere in the equation does it ask for the weight, or mass of the object. So in the absence of an opposing force (air resistance), a bowling ball and a marble should impact the ground in the same amount of time.

    If we wanted to know the velocity of the bowling ball when it impacts the ground from the two heights we could use

    formula2.jpg

    ...and we find that the bowling ball dropped from a height of 50 meters impacts the ground at a velocity of 31.30 m/s (70.02 MPH), and the bowling ball dropped from the height of 100 meters has a velocity of 44.27 m/s (99.03 MPH).

    Fun stuff eh??
    Last edited by Seedling; 06-20-2012 at 05:31 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •