UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i wonder why @chemphlegm changed his vote?
just wants to be a piece of shit but not be known as a piece of shit?
just wants to be a piece of shit but not be known as a piece of shit?
Would you support a bill that required the consent of the father to obtain an abortion?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
srh88
Well-Known Member
nope.. corn poop dicks
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Thanks but I've already eaten.
SneekyNinja
Well-Known Member
This is a stupid thread.
Noone cares about your "men's rights" bullshit.
Fight for something useful (like equal custody rights for mothers and fathers) instead of this stupid bullshit.
Forcing a woman to carry a child to term (that you impregnated her with) is arguably more aggrevous than rape.
Padawan trying to trap women with babies, jacks off to duct rape anal tape...
SAD!
Noone cares about your "men's rights" bullshit.
Fight for something useful (like equal custody rights for mothers and fathers) instead of this stupid bullshit.
Forcing a woman to carry a child to term (that you impregnated her with) is arguably more aggrevous than rape.
Padawan trying to trap women with babies, jacks off to duct rape anal tape...
SAD!
chemphlegm
Well-Known Member
nope, actually talked awhile with the wife, you know, of the female kind, and realized exactly what I felt. Originally I thought of this as a wife needing the permission of her husband to abort their baby, but then realized the bigger picture. Comprehende pendejo?
Rent Free in your head, 24/7 !!!
Fender Super
Well-Known Member
Completely oppose. The father had plenty of opportunities to place his reproductive in his own hands. If he fails at that simple thing, he deserves his fate.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
So a better, more persuasive argument came along and you changed your position.
Well done! Now, if we only could do that with 50 million other people...
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
Didn't the mother also have the opportunity to place her reproduction in her own hands? If she fails at that simple thing, do you also believe she "deserves her fate"?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
No support here.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
hello there, bitter MRA.
can you please name every form of birth control which is 100% effective?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
There seems to be a potential inequity here.
What if a man wants the woman to abort and she refuses? Should the man then be made to use his body to labor for the upkeep of a child he didn't want ? If women own their bodies, don't men too?
As an answer to the original question. I am not in favor of a bill which requires the consent of the man. Although I do wonder if the "consent" of the unborn should be considered ?
What if a man wants the woman to abort and she refuses? Should the man then be made to use his body to labor for the upkeep of a child he didn't want ? If women own their bodies, don't men too?
As an answer to the original question. I am not in favor of a bill which requires the consent of the man. Although I do wonder if the "consent" of the unborn should be considered ?
tampee
Well-Known Member
That man should have wore a condom kids are expensive and it's a full time job raising a child until they go to school.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
wow.
you've gone from thinking that 11 year olds can consent, to now thinking that fetuses can consent.
Fender Super
Well-Known Member
No. It's not the man's body. He has no say. He had a chance to prevent pregnancy: vasectomy, rubbers, whatever. But once conception takes place, the woman has all the say. It's HER body, NOT the man's. Have you always been this stupid, or did you have to take a class?
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
I agree it should be legal for a woman to have one. I also think that the mans permission shouldn't be needed.
What if the man wants the kid?
What if the man wants the kid?
Fender Super
Well-Known Member
Too bad. Should have stuck his dick in someone who wanted a kid.
whitebb2727
Well-Known Member
That doesn't bring anything to the discussion. You know it doesn't.
Just saying. What if two people agree to kids and then the woman decides not to have it?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
then the dude is SOL.
Fender Super
Well-Known Member
Then they don't have kids. There is NO discussion. The woman has the say, once conception takes place. What is there to discuss? Men have ALL the control, until they give it up. Once given up, they rarely get it back. That's LIFE. Is it fair? Maybe not, but until men can carry pregnancies to term (yeah, right), once they jizz in the cooter, it's up to the woman.
It's called taking responsibility for your own behavior. Until the moment of the male orgasm, they have control. If they have prepared, conception won't take place and everyone can deal with other consequences of unprotected sex. It doesn't matter if you like it, it's NOT your body, and thus, the man has no say, once conception has taken place. So it's up to the man to prepare in advance and be responsible. Fucking is OPTIONAL. I give no quarter to the unprepared or the stupid. Which one are you? I had a vasectomy at 35, took that long to find a urologist to do the procedure, but it's 28, now!!! Had one scare, paid for the abortion and I'm not sorry. In fact, I'm SO proud. >:-O
Last edited: