Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
So if a woman gets pregnant, in order for her to legally have access to an abortion, she and the father would have to legally consent to it.
Would you support or oppose that?
Would you support or oppose that?
Would you support a bill that required the consent of the father to obtain an abortion?
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
oppose
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
reasoning..
men can and do, get women pregnant all of the time and walk out and leave that woman all alone at any time well before the child is ever born, leaving the woman on her own to raise said child.. when a woman has the same chance to walk away from a pregnancy and leave the father to continue to bring that baby to full term, and also to raise that baby after it's born, then i'll consider needing a father's permission for a woman to get an abortion, but until that day arrives, i say it's bs.
men can and do, get women pregnant all of the time and walk out and leave that woman all alone at any time well before the child is ever born, leaving the woman on her own to raise said child.. when a woman has the same chance to walk away from a pregnancy and leave the father to continue to bring that baby to full term, and also to raise that baby after it's born, then i'll consider needing a father's permission for a woman to get an abortion, but until that day arrives, i say it's bs.
Los Reefersaurus
Well-Known Member
I would oppose but only if on the other foot a father can also wave all rights and responsibilities to the mother and child.
Sir Napsalot
Well-Known Member
I don't support any additional legislation regarding abortion
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
if men got stretch marks and gained weight and possibly faced losing a well paying job that they had to quit to take care of a baby because the mother walked out the door before the baby was born, then again, maybe i'd think about..
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
if men could get pregnant, guaranteed abortion would be the second amendment.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
HAF2
Well-Known Member
L-o-l
This is a common question I've heard from pro-lifers. Like the background of a situation has any bearing on it. IF they were trying to be safe, THEN they can have an abortion. But IF they weren't trying to practice safe sex, THEN the woman should be forced to carry the child to term? It's bananas I don't get it.
If someone feels an abortion is the best thing for them, they should get one. If someone hates abortions, they shouldn't get one.
Oh I also do not think the father of said cluster of cells should have veto power of an abortion. Her body her choice.
Last edited:
I was being sarcastic.
HAF2
Well-Known Member
Oh I knew that, you're not a nutter.
But it is pretty comical, or actually sad, that that's a valid "argument" the pro life people put forward.
Another question on this, how the fuck would people know if the person that said they were the father and signed their permission for the abortion was actually the father? They going to be doing in vivo paternity tests at 4 weeks? The whole thing is ridiculous.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
HAF2
Well-Known Member
srh88
Well-Known Member
also to the OP.. if the chick feels she wants an abortion noone has the right to stop her.
srh88
Well-Known Member
