Will Hillary in the White House piss the right off more than a black guy?

I think it will.

Manufactured outrage level will remain constant.

tami lohren is already pretty mad. she has already asked to speak to your supervisor.

UncleBuck said:

tami lohren is already pretty mad. she has already asked to speak to your supervisor.

Click to expand...

Tomi is so fab.

Unclebaldrick said:

I think it will.

Click to expand...

I respectfully disagree.

Everything pisses the right off. It's all about them, after all. How dare we elect a black guy twice and rub their noses in his 58% (and climbing) approval rating.

And how dare we run a fucking woman who's going to take away our guns!

No, wait a minute...the black guy already took away our guns, right?

A bunch of assholes said he would 8 yrs. ago...what happened with that?

tangerinegreen555 said:

Everything pisses the right off. It's all about them, after all. How dare we elect a black guy twice and rub their noses in his 58% (and climbing) approval rating.

And how dare we run a fucking woman who's going to take away our guns!

No, wait a minute...the black guy already took away our guns, right?

A bunch of assholes said he would 8 yrs. ago...what happened with that?

Click to expand...

are you kidding? 78% of americans don't own guns right now. so clearly obama disarmed them.

RETARD

bearkat42 said:

I respectfully disagree.

Click to expand...

I'll be listening carefully for a shift in tone from the right.

I still expect there to be plenty of foaming at the mouth, but will it be as misogynistic as it has been racist?

Unclebaldrick said:

I think it will.

Click to expand...

bearkat42 said:

I respectfully disagree.

Click to expand...

i am on both of your sides.

I think Hillary (like Bill) will be able to reach across the aisle far more than Obama did.

The traditional GOP I'd say will be delighted because she's less of a loose cannon than Trump (who could possibly shit on the Republican name for decades).

The question posed relies on the idea that a "black guy" can't be on the right.

Fail for built in racist assumptions. Next.

bearkat42 said:

I respectfully disagree.

Click to expand...

Yeah, i think you might be right. Black-Man-in-White-House drove them crazy.

Rob Roy said:

The question posed relies on the idea that a "black guy" can't be on the right.

Fail for built in racist assumptions. Next.

Click to expand...

Lol

Unclebaldrick said:

Yeah, i think you might be right. Black-Man-in-White-House drove them crazy.

Click to expand...

Yep. Historically speaking, the common racist in this country (no matter how poor they were) could always hang their hats on the "fact" that within this society at least they were better than the black people. Electing a black president into the most powerful position in the United States (or world, for that matter) basically shattered that myth, and literally sent many of them "over the edge". This is precisely why so many of them like to label President Obama as "divisive", when really the only thing that he's done to divide the country is to be the wrong color. He has, to a fault, gone out of his way to (to the consternation of many black folks) not appear divisive. However, all presidents are divisive. That is, by definition, the inevitable result of a two party system. This is also why they are trying to "make america great AGAIN". They yearn for an earlier time. A time when black folks place in society was, shall we say, a little less prominent.

They will indeed hate Hillary Clinton, mainly because her last name is "Clinton" (but also because she's a woman). Which is actually quite ironic considering the fact that Bill Clinton has easily done more harm to the black community than any republican president in modern history, but blind rage will prevent you from seeing the forest for the trees almost every time. There is NO hate, however, that compares to the hate that comes from racism. A certain percentage of the population are willing to kill in it's honor. Sexism or misogyny, generally speaking, doesn't have that same power.

bearkat42 said:

Yep. Historically speaking, the common racist in this country (no matter how poor they were) could always hang their hats on the "fact" that within this society at least they were better than the black people. Electing a black president into the most powerful position in the United States (or world, for that matter) basically shattered that myth, and literally sent many of them "over the edge". This is precisely why so many of them like to label President Obama as "divisive", when really the only thing that he's done to divide the country is to be the wrong color. All presidents are divisive. That is, by definition, the inevitable result of a two party system. This is also why so they are trying to "make america great AGAIN". They yearn for an earlier time. A time when black folks place in society was, shall we say, a little less prominent.

They will indeed hate Hillary Clinton, mainly because her last name is "Clinton" (but also because she's a woman). Which is actually quite ironic considering the fact that Bill Clinton has easily done more harm to the black community than any republican president in modern history, but blind rage will prevent you from seeing the forest for the trees almost every time. There is NO hate, however, that compares to the hate that comes from racism. A certain percentage of the population are willing to kill in it's honor. Sexism or misogyny, generally speaking, doesn't have that same power.

Click to expand...

The "divisive" thing kills me. I hear it so often out of the mouths of the right - and i wonder who the fuck they are talking about. Obama has been rational and professional his entire career. I don't know if I am happy or sad that they will be less enraged under Hillary.

Unclebaldrick said:

The "divisive" thing kills me. I hear it so often out of the mouths of the right - and i wonder who the fuck they are talking about. Obama has been rational and professional his entire career. I don't know if I am happy or sad that they will be less enraged under Hillary.

Click to expand...

Exactly. I've watched specifically his responses with regard to matters of race. He has to be extra careful with what he says so as to not offend as many (white) people as possible. In these instances he's really not "allowed" to tell the truth, quite simply, because the truth hurts.

Meanwhile, if you're a white politician:

Rob Roy said:

The question posed relies on the idea that a "black guy" can't be on the right.

Fail for built in racist assumptions. Next.

Click to expand...

The day the right elect someone black as POTUS is the day you will be willing to pay your property tax happily , whist you volunteer to teach at a public school.
Now STFU and take you meds or no applesauce for you when they serve lunch.

SneekyNinja said:

I think Hillary (like Bill) will be able to reach across the aisle far more than Obama did.

The traditional GOP I'd say will be delighted because she's less of a loose cannon than Trump (who could possibly shit on the Republican name for decades).

Click to expand...

Well that, and the fact that she's one of them.

tangerinegreen555 said:

Everything pisses the right off. It's all about them, after all. How dare we elect a black guy twice and rub their noses in his 58% (and climbing) approval rating.

And how dare we run a fucking woman who's going to take away our guns!

No, wait a minute...the black guy already took away our guns, right?

A bunch of assholes said he would 8 yrs. ago...what happened with that?

Click to expand...

So now you're calling Obama an asshole?

londonfog said:

The day the right elect someone black as POTUS is the day you will be willing to pay your property tax happily , whist you volunteer to teach at a public school.
Now STFU and take you meds or no applesauce for you when they serve lunch.

Click to expand...

So you concede your statement was racist.