Which leds to use??

NanoGadget

NanoGadget

Well-Known Member
I still have my CLW Solar Storm 440. One of the blurples ever made in my opinion. I definitely prefer my HLG QB, but for 3 or 4 year old tech my 440 still kicks ass.
 
CikaBika

CikaBika

Well-Known Member
canadian1969 said:
I dont know where did learn your grammar. but 1.79*1.3=2.3 for a 30% diff lol I am pretty fried atm but I think I did that right.
Click to expand...
Wtf are u Writing.. You said that qb has 2.3 and clw 1.7 and that quantum board has 2x more umols.. where did yoi pull this bullshit in you reply.. I learned foreign laungage 20u ago.. What's your foreign laungage grammar?? And @CobKits demand you also.. But hey my grammar is topic..
 
skoomd

skoomd

Well-Known Member
CikaBika said:
Wtf are u Writing.. You said that qb has 2.3 and clw 1.7 and that quantum board has 2x more umols.. where did yoi pull this bullshit in you reply.. I learned foreign laungage 20u ago.. What's your foreign laungage grammar?? And @CobKits demand you also.. But hey my grammar is topic..
Click to expand...
He wasn't the one who said that, I did. Chill bro, here is where those numbers come from.


The California light works Solar Storm 275 is 1.7 umol/j and 200 watts for 350 PPF according to this data sheet (and the one on every other vendor's site) https://hydrobuilder.com/media/pdf/specs/SolarSystem-275-web.pdf

HOWEVER, the reason Cobkits got different numbers is because the data sheet on the the actual site has 2.23 umol/j and 200 watts, for 439 PPF. Which is where the confusion came in.

This is probably because they updated the fixture with newer tech and the vendors didnt update the data sheet link.

Just a misunderstanding.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top