Way to Go Vince Mcallister

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
do you think they'll be calling for his resignation for his actual infidelity, just like they did with anthony weiner for his e-infidelity?

:lol:

nope. they're fucking hypocrites. that's why.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Ah, except they already have. The La GOP, Republican media pundits and more comments on political forums than I can count. If I were a betting man, he's probably being flooded with constituents calling for his resignation. Another utter ""Bucky" failure. You should stick to butchering basic math, rather than asking a question, incorrectly assuming an answer and then flinging insults based on the incorrect assumption.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ah, except they already have. The La GOP, Republican media pundits and more comments on political forums than I can count. If I were a betting man, he's probably being flooded with constituents calling for his resignation. Another utter ""Bucky" failure. You should stick to butchering basic math, rather than asking a question, incorrectly assuming an answer and then flinging insults based on the incorrect assumption.
you'd make a good dreidel with the way you spin.

this is a whisper compared to the roar we heard about anthony weiner. proof: turn on fox news.

yet another muyloco failure.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
you'd make a good dreidel with the way you spin.

this is a whisper compared to the roar we heard about anthony weiner. proof: turn on fox news.

yet another muyloco failure.

If you think a man sending pictures of his dick to various and sundry anonymous people on the internet is "e infidelity" as opposed to a creepy perversion, you might be a Democrat.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If you think a man sending pictures of his dick to various and sundry anonymous people on the internet is "e infidelity" as opposed to a creepy perversion, you might be a Democrat.
all consensual.

when you and your old, saggy, overweight wife get undressed and you pop those blue pills, is it creepy perversion or your anniversary?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Name Calling or general rude behavior is no longer acceptable in the Cafe, We are adults which means that we should be able to debate without resorting to name calling. Warnings will be given out if users fail to act appropriately.

I certainly hope a strongly worded PM was sent by the mods. Let that be a lesson to you!
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Was it consensual?
What does it matter whether it was consensual? He was unfaithful to his wife and a hypocrite and a perv. Why would you want to embrace a person like that?

The "victims" of his weiner wagging outed him, so it sure doesn't seem consensual to me. Not that it matters. You and Buck just keep right on waiving his flag, though. It's amusing.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
What does it matter whether it was consensual? He was unfaithful to his wife and a hypocrite and a perv. Why would you want to embrace a person like that?

The "victims" of his weiner wagging outed him, so it sure doesn't seem consensual to me. Not that it matters. You and Buck just keep right on waiving his flag, though. It's amusing.
What victims? They asked for the photos. And as to his wife? Is she still with him? Maybe he had her permission. Not like he stuck his tongue down any of their throats
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
What victims? They asked for the photos. And as to his wife? Is she still with him? Maybe he had her permission. Not like he stuck his tongue down any of their throats
Buck should tweet him and pretend to be a hot Democratic girl like he did with an RIU member. I'll bet he could get a picture of the weiner for himself.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Buck should tweet him and pretend to be a hot Democratic girl like he did with an RIU member. I'll bet he could get a picture of the weiner for himself.
you sound bitter about me chasing off your white supremacist friend and group mate.

most people see the eviction of white supremacists from our site as a good thing. it sure was one of my better trolling moments, i laughed to myself for days about that one.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
you sound bitter about me chasing off your white supremacist friend and group mate.

most people see the eviction of white supremacists from our site as a good thing. it sure was one of my better trolling moments, i laughed to myself for days about that one.
Indeed, most people heartily approve of censoring the other guy. What could go wrong?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Indeed, most people heartily approve of censoring the other guy. What could go wrong?
i never censored him, he is still free to post here at will.

i'm sure you get sad when i chase off holocaust denying, white supremacist neo-nazis. you did join his group after all.

"birds of a feather..."
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Your misogyny is peeking from under garter belt, Buck.

Here is a quote from a commenter,tscha, at Jezebel that accurately describes the weeny disseminating Democrat:

"You're kidding me, right? In response to supportive tweets, he sent unsolicited dick pics. He did this to an African-American college student who tweeted him in support of his politics. A woman trying to discuss politics or business or industry or anything else really shouldn't have to brace herself for a dick pic. It speaks volumes about how he views women that no matter what the context (this wasn't Adult Friend Finder, FFS), a woman is fair game for harassment."
http://jezebel.com/whatever-voting-for-anthony-weiner-doesnt-make-you-a-646690810
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Weiner, the creeping pedophile that Buck wants in office:

"Democratic women on Capitol Hill stood by Weiner and his Twitter tawdriness until a critical moment almost exactly two years ago this week: It was the moment news broke that among the bevy of online groupies he hit on, Weiner had communicated with at least one teenage high-school student in Delaware.

Weiner had flirted with the underage girl through Twitter direct messages using a macho line about donning “cape and tights” — a quip he had also used with an adult woman with whom he had exchanged raunchier sexually explicit messages. Conservative blogger Patrick Frey (patterico.com) first uncovered the evidence. Fox News then broke the news in the mainstream media that Delaware police had visited the girl’s home and questioned her about her online communications with Weiner. The 17-year-old said she had met Weiner on a school trip to Washington.

At his watershed press-conference circus on June 6, 2011, Weiner claimed he “never had an intention of having a relationship with underage women” and blustered that the girls he communicated with “weren’t young, per se.” Per se? Just a few days later, Weiner was forced to admit that he had exchanged “at least five private messages on Twitter” with the Delaware girl, not two messages as initially reported. He also denied that any messages to the teen were “explicit” or “indecent.”"
 
Top