trayvan martin

desert dude said:

Trayvon might have grown up and become a decent guy, we will never know. Unfortunately for him, he tried to murder a guy and came up short. Shit happens.

Click to expand...

so black people are not allowed to defend themselves?

UncleBuck said:

so black people are not allowed to defend themselves?

Click to expand...

Treyvon attacked the Hero Zimmerman and got smited by his righteousness.

Offence =/= Defence

UncleBuck said:

so black people are not allowed to defend themselves?

Click to expand...

not according to snitch man Desert Dude

Harrekin said:

Treyvon attacked the Hero Zimmerman and got smited by his righteousness.

Offence =/= Defence

Click to expand...

Someone following you what would you do ?

londonfog said:

not according to snitch man Desert Dude

Click to expand...

Its a shame the "brothers" cant concentrate on not killing each other instead of how evil the big bad white man is, who is the root of every black mans "disability".

Harrekin said:

Treyvon attacked the Hero Zimmerman and got smited by his righteousness.

Offence =/= Defence

Click to expand...

so if some stranger tails you in his truck on your way home, then gets out of his truck once you run and takes two flashlights and a gun out there to look for you in the dark, you're supposed to just submit to whatever this creepy stranger is gonna do to you?

are you honestly gonna tell me that you don't fear for your life or bodily harm at that point?

you think that creepy stranger is following you home in the dark to give you some long stemmed roses and chocolates or something?

londonfog said:

Someone following you what would you do ?

Click to expand...

Probably not hide and then jump the person, who might be armed.

londonfog said:

not according to snitch man Desert Dude

Click to expand...

nodrama said the same thing too.

Harrekin said:

Its a shame the "brothers" cant concentrate on not killing each other instead of how evil the big bad white man is, who is the root of every black mans "disability".

Click to expand...

so you saying they should concentrate on killing white people???

Harrekin said:

Probably not hide and then jump the person, who might be armed.

Click to expand...

what evidence do you have of that happening, besides a consistently evolving story from zimmerman with 14+ lies within said story?

londonfog said:

so you saying they should concentrate on killing white people???

Click to expand...

Less killing overall is probably a better goal, but one step at a time.

UncleBuck said:

what evidence do you have of that happening, besides a consistently evolving story from zimmerman with 14+ lies within said story?

Click to expand...

Eye witness testimony consistent with medical reports and police investigation?

A court ruling?

What have you got, Tray-scuttle?

Harrekin said:

Eye witness testimony consistent with medical reports and police investigation?

Click to expand...

what eye witness testimony (not from a known liar) or medical reports said martin hid and then jumped a person?

UncleBuck said:

what eye witness testimony (not from a known liar) or medical reports said martin hid and then jumped a person?

Click to expand...

There's only one eye witness, exonerated by the Florida courts.

One less thug on the streets.

Win Win IMO, bus drivers won't even have to worry bout getting beat on anymore.

It's sad. Trayvon has been dead for two years and the progs are still in fantasy land about what happened. Racist much, guys?

desert dude said:

It's sad. Trayvon has been dead for two years and the progs are still in fantasy land about what happened. Racist much, guys?

Click to expand...

didn't you join a white supremacy group?

Goebbels, why do you think the first amendment is a white supremacy concept?

UncleBuck said:

so if some stranger tails you in his truck on your way home, then gets out of his truck once you run and takes two flashlights and a gun out there to look for you in the dark, you're supposed to just submit to whatever this creepy stranger is gonna do to you?

are you honestly gonna tell me that you don't fear for your life or bodily harm at that point?

you think that creepy stranger is following you home in the dark to give you some long stemmed roses and chocolates or something?

Click to expand...

The problem your argument has is the view of self defense. Your narrative contemplates an objective standard for self defense. It is as if you feel treyvan was the only one entitled to self defense because Z followed him.

If treyvan had killed Z, I wouldn't have a problem with his self defense argument. I could believe it possible that Z frightened him.

The problem for your argument is that self defense is subjective and Z's actions were legal. It's legal to walk behind people.

Z never broke any laws, even if he scared treyvan into attacking him. At that point Z was also in reasonable fear for his life.

The circumstances of this event are such that either man could have killed the other. Treyvan was justified to fear for being followed, Z was justified because it's not illegal to follow, and then he was attacked and killed his attacker.

desert dude said:

Goebbels, why do you think the first amendment is a white supremacy concept?

Click to expand...

i think it's you who takes that approach. you're the one who said that the first amendment gives you a right to white separatism.

desert dude said:

Yeah, the Florida criminal justice system has a clause that says white-hispanic guys on trial only have to face a jury of six "rather than the regular 12 required for real people".

Lard, you claim to be studying law. Hahahahahahhahahaha. Where's Bucky? You need Bucky.

LULZ

Click to expand...

i'm not studying law, desert dud.