The state owns you and your children

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
What do you think does the state own you or do you?


Excerpted from an article by Butler Shaffer

Contrary to popular belief, the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution did not end slavery: it nationalized the practice. Only the state can now own people.

This can be seen in all kinds of governmental practices. From the power to tax a person’s earnings, to the compulsory schooling of children, to military or jury duty conscription, to what you may/may not put into your body, to whether you may commit suicide, and numerous other political controls over what you mistakenly consider to be “your” person, the state insists upon the same control over you that a cattle rancher has over his livestock, and for the same reasons. Lest you think that government officials have any doubts about this, consider the dissenting opinion of Justice Harlan, in the 1905 U.S. Supreme Court case Lochner v. New York, a case that struck down a state statute limiting the number of hours employees could work in a bakery. Work for more than the maximum hours allowed by the statute could, Harlan stated, “endanger the health and shorten the lives of the workmen, thereby diminishing their physical and mental capacityto serve the state and to provide for those dependent upon them” (emphasis added).

This same logic is now driving efforts, in various states, to compel parents to vaccinate their children, a purpose designed not to protect children, but “to serve” the profit ambitions of the corporate-state’s Big-Pharma subsidiaries. Randolph Bourne’s phrase “war is the health of the state” is now transformed into health being part of the battleground for the state’s endless war against us all.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
What do you think does the state own you or do you?


Excerpted from an article by Butler Shaffer

Contrary to popular belief, the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution did not end slavery: it nationalized the practice. Only the state can now own people.

This can be seen in all kinds of governmental practices. From the power to tax a person’s earnings, to the compulsory schooling of children, to military or jury duty conscription, to what you may/may not put into your body, to whether you may commit suicide, and numerous other political controls over what you mistakenly consider to be “your” person, the state insists upon the same control over you that a cattle rancher has over his livestock, and for the same reasons. Lest you think that government officials have any doubts about this, consider the dissenting opinion of Justice Harlan, in the 1905 U.S. Supreme Court case Lochner v. New York, a case that struck down a state statute limiting the number of hours employees could work in a bakery. Work for more than the maximum hours allowed by the statute could, Harlan stated, “endanger the health and shorten the lives of the workmen, thereby diminishing their physical and mental capacityto serve the state and to provide for those dependent upon them” (emphasis added).

This same logic is now driving efforts, in various states, to compel parents to vaccinate their children, a purpose designed not to protect children, but “to serve” the profit ambitions of the corporate-state’s Big-Pharma subsidiaries. Randolph Bourne’s phrase “war is the health of the state” is now transformed into health being part of the battleground for the state’s endless war against us all.
I usually agree with what you say, but the Anti-Vax crowd are a bunch of lunatics.
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
I wanna run my road grinder down your street 24/7 til I`m done, the neighborhood says no,...Who should I go to Rob ?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I wanna run my road grinder down your street 24/7 til I`m done, the neighborhood says no,...Who should I go to Rob ?
Who owns the road is the first thing you'd want to define.

Also, if you're running a road grinder down a road that isn't yours, without the permission of the owner(s) aren't you potentially creating some kind of victim ? When you create a victim, its good manners to restitute them.

if you are in the process of creating a victim, does the victim have a right to defend themself / their property or seek the services of somebody that can defend them or their property?
 

OddBall1st

Well-Known Member
Who owns the road is the first thing you'd want to define.

Also, if you're running a road grinder down a road that isn't yours, without the permission of the owner(s) aren't you potentially creating some kind of victim ? When you create a victim, its good manners to restitute them.

if you are in the process of creating a victim, does the victim have a right to defend themself / their property or seek the services of somebody that can defend them or their property?


Ownership is not of relative significance because the insurance company lost a court battle and are paying for their clients negligence. (tanker leaked Thin-X all down four streets in town, I`m doing this one) I got a wedding on Monday that I can`t pay for unless I get paid on Saturday when I finish. I can do it by running 24/7.

As to the question, ..... I am, and they are.

Who should I go to Rob ?
 
Top