the difference between democrats and republicans
- Thread starter UncleBuck
- Start date
CA MTN MAN
Well-Known Member
Look at the largest climb per year.... It's the year Obama took office hahaha
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
You're not too bright are you?
kinda gives new meaning when the GOP says 'they want to fix this country'..yeah, you can bet they want to 'fix' it and have the economy crash and burn.
if you are worried about the debt and deficits, vote for a democrat. they will fix it.
republicans will only make it worse.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you're kidding, right?
obama took office in 2009, inheriting the 1.539 trillion dollar surplus. dummy.
WeedFreak78
Well-Known Member
The only difference is if they have a D or a R after their name. Charts like this are way too misleading, it takes years for economics to play out..I've never like attributing stuff to the current admin, as much as i may not like them, they are dealing with repercussions from previous admins. Regan/Bush policies probably fed into Clintons economic success, and some of his policies probably led to the younger Bushes failure, etc,etc. Not to say they all didn't affect the economy, I just don't see it being as immediately influential as most think
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
if you are worried about the debt and deficits, vote for a democrat. they will fix it.
republicans will only make it worse.
See ??
WeedFreak78
Well-Known Member
Oh WTF.... RAPPPPPEEEE!! Wait, what?
see4
Well-Known Member
1,000 billions makes a trillion. Which would mean 1.539 trillion is accurate.
Does it suck to be as stupid as you are? Or do you not even realize it?
what UB didn't mean though was deficit, not surplus, unless of course he was being sarcastic. do you want me to define what sarcastic means?
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
It`s not what the chart says, can you explain the .22 and placement of Bucks decimal. ? You`ll find it to be not what Buck posted to show when Obama took office. Buck did not type what his chart says.... either his chart example is wrong, or Buck is.
see4
Well-Known Member
No. It explains that you are a fucking retard.
1539.22 in billions = 1.53922 trillion = $1,539,220,000,000
In the grand scheme of things, when trying to make a point, $220,000,000 out of $1,539,220,000,000 isn't really insignificant.
Because you are dumb as shit, you didn't realize that 1539.22 in billions (rounded) was in fact 1.539 trillion, which is exactly what UB said.
What UB however did was state it was surplus, and we all know that Bush left us with a deficit, as do ALL 21st century Republicans. They leave us with shit to clean up.
I'm wasting my breathe with you because you are too fucking stupid to see it. Because you are just beyond fucking dumb. You are so fucking dumb its actually beginning to hurt my feelings.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Your numbers include the two`s, Bucks did not. He stated 1.539 which isn`t 1539.22 or 1.53922, or $1,539,220,000,000
Small brain, small fuck-up, by Buck and failure to clear it up by a small dick package of explosives...
Buck was wrong or his chart is incorrect...
see4
Well-Known Member
No asshat, when talking in trillions of dollars, 220 million is very insignificant. You clearly are wrong, you were wrong, are wrong now, and will always be wrong. You thought you caught him up, thinking the number was billions, and then after you posted and got called out, you back pedal and try to blame it on him not stating, 1.53922 trillion. Which we all know is totally irrelevant.
God damnit you guys are so fucking stupid. Really it is starting to hurt my feelings.
potroastV2
Well-Known Member
Ease up on them, Man!
They can't help it.
They can't help it.
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
OddBall1st
Well-Known Member
Ease up on them, Man!
They can't help it.
abandonconflict could use a hug about now,....why don`t ya head on thata way...I don`t need no stinkin hugs...
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
no, i have it in the right spot.
you're just incredibly dumb and don't mind opening your mouth to prove it.