Terpinator

941mick

941mick

Well-Known Member
greenghost420 said:
my coconut water has potassium . i used molasses but will see how changing out molasses for coconut water does. all the shit i listed is available from microbe life. aminos vitamins, humics vulvics, and bennys. most of microbe lifes shit had added PK. though i havent tried microbe life yet, its on the shopping list
Click to expand...
Photosynthesis Plus is probably the best thing I have ever added to my regimen. Noticed the effect immediately in all stages of growth.
 
ballaboyee21

ballaboyee21

Well-Known Member
941Mick - That shows that minimum detection limit there does not actually mean it contains that amount. All the nutrients are going to have those stats unless they actually detected more than that. They are saying that is when their machine will pick it up. "The symbol "<" indicates the minimum detection limit. The metal was not found at or above the minimum detection limit."
 
941mick

941mick

Well-Known Member
ballaboyee21 said:
941Mick - That shows that minimum detection limit there does not actually mean it contains that amount. All the nutrients are going to have those stats unless they actually detected more than that. They are saying that is when their machine will pick it up. "The symbol "<" indicates the minimum detection limit. The metal was not found at or above the minimum detection limit."
Click to expand...
Your right! My bad!
 
Tim MacIntyre

Tim MacIntyre

Member
TRAP5TAR ALUMN1 said:
Anyone ever use the nute called Terpinator???

If so does it actually work and produce the results it claims???
Click to expand...
I'm a happy and repeat customer it's got a perminate spot in my nutrient line up and I deff did notice a increase in my plants resin glands and its production of essential oils increased also. Overal potency quality taste n smell to me honestly seem to b elevated from before , but this is only my opinion which was based on my personal observation between a harvest with out terpinator in the feedings to a harvest with terpinator in the feeding Schedual , and to me the final product that had terpinator was far superior
 
Tim MacIntyre

Tim MacIntyre

Member
I a
Clown Baby said:

LOL. seems legit.

ballaboyee21, im not denying that you have good bud. i believe that you do, and i am glad. What I'm denying is your claim that terpinator has anything to do with it. All of the available information on this product is marketing rhetoric. This product is as legit as AN selling yeast hulls as B-52 for $120/gallon.

But it's your money, so i guess if you really believe in it, go ahead and support your local shop.
Click to expand...
gree with vid deff brought out sum good in my garden for sure
 
greenghost420

greenghost420

Well-Known Member
while coconut can be expensive, molasses seems cheap and contains potassium. i think ill alternate one week molasses oneweek coco water
 
CashCrops

CashCrops

Well-Known Member
Would be nice to see a controlled environment test done with 24 clones of the same strain and lab results of 12 with and 12 without, but then done again to see repeat results. I would think a company that is selling said product would spend the money on the tests
 
GrowerGoneWild

GrowerGoneWild

Well-Known Member
CashCrops said:
Would be nice to see a controlled environment test done with 24 clones of the same strain and lab results of 12 with and 12 without, but then done again to see repeat results. I would think a company that is selling said product would spend the money on the tests
Click to expand...
I'm doing my own testing, Im running without terpinator this run, Organic soil not treated, and Organic hydro not treated.. so far organic soil not treated smells closer to weed treated with terpinator. When I was pheno fishing I found grapefruit phenotype in my C99's. The soil one has more of a sweeter punch to it, similar to the c99 I had before treated with terpinator, in organic hydro. Not a huge difference but there is one. Smoke report will come later because I'm 3 or 4 weeks from pulling them down.

There seems to be more ancedotal evidence supporting terpinator, the "does not work" side tends to post more about the negatives without any real details or they perpetuate inaccurate information, like the heavy metals report. The washington fertilizer report shows no detectable heavy metals. Or claims that their organic formula is better than terpinator, with no effort to prove otherwise.

I'll try terpinator again, I have a bunch of Girl Scout cookies to run soon, so I'll be flooded with that strain, so it will be easy for me to do side by sides. I had the clones flowers tested, so I know its baseline output with non terpinator treated.

http://analytical360.com/m/expired/256771

I guess all I have to do is submit my treated flowers with terpinator...
 
CashCrops

CashCrops

Well-Known Member
GrowerGoneWild said:
I'm doing my own testing, Im running without terpinator this run, Organic soil not treated, and Organic hydro not treated.. so far organic soil not treated smells closer to weed treated with terpinator. When I was pheno fishing I found grapefruit phenotype in my C99's. The soil one has more of a sweeter punch to it, similar to the c99 I had before treated with terpinator, in organic hydro. Not a huge difference but there is one. Smoke report will come later because I'm 3 or 4 weeks from pulling them down.

There seems to be more ancedotal evidence supporting terpinator, the "does not work" side tends to post more about the negatives without any real details or they perpetuate inaccurate information, like the heavy metals report. The washington fertilizer report shows no detectable heavy metals. Or claims that their organic formula is better than terpinator, with no effort to prove otherwise.

I'll try terpinator again, I have a bunch of Girl Scout cookies to run soon, so I'll be flooded with that strain, so it will be easy for me to do side by sides. I had the clones flowers tested, so I know its baseline output with non terpinator treated.

http://analytical360.com/m/expired/256771

I guess all I have to do is submit my treated flowers with terpinator...
Click to expand...
Lab tested finished buds showing a terp profile would be nicer
 
CashCrops

CashCrops

Well-Known Member
GrowerGoneWild said:
Sure.. when get these GSC's in.. then it will be sent there for testing.
Click to expand...
Sweet, look forward to it. Iv'e been working on my own formula to increase Terpines and am hopeful that when I get labs back that there will be good increases. Iv'e been running a Critical Jack Herer for two years now and it's already a nice producer.
 
TonightYou

TonightYou

Well-Known Member
GrowerGoneWild said:
I'm doing my own testing, Im running without terpinator this run, Organic soil not treated, and Organic hydro not treated.. so far organic soil not treated smells closer to weed treated with terpinator. When I was pheno fishing I found grapefruit phenotype in my C99's. The soil one has more of a sweeter punch to it, similar to the c99 I had before treated with terpinator, in organic hydro. Not a huge difference but there is one. Smoke report will come later because I'm 3 or 4 weeks from pulling them down.

There seems to be more ancedotal evidence supporting terpinator, the "does not work" side tends to post more about the negatives without any real details or they perpetuate inaccurate information, like the heavy metals report. The washington fertilizer report shows no detectable heavy metals. Or claims that their organic formula is better than terpinator, with no effort to prove otherwise.

I'll try terpinator again, I have a bunch of Girl Scout cookies to run soon, so I'll be flooded with that strain, so it will be easy for me to do side by sides. I had the clones flowers tested, so I know its baseline output with non terpinator treated.

http://analytical360.com/m/expired/256771

I guess all I have to do is submit my treated flowers with terpinator...
Click to expand...
I like the fact you are trying to figure out if this product works but there are some issues with the procedures and questions on subjectivity. I do think the testing is the best of figuring out differences. Remember in science, the burden of proof lies on who's making a claim. Testing should help figure out differences, if statistically significant, better than one's nose.

With regards to the procedures, are all constants being applied to both the treated and untreated plants? Is the time to harvest, temperature, clones being the same height or close enough? Is feeding the same for tested/untested? These things matter if you are truly wanting to test the claims made by a company. If anything, claims to the contrary are anecdotes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top