Team Obama Likely Swayed ‘Cooked Books’ ISIS Reports

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Investigation has been going on since September. Obama has "shaven" numbers to look like we are making progress, as ISIS continued to grow in powers, numbers, and scope. Same accusations about the numbers with the Taliban. Were those numbers "cooked"?

This is some serious stuff, total dishonesty and mistrust aside.

When we the people lie to the IRS, it's against the law. When a politician lies, it's just politics as usual.


"On Monday’s Morning Joe, the show’s panel discussed the state of internal documents regarding the growing threat of the Islamic State. In the wake of reports that particular documents may have been altered discussing the rise of ISIS in recent years, co-host Joe Scarborough discussed the relationship between the Obama administration’s narrative and intelligence documents.
Mika Brzezinski cited a New York Times article, saying “Over the summer analysts went to the Inspector General claiming to have evidence that their superiors doctored the reports to show greater progress from U.S. airstrikes. But what we don’t know is if those reports swayed the Obama administration in it’s approach to ISIS—” http://www.mediaite.com/tv/morning-joe-panel-admits-obama-narrative-likely-swayed-cooked-books-isis-reports/


Did the Pentagon Cook the Books on Its Afghanistan Intel?
Lawmakers are probing whether senior U.S. military officers skewed intelligence reports about Afghanistan, raising new questions about whether policymakers can trust the accuracy of the Pentagon’s assessments of the nation’s wars.
The investigation, which has not been reported previously, adds a new dimension to the politically explosive scandal hanging over the military’s Central Command, where top officers stand accused of deliberately skewing their analysis of the campaign against the Islamic State to exaggerate successes while downplaying serious setbacks.
http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/11/19/did-the-pentagon-cook-the-books-on-its-afghanistan-intel/
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Barry O's initials are B.O. and everything he does smells funky. Is Obama still dropping leaflets for ISIS giving them 45 minutes warning about upcoming air strikes? He cares more about the lives of his jayvee team, than he does the lives of our US Military (varsity team)
 

Siino Gardens

Well-Known Member
we can only hope that someone else takes it upon themselves to rid the world of isis. America is fueling a fire, not bringing it down.
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Did we not learn from our mistakes the first go around?
23% of Americans believe Obama has a clear stradegy for defeating ISIS. John Kerry is warning Americans abroad not to travel, because terrorism is spreading. Water boarding works, and it keeps America safe.

Let me ask you something. When Obama bombs their oil tankers, do you think that makes ISIS like us, or want to attack us? There is no such thing as a politically correct war. This may not be nuance enough for you, but the purpose of war is to kill people and blow shit up until the other side surrenders.
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Explain to be what your perception of "works" is. Because you are aware that Dubya used waterboarding, right? You are aware that we still have numerous terrorist organizations, even after extensive waterboarding, right? Not sure why you think it works but give me your best shot.
Enhanced interigation techniques provide intel, such as information leading to the killing of people like Osama Bin Laden.
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
You know I believe everything you say but just for the good people of RIU, can you cite your source. Thank you, not that I don't believe you but...


View attachment 3550072
Couldn't help but notice that I've been answering your questions, but you have skipped over mine. I'll cite how water boarding works, if you go back and answer one of my questions.

We need to keep it fair
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
No. That was easy. Citation please?
So how is water boarding any different? I can guarantee you that ISIS is more pissed about Obama attacking their 3 million dollar a day economy, than they are about water boarding. You can't defeat your enemy in a nice way. That's not how it works
 

2ANONYMOUS

Well-Known Member
The sooner we realize who is fueling, arming and feeding ISIS the sooner, the world will know who the real evil on Earth is , with the probability of 80 percent of Americans who if ?? given a map would not even know where Syria is,
But think there doing a fine job is rather hilarious its not wonder there in the shape that there in today, and with Obama back peddling now thinking there still is a chance to over throw Syrian Government, its going to be another embarrassment USA has shown the world ..
Truth is don't start something you could never Finish in the first place like 99 percent of all wars USA has started ends up in a embarrassment
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
The sooner we realize who is fueling, arming and feeding ISIS the sooner, the world will know who the real evil on Earth is , with the probability of 80 percent of Americans who if ?? given a map would not even know where Syria is,
But think there doing a fine job is rather hilarious its not wonder there in the shape that there in today, and with Obama back peddling now thinking there still is a chance to over throw Syrian Government, its going to be another embarrassment USA has shown the world ..
Truth is don't start something you could never Finish in the first place like 99 percent of all wars USA has started ends up in a embarrassment

We already know. Obama has been arming the so called "rebels" for years now.
 

2ANONYMOUS

Well-Known Member
How bad is it in Iraq today? Here's one way to answer the question: The government in Baghdad just allowed Russia to start bombing targets on Iraq's home soil.
The territory in question, of course, now belongs to the Islamic State. And the decision, reports by the International Business Times, "comes just days after a U.S. diplomatic envoy sought assurances from the Baghdad government that it would not allow Russian jets to conduct operations inside Iraq."

That makes this a big embarrassment for America. And it's hardly the only one.

Consider the painful spectacle of the most recent U.S. special forces raid against ISIS — the first to result in a death among our troops since the White House returned us to the Iraq war it once so proudly ended. The raid was called in at the request of our only competent allies in Iraq, the Kurds. As The New York Times recounted, ISIS had imprisoned a host of Iraqi soldiers, readying a massacre, with "a number of peshmerga fighters, as the Kurdish forces are known," among the soon-to-be-victims. Despite their tenacity, the Kurds doubted they could save their men alone. In came U.S. special forces.

The roughly 70 prisoners freed by the intervention weren't the ones America expected to find. And despite the fact that "the raid was the first time American soldiers had been confirmed to be directly accompanying local forces in Iraq onto the battlefield against the Islamic State since President Obama sent troops back to the country last year," Washington downplayed its significance.

MORE PERSPECTIVESPAUL WALDMAN

The dark depths of conservative despair

RYAN COOPER
Donald Trump's alarming skid toward outright fascism

"This was a unique circumstance in which very close partners of the United States made a specific request for our assistance," said Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook. "So I would not suggest that this is something that's going to now happen on a regular basis."
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
You can't even spell but you want people to take you seriously?
intel? That is short for "intelligence" .... of which you have none


1. It would help if you learned how to use a comma.
2. Why are Democrats trying to suck their own dicks all the time?
 
Top