Sometimes it is beneficial to rip your own argument down from the perspective of your opposition in order to shore up your arguments. While I admire your ambition, maybe a more well planned and calculated approach should be considered before more legal precedent is set in favor of the opposition. Crazy is trying the same thing and expecting a different outcome. As we have seen saying we are right is not enough to convince anyone else and we definitely are not looking to convince each other. No offense but why should we blindly throw our money at this and expect it to be different that what just happened? I am asking this very seriously with the intentions of supporting a cogent and plausible solution to getting rid of the 25 mile rule.