Ron Paul is in second place

deprave

New Member
Yes exactly, but do you see my point it really turns the whole bleeding heart argument up on its head if they want to include earmarks as their argument?...hilarious isn't it?

Their whole argument is that Ron Paul won't take care of people and now they use this tangible evidence that Ron Paul is taking care of people as their smear of him being 'Pork King' ....fucking devilishly hilarious...

One example we have Ron Paul giving money toward emergency relief! Then you have their argument that Ron Paul wants to eliminate FEMA therefore a doomsday scenario will play out in lala land where fema helps people in that we will be abandoned in an emergency or something lol.. it really collapses all of their bullshit arguments its just lovely...
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ron paul votes against the budget, but takes the money anyway.

what a man of principle :roll:

more like: typical politician.
 

Purplestickeypunch

Active Member
ron paul votes against the budget, but takes the money anyway.

what a man of principle :roll:

more like: typical politician.
Ron Paul believes that as Article 1 of the Constitution states, taxes can only be levied when congress names the expense, thus every dime SHOULD Be earmarked and not freely given as the leadership desires to the people with the "most need". An earmark does not change the amount of the bill. it specifically identifies where the cash is going... We are used to hearing about these "pet projects" called earmarks as well and then deciding that they are all bad...
 

budlover13

King Tut
ron paul votes against the budget, but takes the money anyway.

what a man of principle :roll:

more like: typical politician.
FAR from typical. Can't deny that ;)

i say brilliant! And loyal to the people who put him into office not because they do him favors and give him stuff but because he took an oath to.

FAR from typical.
 

*BUDS

Well-Known Member
Forget the polls they are bullshit. Go by bookies odds as their livelyhood depends on being correct and they usually are.
heres the odds- Romney- $2.10 Gingrich- $2.90 Paul- $18 Huntsman- $20
Looks like 2 chances only.
If you think Ron paul can win then put your money where your mouth is @ 17-1.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Forget the polls they are bullshit. Go by bookies odds as their livelyhood depends on being correct and they usually are.
heres the odds- Romney- $2.10 Gingrich- $2.90 Paul- $18 Huntsman- $20
Looks like 2 chances only.
If you think Ron paul can win then put your money where your mouth is @ 17-1.
Iv won big bets on odds of 170/1...never underestimate a horse, they can surprise you in the final straight.
 

deprave

New Member
where do those odds even come from? thats like your buddy or something? I have to say I have followed every presidential election closely for a long time and I haven't been wrong yet. This could be a first but I am doubting it more and more everyday...Where can I place my bet on this?
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
where do those odds even come from? thats like your buddy or something? I have to say I have followed every presidential election closely for a long time and I haven't been wrong yet. This could be a first but I am doubting it more and more everyday...Where can I place my bet on this?
If you do get 17/1 odds then you're buying the drinks after the primaries! ;)

If you don't elect RP can we have him maybe? There's another Republic right here that needs that sorta man at the helm, so we'll take him off your hands if you refuse to elect him again...seriously.
 
Top