Ready for flush? Week 6

AllenHaze

Well-Known Member
Again. You sound insane. You take things so far out of context - something I already predicted. Alas, you posted too quickly yet again. If it has been this easy for me to find supporting evidence for my side of the argument why has it been so difficult for you? "Winning?" No, I said Jorge wins. I never said I won anything. RO water removes many of the ions from the water so why are you comparing RO water to rain water?Again, an issue with context. How many growers actually have ro water by comparison to tap water? :hug:
 

AllenHaze

Well-Known Member
More confirmation bias in a blind pursuit to patch your ego. What it says it that leaves are protected against excessive leaching. As the other documents, it proves my point you ignorant fucker.
Why would the plant need to evolve such a mechanism against leaching if there wasn't a need to do so in the first place? Where are your citations btw.
 

Sativied

Well-Known Member
Again. You sound insane. [keep trying to convince yourself ;) ] You take things so far out of context - something I already predicted. Alas, you posted too quickly yet again [ahum..."I" did? Perhaps you're just a lil slow...]. "Winning?" No, I said Jorge wins. I never said I won anything.
You reflected your emotions here:
You're desperate to win this
The fact you dismiss a simple test yet resort to docs about storms, rains, and acid rain washing apparatus to make your point says enough about your intentions. It's really not that hard to test... and then if you're right you're right so what are you afraid of (rhetorical... answer is obvious). So far you have not presented a single valid argument, just misinterpretations of documents you'd probably be better off not reading. As I explained initially, that's why people like Jorge write books with dumbed down info, so you can have some basic understanding enabling you to grow mj.

If it has been this easy for me to find supporting evidence for my side of the argument
You're delusional... and starting to go from being entertaining to just sad. You can pretend to have shown any sources and citations that make my comment about it being poorly worded any less valid, the reality is on the contrary and does not require me to show sources that a pig can't fly and you can't fuck a canary anally, your lack of proof doesn't shift the burden of it. Learn about pigs and canaries and you'll understand.

Why would the plant need to evolve such a mechanism against leaching if there wasn't a need to do so in the first place?
To prevent "reverse foliar feeding" by Jorge? :rolleyes::wall:

Sativied said:
*FYI: most people here aren't even capable of realizing when they lost a debate...
Hint hint... Get your head out of your ass, live up to that "no hard feelings" (I certainly don't do online grudges, I don't even remember half the member's names I made butthurt) and take my initial well-meant advice that ticked you off.

Since I aim to be intellectual honest, which isn't easy by any means, I'm always interested in how others fool themselves so I can potentially recognize and avoid that myself. So let me ask you something, when you read and decided to use STinkyAttic's comment as an argument, did you really not realize how desperate you are?

Bonus mind fuck II: foliar feeding can increase the amount of nutrients in the soil.

Hypocrite. :peace:
 

AllenHaze

Well-Known Member
Look at the image below detailing "Heirarchy of Disagreement". Do you see where exactly you fall in this heiarchy? Everyone can see it.
Intellectual Honesty:
One's personal beliefs do not interfere with the pursuit of truth;
Relevant facts and information are not purposefully omitted even when such things may contradict one's hypothesis;
Facts are presented in an unbiased manner, and not twisted to give misleading impressions or to support one view over another;
References, or earlier work, are acknowledged where possible, and plagiarism is avoided.
I am surprised you actually used those because the information is everywhere. You just pretend to follow them so you can use the arguments. I'm not the only one who sees it either - you've been here a while. Sorry that you're so full of malice. Seriously it must be a bummer. Your obviously sick. I'm convinced at this point you are trolling as you have repeatedly failed to present any kind of support to your arguments. Almost as if you're depending solely on the amount of posts you've made. NAMASTE, is that any clearer of a representation of how I feel? :peace:
 

Attachments

Sativied

Well-Known Member
:clap: I have posted that same image more than a couple of times including at RIU. It's my signature on another mj forum :lol: you are so barking up the wrong tree poser ...

Again, you are "shifting the burden of proof" (google it genius). You haven't mentioned a single valid argument for your case, you haven't shown a single authoritative source that makes your case, on the contrary... Yet you dismiss my reasoning and arguments with childish remarks that have no logical foundation. Obviously merely to convince yourself that I am 'insane' and 'sick' for ridiculing your pathetic attempt to "win" and showing your simpleminded invalid logic. You've literally shown to be reluctant to actually find out the truth.

Tips:
If you want accuse someone of being a dick, don't be a dick yourself.
If you want accuse someone of not being intellectually honest, don't be such a fucking asshat yourself.

Since you're just going to resort to Ad hominem (don't understand that one either do you...) and project your own mental issues on me yet are not able to produce any valid arguments for your claims and start talking in circles like a retard (I already answered your request for citations that specifically state a pig can't fly several times, it has already been explained to you what really goes on) I will leave you with your delusions by posting another quote from my sig: ""Learn what makes a plant tick. There is no such thing as "advanced growing tips". - UncleBen" I will add to that, start with post #64... read about transpiration and nutrient uptake and you'll figure it out. Although... the force of ignorance is strong in you. Have fun pretending you're smart :wall:
 

AllenHaze

Well-Known Member
There is limited nutrient loss through transpiration - a closer definition would be that of "Guttation." I wonder why you have failed to present a single citation. Even after all the insults. Not one. Remember, I only have like 500 posts, I can always start over if I am discredited - I don't post nonsense though - read my sig. It's pretty evident that your concerned for your good name.
This guy's aggression has already put reasonable doubt into half the posts he's ever made. I am leaving this thread for the moment but I encourage any future viewers to take note of a few things; The lack of supporting information given by this individual, his repeated use of insults and personal attacks. His claims that I edited some horrible stuff out of my post (I called him ignorant) even though he failed to quote any of this. I encourage you to look for yourselves and if you find anything supporting either side of the argument post it or pm. I feel we could have worked together on this but you are quite insistent on being your own fool. Science is meant to advance by mean of erecting a hypothesis and then attempting to disprove it. In any lab in the world you would be booted for this nonsense. That is the bottom line. You can sit there, and pick apart my post for an hour, hunched over your keyboard and straining your back but I have to get going on out of here. Take care Sativied :cool:. Carpe diem. Pax nobiscum. :peace:
 

Attachments

AllenHaze

Well-Known Member
Something he said at the same time he was posting this thread. Poser to the max.

Sativied -
"They don't pull it out of a hat, they don't pull it out of their ass, they pull it out of an asshat.

I'm starting to see a trend, need to collect new memes.... the old ones for ridiculing arguments are non-applicable, need something like...

 

Sativied

Well-Known Member


Two weeks later and still butt hurt... I feel sorry for you man, must suck to be that insecure you need to throw all logic and reasoning overboard just to repair your ego. Well, you deserved it (:

You're the guy on the soapbox claiming something, all I said is that it was poorly worded and that makes your retarded brain conclude I need to spoon feed you... :lol: (see post #64 and get clue). You still don't get the burden of proof thingy do you dumbass :wall:

Poser to the max.
Coming from a loser who brags about an imaginary uncle that has an IQ of 165...
 
Last edited:

ficklejester

Well-Known Member
Yeah why can't folks attack each other in PM instead of jacking threads? That's a universal rule in forums, no? Mods would have to enforce it, though.
 

Yodaweed

Well-Known Member
Again. You sound insane. You take things so far out of context - something I already predicted. Alas, you posted too quickly yet again. If it has been this easy for me to find supporting evidence for my side of the argument why has it been so difficult for you? "Winning?" No, I said Jorge wins. I never said I won anything. RO water removes many of the ions from the water so why are you comparing RO water to rain water?Again, an issue with context. How many growers actually have ro water by comparison to tap water? :hug:
I use RO water and found a HUGE difference compaired to the tap and I have VERY good quality tap water. 41 cents a gallon at safeway across the street for RO water.
 

AllenHaze

Well-Known Member


Two weeks later and still butt hurt... I feel sorry for you man, must suck to be that insecure you need to throw all logic and reasoning overboard just to repair your ego. Well, you deserved it (:

You're the guy on the soapbox claiming something, all I said is that it was poorly worded and that makes your retarded brain conclude I need to spoon feed you... :lol: (see post #64 and get clue). You still don't get the burden of proof thingy do you dumbass :wall:

Coming from a loser who brags about an imaginary uncle that has an IQ of 165...
You can believe what you want. The fact that you insist that I am lying about my sister's profession and my families notorious higher then average IQ shows what you really have a problem with. I actually stumbled across the thread, not very hard to come across threads that have people you've met before on them and not the only one - you actually spew nonsensical bile pretty often. I'm not going to just sit by and let you talk down to person after person as if you're on a pedestal spreading what is likely a considerable percentage of BS. You should take care to edit your posts in favor of a decent, pleasant exchange in the future and be extra careful not to contradict yourself. :peace:
 

BDOGKush

Well-Known Member
lmao this butt hurt kid, last post on the 26th, comes back ten days later and posts a quote of Sativied from a completely seperate thread to try and talk shit
 
Last edited:
Top