Predictions

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
wouldn't they appeal that?
I'm not trying to be an ass but the other judges said they agreed there should be an injunction...it's too bad it didn't cover everyone though
 

oddish

Well-Known Member
In all reality they should, but this could go any of a myriad of different ways.
If the court case is settled before the injunction "expires" they have options.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
but the losing side WILL appeal....right up to the highest Court of Appeals and if they make a decision, i think that one is final and no more appealing
that's my guess as I'm not a lawyer
 

oddish

Well-Known Member
I wish i could keep the courts straight.. is this the federal court or is it already at Supreme?
Once you lose in supreme I don't think you get another appeal.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
right now the case is being heard later this month...when it's over, then the appeals start.
all that happened so far is there was an injunction that wasn't completely what we wanted/needed as it shut down gardens, put unreasonable carrying limits & we can't change production site addresses so there was that appeal but that's all for appeals. a new one has to be filed as the old one was tossed by the judges saying it was OK and why did the Manson not do anything for Beemish/Herbert...the judge said he didn't leave them out. their licenses were expired as of the date he chose Mar 31 2014 to interfere with the MMPR transition the least amount possible. so they have the answers they needed & said OK the current injunction stands...we need something for the "left outs" as I found out I am one as there is no one in the case with a current PPL but needs to change addresses. that was supposed to be covered in the Beemish situation but they have to decide on a date...then if they are in-they have to decide on their relief IE: need to move garden. if they stay at the Oct 31 date, no one with a valid PPL is represented.
 

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
So the Allard case is before Federal court. The outcome can be appealed to the SCoC. That would,then be the final decision on the MMAR/MMPR. The Edibles case is before the SCoC. That decision is final. It's good both issues are coming down the pipe at the same time....they kind of overlap and I have every faith in our SC justices being able to come to a competent decision in the publics best interests. Either way...it's coming to an end. But this time the whole worlds opinion is shifting on MJ....good times! We are not going to lose this war.
 

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
So the Allard case is before Federal court. The outcome can be appealed to the SCoC. That would,then be the final decision on the MMAR/MMPR. The Edibles case is before the SCoC. That decision is final. It's good both issues are coming down the pipe at the same time....they kind of overlap and I have every faith in our SC justices being able to come to a competent decision in the publics best interests. Either way...it's coming to an end. But this time the whole worlds opinion is shifting on MJ....good times! We are not going to lose this war.
here's to hoping!!
 

Craftybiatch

Well-Known Member
Its non-sence government political chess moves.

Who has the guts to call the RCMP and ask where they stand with the injunction? from what i heard, any pink sheet from any time gets them on there way.
I'm going to pop by the local detachment tomorrow and ask.
I'm curious because my son doesn't have a pink sheet. Or card. All we have is a bundle of paperwork and a signed document from his physician stating that 'medical cannabis relieves this patients symptoms. Based on this and my knowledge of this patient's condition, I believe this patient should have access to cannabis.'

Where does this leave us ?

I have a hard time believing that the SCOC would legalize physician assisted suicide (a very broad ruling too) but pull the plug (pun intended) on all forms of medical access and possession.
 

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
I
I'm going to pop by the local detachment tomorrow and ask.
I'm curious because my son doesn't have a pink sheet. Or card. All we have is a bundle of paperwork and a signed document from his physician stating that 'medical cannabis relieves this patients symptoms. Based on this and my knowledge of this patient's condition, I believe this patient should have access to cannabis.'

Where does this leave us ?

I have a hard time believing that the SCOC would legalize physician assisted suicide (a very broad ruling too) but pull the plug (pun intended) on all forms of medical access and possession.
If you get a chance ask about pre injunction expired patients, i know what ive heard but hearing it from another source will help others too.
 

Craftybiatch

Well-Known Member
I

If you get a chance ask about pre injunction expired patients, i know what ive heard but hearing it from another source will help others too.
I'm sure it depends on any number of factors. How busy that particular LEO happens to be wh
Just wondering...if we loose, will HC be allowed to send out our info to law enforcement? (like they said they would) if they do, will police enforce it?
I wonder what would happen if a dispensary got popped - could LE seize patient records and use that information for purposes unrelated to that particular investigation ?
 

Sandy420

Well-Known Member

Canadian Licensed producers of marijuana to benefit from cost accounting court battle
Posted on February 17, 2015 by Dr. Luc Duchesne
In a Vancouver courtroom on February 23, 2015 at 9:30 AM PST, the entire Canadian cannabiz industry and 40,000 licensed medical marijuana users, will hold their collective breath as four people have put and may still put an entire industry at a standstill by challenging the right of the Government of Canada to dictate how individuals can provide for their own medicine cost-effectively.

One of four Applicants in Neal Allard et al v. Her Majesty The Queen, Mr Neil Allard, a patient with legitimate needs for medical marijuana, estimates that to maintain his current dosage through a Licensed Producer at a cost of $8-10 per gram would cost approximately $6,000 per month, and $3,000 at a cost of $5 per gram. Until the implementation of the MMPR regulations in Canada, Mr Allard has a license to produce his own medical marijuana at a cost of $0.5 per gram under the MMAR regulations.

Forcing Mr Allard to buy medical marijuana, he argues in court documents, would compel him to pay costs that far exceed his monthly income either now or upon his retirement, and these costs are not eligible for assistance under any health care plan. Given these increased costs, Mr. Allard fears that he may have to risk imprisonment by continuing to produce marihuana or procuring it through the illicit market.

The Applicants’ case is at the center of a controversy that stalled the progress of marijuana industry since its filing in March 2014 a mere few weeks before the MMPR system was supposed to fully displace the leaky MMAR system. By leaky I mean that the lack of regulatory control of the MMAR system permitted medical marijuana to enter the illicit market.

- See more at: http://investorintel.com/potash-phosphate-intel/canadian-licensed-producers-marijuana-benefit-cost-accounting-court-battle/#sthash.V0tHe6ic.dpuf
 
Last edited:

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Seems to be a little slanted toward the LP's. Some comments are not accurate.
" the old MMAR system continues (albeit partially) to be in place until judgement is rendered from the current case, which may still be six months away and yet many more years." Seeing as how our current government has six months or less remaining in power and the incoming gov. has promised legalization, "many more years" is a stretch. " their affidavits do not provide sufficient evidence that the strains offered by the approved LPs thus far will be inappropriate for their medical needs." Bullshit, I know of several peoples research into strain availability from LP's and that information is with JC now.
This is no more than a fluff article to placate the investors. Strange how they fail to mention that a lose in the court will only benefit the BM and would not be the windfall LP are expecting.
 
Top