John Dee (Post #4) sez it doesn't look like nute burn. HG 888 (Post #17) sez it's "quite simply burnt".
I'm a newb, but would tend to agree with JD. AFAIK nute burn typically scorches the leaf membranes along the tip and edges, working its way inward. Nute deficiencies often express themselves across some or all of the leaf surface. Some nute def's damage the edges, which only makes diagnosis that much more fun.
I don't see much discussion of mobile vs. immobile in these threads. To me, that seems like a starting point for trouble-shooting. From this website:
http://nrcca.cals.cornell.edu/nutrient/CA1/CA010102.php
Mobile nutes: N, K, S, Cl, Ni
Somewhat mobile: P, Mg
Immobile: Ca, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B, Mo, Co.
The plant can move mobile elements from established leaves to new growth. Immobile elements stay where they landed. So mobile element deficiencies such as N will first appear in the older leaves as the plant tries to adapt to the deficiency. Immobile deficiencies, such as Ca, will display in newer growth. So with just that knowledge you can filter out roughly half the possibilities. Cl, Ni, B, Mo, and Co problems are somewhat rare so unless you're one lucky dude you're probably down to N, K, and/or S if the problem is appearing in the lower leaves. Or Ca, Fe, Mn, and/or Zn in the new growth. If not for those two pesky semi-mobile elements (P and Mg) this is almost too easy
It appears to this newb that blak's problems are showing up in the lowest leaves. If it's
not nute burn, seems to me the thing to do is take a hard look at N, K, & S first, and keep P & Mg in mind too.