"New Cyber Censor Keeping Close Eye On Everything You Say About President Obama"

Will you Join Dear Leaders Effort To snuff out heathens?

  • Nein (no)

    Votes: 13 76.5%
  • See Somethign Say something

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • I will join the red army

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Go get em BAMA! SILCE FOR ALL HEATHENS!

    Votes: 2 11.8%

  • Total voters
    17

dukeanthony

New Member
  • $11 billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments.
  • Illegal households only pay about one-third the amount of federal taxes that non-illegal households pay.
  • Illegal households create a net fiscal deficit at the federal level of more than $10 billion a year. If given amnesty, this number could grow to more than $29 billion.
  • $1.9 billion dollars a year is spent on food-assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
  • $1.6 billion is spent on the federal prison and court system for illegal aliens.
  • $2.5 billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.
  • About 21 percent of the population of U.S. prisons is classified as “noncitizens” from Mexico, Colombia, Cuba and the Dominican Republic. About 5 percent is listed as “unknown.”
Immigration costs like all “costs" come out of the "TAXPAYOR" hide. These costs represent additional money creation that dilutes all the savings and assets in America.
References:
“The High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the Federal Budget.” Steven A. Camarota. Center for Immigration Studies (CIS).
Quick Facts about the Bureau of Prisons. Federal Bureau of Prisons. Updated December 2008.
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has received a lot of press for a report it released today called Homewardbound: Recent Immigration Enforcement and the Decline in the Illegal Alien Population, so it's important to set the record straight on the report's "indications." Before pointing out the discrepancies in the report, it is essential to understand the background of who wrote it. CIS has been recognized as the "think tank" of the network of at least 13 anti-immigrant and white supremacist hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center. This group was begun by a man named John Tanton, under the guise of his interest in the environment and "population control." He has helped fund all these groups through one entity, U.S. Inc. U.S. Inc.'s lobbying arm is called "Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR)." The Executive Director of FAIR, Roy Beck, frequently acting as the "moderate" voice on cable news and radio talk shows, is actually editor of the Social Contract Press - a publishing house that promotes works such as "The Camp of the Saints," considered to encourage fear of anyone with colored skin. FAIR in turn created a "think tank" under its tax umbrella - CIS.
 

munch box

Well-Known Member
The Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) has received a lot of press for a report it released today called Homewardbound: Recent Immigration Enforcement and the Decline in the Illegal Alien Population, so it's important to set the record straight on the report's "indications." Before pointing out the discrepancies in the report, it is essential to understand the background of who wrote it. CIS has been recognized as the "think tank" of the network of at least 13 anti-immigrant and white supremacist hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center. This group was begun by a man named John Tanton, under the guise of his interest in the environment and "population control." He has helped fund all these groups through one entity, U.S. Inc. U.S. Inc.'s lobbying arm is called "Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR)." The Executive Director of FAIR, Roy Beck, frequently acting as the "moderate" voice on cable news and radio talk shows, is actually editor of the Social Contract Press - a publishing house that promotes works such as "The Camp of the Saints," considered to encourage fear of anyone with colored skin. FAIR in turn created a "think tank" under its tax umbrella - CIS.
The Southern Poverty Law Center that you love so much says we need to protect radical jihad extremists because (they say) Muslim hate is on the rise. Not to mention they have been spreading innacurate information for decades



For many years now, Focus on the Family (FOTF) has been one of the most respected and influential evangelical ministries in the country, and so it came as quite a shock when, earlier this month, FOTF’s traditional, pro-family views were deemed so extreme that TOMS Shoes founder Blake Mycoskie​, himself a member of an evangelical church, decided to break ties with them. He stated, “Had I known the full extent of Focus on the Family’s beliefs, I would not have accepted the invitation to speak at their event.”

Prior to his apology, Mycoskie had been blasted for his association with FOTF, and a blogger on the radically leftist Daily Kos website complained “that Mycoskie and his company TOMS supports one of the quintessential hate groups, Focus on the Family, which was named as a Hate Group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.” Focus on the Family a “quintessential hate group”?

If it’s any consolation, FOTF is not alone. When Texas Gov. Rick Perry announced a stadium prayer event to be held on Aug. 6, he came under heavy and immediate fire, not just over an alleged violation of the separation of church and state, but also because he was cooperating with the American Family Association (AFA), another so-called hate group. Yes, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has branded the organization founded by Don Wildmon, best known for his calls for boycotts over morally offensive programming and advertising, as a hate group. (To be technical, the SPLC labeled them an “anti-gay group” but featured them on the same list with the other “hate groups.” Since then, the liberal media, almost without exception, has labeled the AFA an SPLC-designated hate group. And because the SPLC in the past labeled FOTF an “anti-gay group,” they too are considered to be on the SPLC’s hate group list.)

What is the SPLC’s criteria for such extreme charges? It claims that the groups in question (which include the Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America) knowingly disseminate false information and demonizing propaganda about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, as documented by them (I use the word “documented” lightly) in their report “10 Anti-Gay Myths Debunked,” published late last year.

And while the report itself is nothing new, what is new is that its findings are now coming to national attention through these recent events. And many people, rather than questioning the SPLC, are instead questioning these venerable family organizations. Perhaps it is time to ask this question: Is it the SPLC that should be designated a hate group? Are they the ones spreading false information and demonizing propaganda about other groups, thereby defaming their good names and placing them in the ranks of the KKK and neo-Nazis?

It should first be recalled that the actual SPLC report was terribly flawed, as I and a number of others pointed out. For example, based on the report, if you state that kids do best when raised by a mom and dad (as opposed to two moms or two dads), you are propagating a known falsehood. Or if you agree with the many therapists and psychologists who argue that a child’s upbringing and early-life experiences (including being sexually abused) play a major role in the development of his or her sexual orientation, you are propagating a known falsehood. The same is true if you claim that hate crime laws could lead to the arresting of pastors who criticize homosexuality (this has already happened in Sweden, England and Canada), or if you argue that it would be detrimental to the military to have gays serving openly. Yes, according to the SPLC, disseminating such views officially constitutes “hate.”

All of which begs the question: Is the SPLC, by its own criteria, the real hate group? It still carries weight in plenty of circles here in America, and so when it categorizes an organization as a hate group, many people of good conscience are influenced by that designation, one which is quite stigmatizing and destructive, as evidenced by the recent events involving FOTF and AFA mentioned above. Yet it is the leaders of the SPLC who are either irresponsibly attacking other fine organizations, or worse still, knowingly defaming them.

Who then deserves the title of “hate group,” Focus on the Family or the Southern Poverty Law Center? Who has been guilty of demonizing others and spreading hurtful, inaccurate information? Whose actions and words have been hateful? The record speaks for itself.
 

munch box

Well-Known Member
All members of the American press and the pubic are being advised by ALIPAC (Americans for Legal Immigration PAC) that the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) has been documented distributing multiple lies via their website and releases to the media with 9 lies or errors in the latest release.

"The SPLC has thrown their credibility in the toilet to try and stifle debate on the illegal immigration issue," says William Gheen of ALIPAC. "They have exposed themselves as unreliable, are resorting to simple name calling, and attempting to convince the press they should ignore sources they compare to the KKK and Neo Nazis."

The SPLC recently allied with the National Council of La Raza and the Anti-Defamation League to try and scare broadcasters away from multi-ethnic groups, who are fighting against Amnesty for illegal aliens and for immigration law enforcement by claiming that such groups are using codes and a "playbook" written by groups associated with racism and murder.

"There are no codes. There's no playbook, and the SPLC cannot provide evidence that such things exist," says Gheen. "Americans and groups who are concerned about illegal immigration have nothing in common with groups who advocate violence against people because of race or religion."

The SPLC recently released "nativist" profiles of 20 people including William Gheen on their website. William Gheen is labeled as one of the 20 most influential people fighting against illegal immigration. His organization ALIPAC is described as "the influential political action committee Americans for Legal Immigration"

The attack piece on Mr. Gheen includes 9 provably false statements in their six paragraph presentation.
The SPLC description of William Gheen and ALIPAC attempts to persuade readers and the press that the group is motivated by racism and makes nine false statements about Mr. Gheen's employment records, the ALIPAC organization, legislation, and those who support the group.
 

munch box

Well-Known Member

Southern Poverty Law Center


A full report detailing the lies of the Southern Poverty Law Center can be found here.
SPLC Takes a Swipe at ALIPAC and Misses! 9 documented lies!
http://www.alipac.us/article-3024-thread-1-0.htmltml
William Gheen and ALIPAC are launching a national effort to warn members of the media and the public about the SPLC's attempt to use false information in an effort to defame groups and leaders fighting against amnesty and illegal immigration.
 

dukeanthony

New Member
William Gheen of Americans for Legal Immigration has a beef with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.). It's understandable. The Republican senator is actively working with the White House to come up with a rational and comprehensive immigration bill. And Gheen doesn't like it. So much so that at a rally on Saturday he made this bold pronouncement: "Sen. Graham, you need to come forward and tell people about your alternative lifestyle and your homosexuality. Come out of that closet, Lindsey. Come out of that log cabin closet...Look, I'm a tolerant person. I don't care about your private life, Lindsey. But as our U.S. senator I need to figure out why you're trying to sell out your own countrymen, and I need to make sure your being gay isn't it."
 

deprave

New Member
[video=youtube;pKG4hF2xj0Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKG4hF2xj0Q[/video]


"These physiognomies immediately refute the liberal theory" Adolph Hitler - who showed us in this film how to spot enemies of the state and report them to the proper authority back in his early days as the fuhrer - immediate refutation of the liberal theory is the first sign of an impure German.
[video=youtube;oVurfhMw1UU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVurfhMw1UU[/video]

Notice the similarities...its amazing.....its nearly the same picture that he paints of his enemies..
 

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
"These physiognomies immediately refute the liberal theory about the equality of all who bear a human countenance"

who needs to quote whole sentences when you make shit up with just half the words
 

dukeanthony

New Member
December 2, 1993 - Leading conservative operative William Kristol privately circulates a strategy document to Republicans in Congress. Kristol writes that congressional Republicans should work to "kill" -- not amend -- the Clinton plan because it presents a real danger to the Republican future: Its passage will give the Democrats a lock on the crucial middle-class vote and revive the reputation of the party. Nearly a full year before Republicans will unite behind the "Contract With America," Kristol has provided the rationale and the steel for them to achieve their aims of winning control of Congress and becoming America's majority party. Killing health care will serve both ends. The timing of the memo dovetails with a growing private consensus among Republicans that all-out opposition to the Clinton plan is in their best political interest. Until the memo surfaces, most opponents prefer behind-the-scenes warfare largely shielded from public view. The boldness of Kristol's strategy signals a new turn in the battle. Not only is it politically acceptable to criticize the Clinton plan on policy grounds, it is also politically advantageous. By the end of 1993, blocking reform poses little risk as the public becomes increasingly fearful of what it has heard about the Clinton plan.


Late January 1994 - A critically influential -- and intensely controversial -- pair of articles appears on the Wall Street Journal's conservative editorial page and in the liberal New Republic. Written by an obscure staffer of the conservative Manhattan Institute, the fear-mongering articles paint a devastating account of the impact of the Clinton plan. The White House, and other independent experts, say the articles are filled with patent falsehoods and distortions. Notwithstanding the criticism, the articles become highly influential, especially in conservative circles. Newt Gingrich will later characterize them as "the first decisive breakpoint" in support for the Clinton plan.

Does anyone remember what the Republican Proposal for Health care reform was at the time?

They Call it Obama care now
 

deprave

New Member
breaking news on the next page! HITLER DISOVERED ATTACKWATCH.COM AND HOLDS A MEETING WITH HIS WEB DESIGNERS - He finds out the website is the joke of the internet! He thinks it shoulda been made more scary!
 

deprave

New Member
THIS JUST IN - HITLER HAS DISCOVERED THE ATTACKWATCH.COM WEBSITE:

holds a secret meeting with his web design team.

[video=youtube;XZPwDRZ6pTM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZPwDRZ6pTM[/video]
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Liberal? Hitler and Obama are both Socialist......
tell me, which 3 of the pieces of legislation that obama signed during the 111th or 112th congress are "socialist".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/111th_United_States_Congress

by the way, hitler advocated NATIONAL soclialism (for your edification).

show me how obama is advocating national socialism. GO!

based on what i've heard YOU say, obama is advocating "anti-national socialism", the anti-national being based on your claims that he is "catering to the illegals".

that is where i call BS. obama has deported more illegals than his predecessors. this is among the reasons why i understand you can not see him as a centrist, because you are seemingly not swayed by actual facts and evidence.

if you want to compare hitler to obama, please do so in a fashion that is not so amateur and misleading. and please do answer the questions i have posed to you. i want to know his most socialist 3 pieces of legislation.
 

deprave

New Member
Gentlemen, the polling shows 3 defectors from humanity...Take them out behind the shed and have your way with them.
 

deprave

New Member
Attackwatch commercial: (parody)

[video=youtube;-XYKRokgX00]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XYKRokgX00[/video]
 

deprave

New Member
New Attack Watch Commercial:

[video=youtube;JkfCIDqQxdI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkfCIDqQxdI[/video]

you've just been thought policed
 

dukeanthony

New Member
So the right wing is spending big money to try and suppress the truth?
What a surprise that is
Must be afraid of it
 

dukeanthony

New Member
The Affordable Care Act promotes quality, affordable health coverage for all Americans, regardless of the industry they work in or their union status.
Attack

Attackers:Karl Rove, Sarah Palin, Crossroads GPS, othersAttack Type:Public remarks
Republican leaders have falsely claimed President Obama is using the Affordable Care Act to reward unions and punish enemies.
Tags:
Fact

Truth posted:September 1, 2011Evidence:Federal legislation, news articles
By 2014, the Affordable Care Act will prevent insurance companies from cutting off health care payments when people need them the most. In the meantime, the law allows President Obama’s administration to provide temporary waivers to employers who said the law’s interim standards would force them to drop their health plans or boost premiums.
President Obama’s administration has not shown a preference for labor unions when granting exceptions to the Affordable Care Act. Nearly every organization that applied for a waiver received one, and the exemption process did not discriminate between companies that supported the Affordable Care Act’s passage and those that did not.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i'm still waiting for munch box, with his AWESOME hillsdale college education, to justify his statement that obama is a socialist.

should be no problem for a person who was taught "how to think" :lol:
 

deprave

New Member
Obama is not a socialist, he is a centrist authoritarian lawyer that works for corporations. Big difference in sellout vs socialist...A socialist believes what they are doing is right..no way in hell obama believes what he is doing is right, I wouldn't trust him to watch my dog for a few hours...
 
Top