Myth busters - the real truth on CO2 in indoor grows

desertrat

Well-Known Member
There seems to be a lot of misinformation about how much co2 (carbon dioxide) is available to indoor plants, and how to think about whether and how much co2 to add if you decide to enhance co2. I took my calibrated co2 meter on a hunt for the truth.

As an aside for newbies, don't confuse carbon dioxide (CO2) that your plant uses with carbon monoxide (CO) which is a poisonous by-product of burning fossil fuels.

First myth - you should add CO2 indoors because there is less co2 in a closed indoor environment than what an outdoor plant gets. This is just not true. A normal indoor situation of an inhabited structure with central heating/cooling has as much as twice the amount of co2 indoors compared to outdoors. You do not have to add co2 to equal outdoor conditions. For example, in my case the outdoor co2 is at 400 ppm (national average is 390 ppm, thank you climate change) and indoors it's 650 ppm.

Second myth - adding co2 will improve your grow. This is only true under special conditions. The reason experienced growers add co2 is that if all other environmental conditions are optimized (water, nutes, light, temperature, humidity, medium, container, ph, insects, etc.) then and only then will increased levels of co2 (typical target is 1,500 parts per million) be used by cannabis plants to grow faster. Adding co2 without dialing in your grow will not change anything. if you are just starting out then don't worry about co2 for your first few grows.

Third myth - a couple of plants in a closed closet will exhaust available co2, requiring action on the grower's part to compensate by (a) actively ventilating to bring in fresh air or (b) by adding co2. In the vast majority of cases this is not true either. Home construction of internal walls is just not that airtight. An easy experiment to test your grow room - close off any inputs you've created and turn on the exhaust - the fan will run and air will continue to be forced out of the room indefinitely. If you have a tight room you can lower the air pressure (ie create negative pressure) but you won't be able to pull a vacuum because air will leak into the room from thousands of tiny cracks. The rule of thumb for an un-vented room is a complete air exchange every two hours. That new air will have more co2 than outdoors. In addition, the higher partial pressure of co2 outside your grow room will cause co2 to migrate into your room faster than other components of air. I have checked repeatedly and the co2 concentrations in my grow room are always within 100 ppm of the rest of the house, and considerably higher than outdoors, even without noticeable negative pressure and with a closet full of plants. Unless you're growing in a refrigerator or tent or similar (or you are growing dozens of plants) you don't have to do anything to get enough co2 for your plants.

Fourth myth - carbon filters emit co2. no, they don't. Carbon filters remove smelly compounds from the air, they have nothing to do with carbon dioxide. Thanks to mydixiecrat for helping to point this out.

Fifth myth - you need expensive co2 generating and monitoring equipment to maintain the proper levels of co2 if you choose to enhance. Okay, I bought into this myth and I believed it enough to get a $400 co2 monitor and a $450 gas generator. So, I thought I'd get a little extra back from my investment. I have the gas generator running in my flowering room but nothing for my veg room. I'm going to use my monitor from the flowering room to test whether it's really possible to build a ghetto sugar/yeast co2 system that produces a steady and predictable concentration of co2. I'll keep updating this thread with results - maybe the next person can save the $850 plus propane costs with a couple of kitchen supplies. Results so far show that a sugar/yeast system is quite good at providing a relatively steady, predictable and meaningful amount of carbon dioxide.

:-?
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
Experiment 1 for generating co2 from yeast/sugar: used homebrewer's ratio of sugar to water and XxNinjaxX's amount of yeast (see Sticky: HomeMade CO2 Guide), at least for this first attempt.

Room details - 384 cubic feet, closed really tight (takes effort to open the door due to negative pressure when exhausting, which i've stopped for this experiment), a/c, 600 watt mh light, 170 cfm fan pulling carbon filter and recirculating air, 15 two to three week old seedlings.

household co2 equal to 650 ppm.

Formula: 2.25 gallons of water/3.1 pounds sugar/46 grams of yeast in 4 separate containers. i cheated and ran one liter bottle, saw how much my co2 jumped, and scaled it up to target 1,500 ppm co2.

Ended up with 1525 ppm at 11 pm on 6/27/10 after running two hours.

co2 at 1625 at 3 pm on 6/28.

co2 at 1575 at 5 pm on 6/28/10.
 

JustinWafroGuy

Active Member
Subscribed - I wanna see how this turns out. Don't fancy spending ridiculous amounts of money on CO2 equipment if i don't need to.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
ok got my attention too, someone with a meter who'll run tests-

my room is about 450 ft3, and i've been running a small catalytic lp heater, running for 2 hours takes it to 2800 ppm (bought a syringe test, 2 tests for 20 bucks), in 3 hours it had gone to around 200 ppm.

our rooms are very similar except i run 2800 watts

so i'm interested to know where you've ended up on recipe, and how long this volume of solution will continue to sustain appropriate levels of co2?
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
for now and future reference - if i don't post a :-? as a sign off then i'm :blsmoke: and you should take that post for what's it's worth - still being social but don't take what i say to the bank. i'll revisit later and edit a sig if the post is ok.


note: this --> :-? <--- is where you'd want to see a :-?. since you do, you know i came back and edited the post when my eyeballs rotated back in front
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
so i'm interested to know where you've ended up on recipe, and how long this volume of solution will continue to sustain appropriate levels of co2?
note my previous post but current estimate is 2.5 to 5 days depending on how much air is exchanging to/from the room, how much co2 the plants consume, and whether the appropriate ratios of ingredients exist to promote continued fermentation.
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
dude i think you inhaled too much co2, that last post makes no sense!
it means i'm fully medicated. this keeps me honest. if i'm unmedicated i'll remember to sign off with the :-?. (edit: fuck. see what i mean.) if i'm medicated, no sign off.
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
i wanna watch.
welcome aboard. i'll give at least one update per day.

This could save me some money. Thanx desertrat
you're welcome. suppose i could charge an inventor's fee? just sayin

very interesting..i will read up on that
it all started with Sticky: HomeMade CO2 Guide.

Subscribed - I wanna see how this turns out. Don't fancy spending ridiculous amounts of money on CO2 equipment if i don't need to.
if five bucks for 10 lbs of sugar can last you 4 weeks then this is a great deal for co2. we'll have to see if it works out that way. read some people who think this never makes sense. we'll see.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
sorry if i've offended-

i've read the co2 sticky, but it little in the way of definitive production ratios, i too am interested in sitting in at the tests
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
sorry if i've offended-

i've read the co2 sticky, but it little in the way of definitive production ratios, i too am interested in sitting in at the tests
no offense taken. of course you're welcome, answered your question in earlier post than others.

also, 1400 ppm co2 at 11 pm

:-?
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
results so far: fermentation is slowing, probably too much alcohol is being produced? will keep experiment number 1 going until co2 ppm is below 1000.

date..........time..............ppm co2
27-Jun...... 11:00 PM.......1525
28-Jun........3:00 PM.......1625
28-Jun........5:00 PM.......1575
28-Jun........8:00 PM.......1425
28-Jun......11:00 PM.......1400
29-Jun......11:00 AM.......1225

:-?
 

desertrat

Well-Known Member
i'm want to buy a fuzzy logic co2 controller to compliment my bottle and regulator. for now i have it on a timer using this calculator. http://www.hydroponics.net/learn/co2_calculator.asp you might save me a few bucks desertrat.
back with all my senses intact. you need to at least know the rate of co2 addition - does your regulator show a flow amount (as in cubic feet per time period)? if so, then no reason why this experiment won't help you. without a flow rate can't see how to help.

:-?
 
Top