Marijuana is not an all-purpose medical cure

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
My concern is that as marijuana becomes more readily available, Canadians might opt to self-medicate
By Scott McLeod, for CBC News Posted: Oct 14, 2017 5:00 AM ET Last Updated: Oct 14, 2017 5:00 AM ET
Many Canadians can hardly wait for the day that the recreational use of marijuana becomes legal. As a medical doctor, I'm far less enthusiastic. I worry about two things: the experimental nature of marijuana in medical practice, and the public health consequences of legalized marijuana.

Before you write me off as overly prudish or an anti-marijuana conservative, let me say out of the gate that I'm not opposed to legalized marijuana in principle – I'm just paying attention to the evidence, or r

I wish I could be more positive when they ask. I find the possibility of a new medicine to benefit conditions that don't respond well to current medications exciting. Unfortunately, the research is not there yet.

So, what do we know so far?

Here's the good news. In May of this year, a double-blind placebo controlled trial showed that cannabidiol — one of the active ingredients within the marijuana plant — reduced the number of seizures in children with Dravet syndrome, a condition that results in severe seizures, developmental delays and problems with movement and balance.

The drug may even be approved for use in difficult-to-treat epilepsy cases by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration, based on the latest research.

There's some other promising news: medical marijuana has also shown a moderate degree of benefit for patients with neuropathic pain and stiffness and involuntary muscle spasms related to multiple sclerosis.

Other uses, such as the treatment of nausea and vomiting following chemotherapy for those with cancer; assistance with improving weight gain in HIV patients; improvement in sleep disorders and the reduction of the symptoms of Tourette syndrome all have less evidence of benefit, but may be promising for some in the future.
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member


The National
Ontario announces legal pot sales plans





00:00 02:11


Ontario announces legal pot sales plans2:11

But that's where the research ends. Some of the popularized ways in which medical marijuana is currently being used, such as for post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety, lack long-term evaluation. While medical marijuana may have short-term benefits, long-term use may result in increased aggressive behaviours or even worsening of symptoms.

Today's medical marijuana is also not what it once was. Generally, we've seen a consistent increase in the THC content of marijuana — the main psychoactive component — from the 1960s to the present day. In fact, THC is being sold by licensed producers at concentrations of greater than 15 per cent in a substantial proportion of available strains.

Still experimental
Why is this a problem? The cannabis used in medical research contains less than 10 per cent THC. We do know that using cannabis with higher THC concentrations is associated with an increased risk of psychosis, but we really don't know much about the medical effects at these higher concentrations.

While I remain hopeful that medical marijuana may bring medical breakthroughs in the future, more needs to be done to inform the public that medical marijuana remains in experimental stages — and currently, for the majority of conditions or ailments, it has minimal to no evidence of benefit and may even be harmful.

Legalization will remove some red tape to allow for more research, but many patients might opt to self-medicate without ongoing monitoring of their symptoms, or else, may choose to delay seeking help from a medical professional. These are just some of the public health consequences that could come from the legalization of something that many see as an all-purpose medical cure. It's in everyone's best interests to try to set the record straight.

This column is part of CBC's Opinion section. For more information about this section, please read this editor's blog and our FAQ.
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
Translation: My concern is patients will realize they don't need as many doctor visits or pharma pills as they have been led to believe, thus threatening the extravagant lifestyle I have become accustomed to.
I find it funny that my doctor can't count. ,, my appointment at the pain clinic is on tuesday...but my meds run out 3 days early.... today....
When you consider they make pain patients sign a contract... to take their meds as prescribed...period....for chronic non cancer pain...
it seems rather suspicious that they continue to short me meds each month...and the qty's dispensed are correct...for a 2 week period but months don't have 28 days in them...do they.??..(except feb of course)
I figure my pain doctor has been trying to push my buttons by asking me, last time...what narcotic's would I like to try???
and then shorting me on the meds she is supposed to be titrating me off off.....with no pre discussed extra taper instructions or anything....
just underhanded/under estimated qty's for another month.
She expects me to freak out I guess....and call to complain or something...but I have refused to..
since I believe ...they try and label you (drug seeker/addict) if they can....
Which I also .,,,believe their end game is.... so you won't be able to come back in pain and ask for narcotic's in the future..
because of a note or a blemish on your file...
I asked her to wean me off of everything....Yes my idea... but I did not ask for her to make me suffer while doing it...
I asked her to remove 10mg a month until finished...she agreed it was a good plan...
5 times in the last 5 months I have had to go 2 or 3 days with no meds...even though at my next appointment she writes me to continue...
its actually very tough on me....since I have been on pain meds for more than a decade..

even though I know their end game is ...just to improve the statistics... so they can say ..."see we no longer over prescribe opiates..."
thing is... they have improved the numbers on the well being.... of a lot of pain patients
in order to try and curb an epidemic of heroin users using illictly made fentanyl cut heroin

the two things are not even closely related....
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
Prob is is that the doc are getting nervous that us patients are enpowered now to control and manage our own issues Instead of being a Guinea pig for "it might work treatment" as myself have experienced, wish more doctors were more supportive of a medicine that has virtually no side effect and can provide a deterrent to cancer and increase quality of life to the patient. So sad, as for legislation is a joke, I agree there should be regulations but really a provincial monopoly isn't going to work, we're being condensed to like children and ppl are to stupid to realize that this was the plan from jump street as a part of Trudeaus platform, we need small growers with passion and knowledge and people who care not corps and lobbyist, it's going to be a mess.. My opinion
welcome to the board hazemedi1
 

Farmer.J

Well-Known Member
Where is the years and years of opiod research for each opiod drug? Heroin from the 1960's probably wasn't as potent as fentanyl. Enough said.

Cannabis has been used 20,000 years or so, no deaths from consumption. Fentanyl has been around maybe a decade and has a long list of ODC's.
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
We have been having issues with basically a board troll...who does nothing but try and be disruptive...
Mods have asked that we try and not respond to the troll/trolls..
Gb123 is a long time member here....who has recently become the trolls latest target...
Gb123 is a very upstanding member of the community here....this troll trys to impersonate..by making multiple accounts and using names close to the other members...
Please do you best to refrain conversations with.... while the mods deal with this person...
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
Hmm the new member seems to have gone with the clone...or at least hazmedi1 has deleted his or her posts...
Makes you wonder but still I would rather be nice and welcome a new member ...than auto assume they might be a poo flinger....
 

sunni

Administrator
Staff member
Hmm the new member seems to have gone with the clone...or at least hazmedi1 has deleted his or her posts...
Makes you wonder but still I would rather be nice and welcome a new member ...than auto assume they might be a poo flinger....
They deleted their own posts
 
Top