Man-made global warming is a lie and not backed up by science, claims leading meteorologist.

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Sounds to me like you're the butthurt one, being what, a 55 year old who hasn't tasted pussy in decades?

I dig the projection though :D

I'm in my prime while you're sitting there with your hands on your wrinkled twig n berries, I bet that sucks..


somebody should have had The Talk with you before now, but here's some recommended reading, specially selected for your comprehension level

 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Your inability to comprehend information is your problem, and seems to be a pretty big one at that. Everything I posted refutes your bullshit and proves you don't know shit about Keynesian economics. That's why you can't refute any of it.

Stay tuned for the dismantling and destruction of supply side economics


so delusional.

you gonna copy/paste something from Das Kapital?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
are you 12?

for fuck's sake!

also, any tales of my sexual escapades would be of little interest to you, since i dont get off on rape.

go steal you momma's copy of 50 shades of grey.
LOL that's hilarious coming from you. I post comprehensive dissections of your bullshit all the time and all you do is cry about how much there is to read and post memes that you think make you look smart.

Then you call me a virgin and ask if I'm the 12 year old...

You are literally retarded.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
LOL that's hilarious coming from you. I post comprehensive dissections of your bullshit all the time and all you do is cry about how much there is to read and post memes that you think make you look smart.

Then you call me a virgin and ask if I'm the 12 year old...

You are literally retarded.
you copy/pasted snippets from a wikipage which not only failed to refute my arguments, they reinforced my assertions, theres nothing "comprehensive" about that, in fact you showed a distinct lack of comprehension of the material.

if you actually understod the material, you would have tried to refute even one of my bullet points, but you failed to do so, and quite spectacularly i must say.

then you challenged me to a E-Penis measuring contest, and dared me to detail my sexual history, i assume so that you could add a few anecdotes to your spank bank.

you may not actually be 12 years old, but you act like you are.

so rather than attempting to convince me to share my sexual escapades, why dont you grab that dog-eard copy of the sears catalog you keep under your mattress, and crank one out without involving me in your deviant sexual fantasies.

frankly it's a little creepy that you would try to coerce a few stories from me, when you could just go to http://Literotica.com, and peruse their wide selection of materials
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
you copy/pasted snippets from a wikipage which not only failed to refute my arguments, they reinforced my assertions, theres nothing "comprehensive" about that, in fact you showed a distinct lack of comprehension of the material.

if you actually understod the material, you would have tried to refute even one of my bullet points, but you failed to do so, and quite spectacularly i must say.
1. "Thus, according to Keynesian theory, some individually rational microeconomic-level actions such as not investing savings in the goods and services produced by the economy, if taken collectively by a large proportion of individuals and firms, can lead to outcomes wherein the economy operates below its potential output and growth rate."

2. Keynesian theory says nothing about "spend those taxed monies on pretty much anything, no matter how pointless", it allows for people to make those decisions. People are not perfect, but your statement assumes all people working in government are corrupt, which you probably actually believe but fortunately isn't the case in reality. Which is ironic considering we know what corporations do without regulation, buy politicians and federal elections thereby effectively lowering all their own taxes, and increasing economic inequality. That's what happens every time, and that's what you support.

3. "Keynes's theory overturned the mainstream thought of the time and brought about a greater awareness of structural inadequacies: problems such as unemployment, for example, are not viewed as a result of moral deficiencies like laziness, but rather result from imbalances in demand and whether the economy was expanding or contracting. Keynes argued that because there was no guarantee that the goods that individuals produce would be met with demand, unemployment was a natural consequence especially in the instance of an economy undergoing contraction.

He saw the economy as unable to maintain itself at full employment and believed that it was necessary for the government to step in and put under-utilised savings to work through government spending. "

4. "Thus, according to Keynesian theory, some individually rational microeconomic-level actions such as not investing savings in the goods and services produced by the economy, if taken collectively by a large proportion of individuals and firms, can lead to outcomes wherein the economy operates below its potential output and growth rate."
Looks like someone didn't even read the fucking material. What an idiot.


then you challenged me to a E-Penis measuring contest, and dared me to detail my sexual history, i assume so that you could add a few anecdotes to your spank bank.

you may not actually be 12 years old, but you act like you are.

so rather than attempting to convince me to share my sexual escapades, why dont you grab that dog-eard copy of the sears catalog you keep under your mattress, and crank one out without involving me in your deviant sexual fantasies.

frankly it's a little creepy that you would try to coerce a few stories from me, when you could just go to http://Literotica.com, and peruse their wide selection of materials
YOU called me a virgin, retard, YOU'RE the one who brought sexual escapades into it, retard.

Anyone can go back and see the shit. If you can't stand the heat, stay the fuck out of the kitchen, idiot.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member

Looks like someone didn't even read the fucking material. What an idiot.




YOU called me a virgin, retard, YOU'RE the one who brought sexual escapades into it, retard.

Anyone can go back and see the shit. If you can't stand the heat, stay the fuck out of the kitchen, idiot.

It's Friday night and you are sitting at home whining on an internet forum. Yep, you're a virgin.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
It's Friday night and you are sitting at home whining on an internet forum. Yep, you're a virgin.
I live a lifestyle that permits me to feel the same on a Monday night as a Friday night, this isn't gradeschool anymore, sweetheart..

Change your habits and come join the party :)
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
I live a lifestyle that permits me to feel the same on a Monday night as a Friday night, this isn't gradeschool anymore, sweetheart..

Change your habits and come join the party :)
You're here all night, every night. Pretty obvious you aren't getting any.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member

Looks like someone didn't even read the fucking material. What an idiot.




YOU called me a virgin, retard, YOU'RE the one who brought sexual escapades into it, retard.

Anyone can go back and see the shit. If you can't stand the heat, stay the fuck out of the kitchen, idiot.
you didnt refute my assertion, you shouted Nuh UHh!! when the fact is, even keynes himslef argued that what govt spends on is irrelevant, it's the spending that is key.


"If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. It would, indeed, be more sensible to build houses and the like; but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing."

Book 3, Chapter 10, Section 6 pg.129 "The General Theory.."
~Keynes himself
https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/keynes/general-theory/ch10.htm

this is the source of the old saw that the govt could hire people to dig holes, and then pay them more to fill em back in, and thus stimulate the economy.

you didnt refute shit, since the fact that keynesians dont give a squirt of piss what govt spends on, as long as it spends, is irrefutable.

that was the only point you even attempted to argue, but you offered no source or citation to support your petulant Nuh Uhh!!

i was hoping you might actually try to defend you assertions, so i could put you through a humiliating spanking machine of comments from keynes kruggo and frenchy, but you chickened out.

and yes, i called you a virgin, cuz you act like a 12 year old who has just discovered masturbation.

yep. anyone can go back and see it, much to your embarrassment a few years from now when you finally take a course in economics and realize that you believe some straight up bullshit.

but i wont bring it up on that distant day, cuz im too classy, and even the stupidest dolt deserves a chance to live down his youthful idiocy.

you may not have noticed but YOU are the one who keeps harking back to past threads where you got served but dont even realize it.

i prefer to live in the now, but anytime you crank up the Wayback Machine, ill be happy to dredge up those old daguerreotypes of you getting ritually sodomized in thread after thread.

for teh lulz.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It's really not a fair fight. Kynes is eloquent, interesting and has style in his writing. The dolts that try to tussle with him are boorish, lack much of a vocabulary and appear to be mildly retarded.

The fact that Kynes destroys them on substance, while they think they're belittling him due to the quantity of "likes" they give themselves, is precious.

I actually feel embarrassed for them every once in awhile. It's kinda sad and pathetic.
kynes can't even do exponents, doesn't know what eggs cost in his own town, thinks termite farts are fueling the rise in global temps, and says phillipe rushton is a respected academic.

of course you like him.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
you didnt refute my assertion, you shouted Nuh UHh!! when the fact is, even keynes himslef argued that what govt spends on is irrelevant, it's the spending that is key.


"If the Treasury were to fill old bottles with banknotes, bury them at suitable depths in disused coalmines which are then filled up to the surface with town rubbish, and leave it to private enterprise on well-tried principles of laissez-faire to dig the notes up again (the right to do so being obtained, of course, by tendering for leases of the note-bearing territory), there need be no more unemployment and, with the help of the repercussions, the real income of the community, and its capital wealth also, would probably become a good deal greater than it actually is. It would, indeed, be more sensible to build houses and the like; but if there are political and practical difficulties in the way of this, the above would be better than nothing."

Book 3, Chapter 10, Section 6 pg.129 "The General Theory.."
~Keynes himself
https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/keynes/general-theory/ch10.htm

this is the source of the old saw that the govt could hire people to dig holes, and then pay them more to fill em back in, and thus stimulate the economy.

you didnt refute shit, since the fact that keynesians dont give a squirt of piss what govt spends on, as long as it spends, is irrefutable.

that was the only point you even attempted to argue, but you offered no source or citation to support your petulant Nuh Uhh!!

i was hoping you might actually try to defend you assertions, so i could put you through a humiliating spanking machine of comments from keynes kruggo and frenchy, but you chickened out.

and yes, i called you a virgin, cuz you act like a 12 year old who has just discovered masturbation.

yep. anyone can go back and see it, much to your embarrassment a few years from now when you finally take a course in economics and realize that you believe some straight up bullshit.

but i wont bring it up on that distant day, cuz im too classy, and even the stupidest dolt deserves a chance to live down his youthful idiocy.

you may not have noticed but YOU are the one who keeps harking back to past threads where you got served but dont even realize it.

i prefer to live in the now, but anytime you crank up the Wayback Machine, ill be happy to dredge up those old daguerreotypes of you getting ritually sodomized in thread after thread.

for teh lulz.
lol, full on kynes meltdown.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
yep. responding to posts made over the course of a day, as opposed to posting them all in the time when i stepped out to have a cigarette.

:lol:

looks like i've been on your mind, eh?

loser.

Looks like another Uncle Buck meltdown.

Only losers smoke cigarettes.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
lol, you waited all day to make that comment. it's been stuck in your fat craw for a day.

thanks for that free space in your head.

Not really. I have a real life I tend to. This is purely "For Entertainment Purposes Only". Instead of watching the Kardashians I come here to fuck with you. You are my TV.

Go smoke another cigarette, loser.
 
Top