john parker

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
he was armed in that gun free zone of the umpqua community college when the shooting happened.

how is it he was unable to save those students with his good guy gun?

he was a veteran for fuck sake too.
Look at the silence here. Any of the consveratards want to answer this?
 

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
You know that could be easily flipped on you? A guy was there with a gun, who DIDN"T kill a bunch of people. Proof that guns don't kill people?

To answer your questions, its a complex situation, its hard to say how one would react in that situation.

Also ,

 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
There was a guy in Idaho with a gun and he also didn't stop the UCC shooter. Proof, PROOF I say, that guns are of no use for self defense, whatever. The only reasonable thing to do is to disarm law abiding citizens.

Can you imagine the blood bath that Parker would have caused if he had been in the vicinity of the crazy UCC shooter, and had actually unsheathed his weapon. He would have fired in every directions, like one of those spinning firecrackers. Hundreds would have been killed. Oregon's population would have been decimated.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
You know that could be easily flipped on you? A guy was there with a gun, who DIDN"T kill a bunch of people. Proof that guns don't kill people?

To answer your questions, its a complex situation, its hard to say how one would react in that situation.

Also ,

How dare you inject reason into this exercise in hand wringing.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
"Parker says he didn’t intervene because he knew police SWAT team members wouldn’t know him from the shooter."

Wow its almost as if he is in touch with his survival instinct. Survival of the fittest. So the strong survived, and the weak died. He didnt seek out the guy, but if the guy found him, he would have been far more prepared than you, or your feminized men friends.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
Parker noted that he was hustled into a classroom with other students by a professor who asked if anyone was armed. He said he raised his hand and said he would attempt to protect his fellow students if they came under attack.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
he was armed in that gun free zone of the umpqua community college when the shooting happened.

how is it he was unable to save those students with his good guy gun?

he was a veteran for fuck sake too.
would you reveal your true agenda here? why do you present one sided arguments like the mass media? what do you stand to gain?
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
His point, stupid, is that 'good' people carrying guns apparently don't make anyone else safer.
And my point, smarty, is that he was in a room where he was able to protect a large group of people, thus making them safter. You can't take care of others unless you take care of yourself first. His goal was to survive the crazy, guy, and the crazy government that would show up shortly....i say shortly but probably takes 10 minutes, which is a lot of time. Maybe if it wasn't a gun free zone, more people would bring their gun to school, and youd have a larger pool of "heros" to protect you before the "heros" show up in 8-13 minutes.

His point was easily dismantled by providing the whole picture of the mindset of Mr. Parker. How did you miss that? Did you not read what I wrote and apply critical thinking? Me guesses, yes.
 

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
So I don't understand, was this Parker guy with a gun in the classroom with the shooter? Or he just happen to be also at the same school (not with the shooter?). In that case it makes perfect sense to defend his position.
 

ASCIIGHOST

Well-Known Member
he was armed in that gun free zone of the umpqua community college when the shooting happened.

how is it he was unable to save those students with his good guy gun?

he was a veteran for fuck sake too.
why wont you state your intended agena? if its gun control, say its gun control. dont be scared of facts. you what to emphazize his veteran status too. since you cant spit on veterans in real life (youd get your ass handed to you likely) is this your outlet for it? please do not hide your agenda. i mean for fuck sakes, homosexuals live openly, and its accepted. its 2015, out with it dude.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
There was a guy in Idaho with a gun and he also didn't stop the UCC shooter. Proof, PROOF I say, that guns are of no use for self defense, whatever. The only reasonable thing to do is to disarm law abiding citizens.
no need for the hyperbole just because your "gun free zone" myth and "good guy with a gun" myths have been totally debunked.

but would ya mind telling me why you joined a white supremacy group?
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
no need for the hyperbole just because your "gun free zone" myth and "good guy with a gun" myths have been totally debunked.

but would ya mind telling me why you joined a white supremacy group?
92% of mass murder shootings since 2009 have been in gun free zones
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
why wont you state your intended agena? if its gun control, say its gun control. dont be scared of facts. you what to emphazize his veteran status too. since you cant spit on veterans in real life (youd get your ass handed to you likely) is this your outlet for it? please do not hide your agenda. i mean for fuck sakes, homosexuals live openly, and its accepted. its 2015, out with it dude.
i like the homophobia wrapped up into your paranoid gun-nuttery. it's cute.

my agenda remains to report facts, even if they contradict the agenda and rhetoric and propaganda that homophobic, racist gun nuts like you put out there.
 
Top