ISIS UNCOVERS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAQ

President Obama is currently meeting privately with his cabinet to discuss the news from Iraq that ISIS has discovered scores of Weapons of Mass Destruction that Saddam Hussein had hidden before the start of the US Invasion in 2003. The UN security council is scheduled to meet for an emergency session.
Buried in various spider holes and underground bunkers, the WMD stores were found in areas east, west, south and north around Tikrit and Baghdad. The existence of the WMD stores, unknown since 2003, have now become known. Now, known unknowns include ISIS’ specific plans for the WMDs and the expediency with which they will rain death on what they consider western infidel regimes.

You got a link?

I'm reading the chemical weapons facility that ISIS has captured has no military grade chemical material. It's degraded stores of sodium cyanide and sarin which ISIS cannot safely use or move. They just don't have the knowledge/expertise or facilities to create a working device or launch the delivery system.

Hopefully the US is rolling white phosphorus onto bombers to counter any attempt at retrieving the canisters from their concrete bunkers.

Quote from ISIS leaders to the USA
"we will drown all of you in blood."

http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/18/isis-threatens-america-again-we-will-drown-all-of-you-in-blood/

Now , we are beginning to see the US reaction to Syria, which as an offshoot is the emergence of ISIS, or what ever they call themselves. The US will devastate them from the air, as those fanatics will have drones and jets around them, just as a flower has bubble bees. But, we as a result will be supporting Assad, and in a convoluted manner, Hezbollah. Makes you want to scratch you head, doesn't it.

Hell, we gotta go send f-18s out at a cost of $30,000 an hour to drop $100,000 worth of bombs on our $12 million tanks that these guys stole from the Iraqis.

Defense corporations got it made, nothing but demand for their $12 million bomb catchers.

earnest_voice said:

You got a link?

I'm reading the chemical weapons facility that ISIS has captured has no military grade chemical material. It's degraded stores of sodium cyanide and sarin which ISIS cannot safely use or move. They just don't have the knowledge/expertise or facilities to create a working device or launch the delivery system.

Hopefully the US is rolling white phosphorus onto bombers to counter any attempt at retrieving the canisters from their concrete bunkers.

Click to expand...

I can't find where I got the opening info, but it appears to be alarmist and wrong in the spider-hole and hidden bunker claim, however in looking for it I found this article which I thought rather interesting.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/arnold-ahlert/saddams-wmds-the-lefts-iraq-lies-exposed/

Choo said:

I can't find where I got the opening info, but it appears to be alarmist and wrong in the spider-hole and hidden bunker claim, however in looking for it I found this article which I thought rather interesting.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/arnold-ahlert/saddams-wmds-the-lefts-iraq-lies-exposed/

Click to expand...

So you've started off a thread with inaccurate information and now want to cite neo-con rag as a source?

David Horowitz and co. make my bullshit meter start beeping...

earnest_voice said:

So you've started off a thread with inaccurate information and now want to cite neo-con rag as a source?

David Horowitz and co. make my bullshit meter start beeping...

Click to expand...

No, I didn't cite it as a source at all, I said it was interesting, I said it was interesting. I just put up the link. Whether the original information was inaccurate was not the point of the discussion.,I copied and pasted it but failed to cite the source. I made no conclusion. I wanted to read opinions on it but as is so common in the politics forums it seems to always turn into personal attacks.

Choo said:

No, I didn't cite it as a source at all, I said it was interesting, I said it was interesting. I just put up the link. Whether the original information was inaccurate was not the point of the discussion.,I copied and pasted it but failed to cite the source. I made no conclusion. I wanted to read opinions on it but as is so common in the politics forums it seems to always turn into personal attacks.

Click to expand...

He never attacked you though. If you thought what was some sort of personal attack, you should run screaming from this section and never return.

travisw said:

He never attacked you though. If you thought what was some sort of personal attack, you should run screaming from this section and never return.

Click to expand...

the asshole, sheep raping, podunk, pederast, communist, murderer, retard, puppy-hating, leftist, zionist, neocon, dirtchute, shill for the Koch Brothers, travisw is correct.

that doesnt rise to the level of a personal attack.

heckler73 said:

This just in:
ISISILIPUTTI have found Saddam's Tikrit chemical weapons stores.
They were cleverly disguised by what appeared to be an outhouse, yet beneath it was found a pit filled with biological substances believed to be precursors for weapons manufacture.

"We will burn America. Our biological weapons will destroy the infidels. Our slingshots will hurl poo all over the desert until grass grows, insha Allah." Salami al-Wasabi, chief propagandist for the organization, was quoted as saying.

"Uhhh...This is a serious....uhhhh.... problem!" Obama told reporters at the White House earlier today. "Uhhhh....drones, hope and ...uhhh....change! Democracy, freedom, God bless America. Don't vote Republican," he concluded.

Click to expand...

sadly, it has long been established that the leftist meme "No WMD's in Iraq" is bullshit.

hans blix clearly stated in his report "we didnt find shit, but we werent allowed to look where we think the shit was hidden"

wikileaks is replete with reports of chemical weapons caches, including piles of artillery shells loaded with sarin, mustard and VX (all degraded and useless) rockets with chemical warheads (un-charged but ready for filling) and chemical sprayers with residue of sarin and mustard still on them (from his attacks on his own dissidents) and ALL of that shit was supposed to have been turned over, or destroyed (with proof submitted) under the cease fire agreement from Gulf 1.

the lefties KNOW saddam was hiding all this shit, but they blame booosh anyhow.

cuz it's a shame to let a crisis go to waste.

I bet this is leftovers from what they looted (and used) in Syria and wasn't found in Iraq at all.

It covers two things:
A: US doesn't have to admit it wasn't Assad who gassed those people

B: US gets to claim weapons found in Iraq justify the Iraq war.

Harrekin said:

I bet this is leftovers from what they looted (and used) in Syria and wasn't found in Iraq at all.

It covers two things:
A: US doesn't have to admit it wasn't Assad who gassed those people

B: US gets to claim weapons found in Iraq justify the Iraq war.

Click to expand...

yeah.. they got it in syria, and trucked it into iraq so nobody would know, cuz ISIS is really a CIA front group...

is there any mad story that you will disbelieve?

if i said that i have proof that the US was secretly behind the Australian pederasty crisis, and our embassy in Perth was shipping US sex offenders Down Under and giving them fake Aussie passports and free tickets to Thailand you would probably be repeating that shit all overt the interwebs in minutes.

Dr Kynes said:

yeah.. they got it in syria, and trucked it into iraq so nobody would know, cuz ISIS is really a CIA front group...

is there any mad story that you will disbelieve?

if i said that i have proof that the US was secretly behind the Australian pederasty crisis, and our embassy in Perth was shipping US sex offenders Down Under and giving them fake Aussie passports and free tickets to Thailand you would probably be repeating that shit all overt the interwebs in minutes.

Click to expand...

Pics or it didn't happen.

Harrekin said:

Pics or it didn't happen.

Click to expand...

Dr Kynes said:

View attachment 3232986

Click to expand...

Where's the art studio?

Choo said:

No, I didn't cite it as a source at all, I said it was interesting, I said it was interesting. I just put up the link. Whether the original information was inaccurate was not the point of the discussion.,I copied and pasted it but failed to cite the source. I made no conclusion. I wanted to read opinions on it but as is so common in the politics forums it seems to always turn into personal attacks.

Click to expand...

No personal attacks not sure how you consider a relevant criticism of the source material to be a personal attack, unless you penned the source itself...

The death toll will be lopsided in our favor.

Plus isis is a girls name.
its like marching around with shoot me signs taped to their backs.