Twitch
Well-Known Member
or make the price go up.
ICE WAX (bubble hash) with Matt Rize
- Thread starter Matt Rize
- Start date
or make the price go up.
Twitch
Well-Known Member
OR too
Twitch
Well-Known Member
I like asking people what they do, because a lot of people who do this as a hobby get in here and state their opinion, which is fine it is a public forum, but I ask to see the validity to the opinion stated. So for someone like you @hyroot, with your cute grow, you are an amateur, a consumer, this is your hobby for fun, actually I retract the "for fun" you do it for the smoke so you don't have to pay stupid prices for bad quality. I have never bashed any solvent-less hash, but you sure bash on us.... and I just troll you because I like pushing your buttons....
They each have their place, BHO is just scores higher in potency, flavor, yield and market appeal.
I am not entirely sure how I ended up in this thread I usually try to stay out of Rize's thread.
They each have their place, BHO is just scores higher in potency, flavor, yield and market appeal.
I am not entirely sure how I ended up in this thread I usually try to stay out of Rize's thread.
hyroot
Well-Known Member
Nice copy and paste from norml. I bet you didn't actually readt the health and safety codes. You will be surprised
a couple of those dsisensaries you listed shut down 2 and 3 years ago.
yes i get tests. zero pesticides in my grow. I go to my moms house and use her high end Ro system with uv light and fill up 5 gal jugs.
Last edited:
hyroot
Well-Known Member
My cute grow lol. thats my personal grow. I ve told you several times already what i do in this industry... ice wax goes fgor double the price of bho.. rosin has a higher terpene profile than bho. so does ice wax. blasting butane scrambles the heads and terps. winterizing and qwiso both remove terps. ice wax and rosin have the same thc % sometimes higher thc than bho. we have had this argument several times and i prove it everytime and I wont do this again/
i consult. I have several grows going. I work with extract companies making their solventless. a lighting company in the works., should be released next year after all the testing. Opening a single source dispensary in dec. Clothing company, seed company. With myu cute grow it would be impossibvle to run the 30+ strains I have. Plus the testing I do for 4 other seed companies and 3 lighting companies . Don't hate because of your ingnorance and short memory.. Every time you try and put me down you just put your foot in your mouth and look like a fool. Everytime
i will not say where my money goes because thats just plain stupid to announce publically
Last edited:
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
If they were shut down 2-3 years ago, why are they still paying for a weedmaps account and updating their menus every day? Why do they have products like Moxie live resin which did not exist even one year ago?
I'd like to see proof of that seeing as how you have demonstrated an ability to make things up because you think they sound good. Show me a clean lab test.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Are you saying your cold water hash doesn't contain any dihydrogen monoxide?
hyroot
Well-Known Member
yep. No ones does except for 3rd world countries with polluted drinking water. Its a hydric acid that scrambles DNA worse than uvb does. If my water had dhmo I'd be dead or at the very least have cancer. Do background research on the sites you get this shit from. Its b.s. And your scare tactics are laughable ..
copy and paste some more random bullshit.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
I've noticed a pattern here. Everything you are saying is simply not true. None of it. You just completely make up everything you post.
I've done over 500 terpene tests on extracts and see hundreds more. Everything you are saying is a lie.
Considering everything else you have said to this point has been false, I simply don't believe you. You are just running your mouth. You have no credibility.
If you were really that involved in the industry you would have a better understanding of the things you were talking about. If you were anywhere in the process of opening a dispensary your lawyers would have already told you that most of what you are saying here isn't true.
You don't have a grow running 30 plus strains. You do not have a lighting company in the works. You aren't opening a dispensary. You do not have a clothing or a seed company. You do not do testing for any seed or lighting company in any official capacity. Starting a company is incredibly hard work. It takes up all of your time. Anyone who's actually done it knows what I'm talking about. You certainly aren't starting up 4-5 companies right now. You likely just sit on your couch and get high and have pipe dreams.
I know a fraud when I see one. You are definitely a fraud. Quit lying.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
There you go. I just proved you are full of shit. Dihydrogen (H2) Monoxide (O) is actually H2O, or water as it is more commonly called. You have now been caught pretending to know what you're talking about when you actually do not.
So how about you give up the bullshit?
Quit fronting
hyroot
Well-Known Member
I dont believe shit you say. I could punch holes in everything you say. You have thread about getting ripped off from vending yet you own a dispensary yeah right....
you must be looking in the mirror. Dis you get caught bs - Ing again and need to lash out. Or do you need a hug everything I've posted is factual and have been proved time and time again..
.god day. I'm down responding to your trolling
.oh and the o in h20 is oxygen no monoxide. So your full of shit again
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Mon/o means 1. Oxide means oxygen. Monoxide = one atom of oxygen. Di = two. Hydrogen is self explanatory. Dihydrogen means two atoms of hydrogen. Dihydrogen Monoxide = h2o.
If you can't even figure out what monoxide means you have no business trying to act like you know any of the things you are pretending you know.
You've been exposed as a fraud. Quit fronting.
Yodaweed
Well-Known Member
Dihydrogen monoxide hoax
The dihydrogen monoxide hoax involves calling water by the unfamiliar chemical name "dihydrogen monoxide" (DHMO), and listing some of water's effects in an alarming manner, such as the fact that it accelerates corrosion and can cause severe burns. The hoax often calls for dihydrogen monoxide to be regulated, labeled as hazardous, or banned.
Ice Water Hash is not harmful I don't know where you get your information.
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
You are correct. Well done
I was just trying to prove hyroot is full of shit. He fell for it.
hyroot
Well-Known Member
A monoxide is any oxide containing just one atom of oxygen in the molecule. For example, Potassium oxide (K2O), has only one atom of oxygen, and is thus a monoxide. Water (H2O) is also a monoxide; see dihydrogen monoxide hoax. A well known monoxide is carbon monoxide (CO); see carbon monoxide poisoning. Most of the members of the Periodic Table form oxides when oxidized. There are two main types of oxides: monoxides and dioxides. Monoxides (generally MO) such as silicon monoxide (SiO) only exist at high temperatures. Among monoxides, CO is neutral, GeO is distinctly acidic, and SnO and PbO are amphoteric.
hyroot
Well-Known Member
You are correct. Well done
I was just trying to prove hyroot is full of shit. He fell for it.
see you were just proven wrong by some one else... how funny . theres no dhmo in water but there is monoxide hmmm
Dan Kone
Well-Known Member
Congrats, you've discovered google. If you would have used it before running your mouth about how there is no dihydrogen monoxide in your water you'd still have credibility left.
hyroot
Well-Known Member
theres no dhmo in water. that was part of the hoax.. monoxide - oxygen molecule is. you combine the other chemicals and becomes a hydric acid
\
looks like you were wrong and full of shit the whole time. Thanks for making me look good
how.did you prove I'm full of shit. When all you did is troll using false information. The whole time I said there's no dhmo and I was right . Everything I said is factual and legit. All you did was prove how fraudulent you are. Your credit score just dropped dramatically. You lost all credibility. But mine just went up thanks to you.
its obvious your the faker. And have to prove you are better than you truly are. I feel sorry for people like you that have to lie to look good.
Last edited:
hyroot
Well-Known Member
The dihydrogen monoxide hoax involves calling water by the unfamiliar chemical name "dihydrogen monoxide" (DHMO), and listing some of water's effects in an alarming manner, such as the fact that it accelerates corrosion and can cause severe burns. The hoax often calls for dihydrogen monoxide to be regulated, labeled as hazardous, or banned. It illustrates how the lack of scientific literacy and an exaggerated analysis can lead to misplaced fears.[1]
The hoax gained renewed popularity in the late 1990s when a 14-year-old student collected anti-DHMO petitions for a science project about gullibility.[2] The story has since been used in science education to encourage critical thinking.
Contents
A 1983 April Fools' Day edition of the Durand Express, a weekly newspaper in Durand, Michigan, reported that "dihydrogen oxide" had been found in the city's water pipes, and warned that it was fatal if inhaled, and could produce blistering vapors.[3] The first appearance of the hoax on the internet was attributed by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette to the so-called "Coalition to Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide,"[4][5] a parody organization started by UC Santa Cruz student Craig Jackson following the on-campus postings and initial newsgroup discussions.
This new version of the hoax was created by Eric Lechner, Lars Norpchen, and Matthew Kaufman—housemates while attending the University of California, Santa Cruz in 1989,[6] revised by Jackson in 1994,[4] and brought to widespread public attention in 1997 when Nathan Zohner, a 14-year-old student, gathered petitions to ban "DHMO" as the basis of his science project, titled "How Gullible Are We?".[2]
Jackson's original site included the following warning:[7]
Dihydrogen monoxide:[8]
The hoax gained renewed popularity in the late 1990s when a 14-year-old student collected anti-DHMO petitions for a science project about gullibility.[2] The story has since been used in science education to encourage critical thinking.
Contents
- 1 History
- 2 Molecular terminology and naming conventions
- 3 Public efforts involving the DHMO hoax
- 4 DHMO in education and debate
- 5 See also
- 6 References
- 7 External links
A 1983 April Fools' Day edition of the Durand Express, a weekly newspaper in Durand, Michigan, reported that "dihydrogen oxide" had been found in the city's water pipes, and warned that it was fatal if inhaled, and could produce blistering vapors.[3] The first appearance of the hoax on the internet was attributed by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette to the so-called "Coalition to Ban Dihydrogen Monoxide,"[4][5] a parody organization started by UC Santa Cruz student Craig Jackson following the on-campus postings and initial newsgroup discussions.
This new version of the hoax was created by Eric Lechner, Lars Norpchen, and Matthew Kaufman—housemates while attending the University of California, Santa Cruz in 1989,[6] revised by Jackson in 1994,[4] and brought to widespread public attention in 1997 when Nathan Zohner, a 14-year-old student, gathered petitions to ban "DHMO" as the basis of his science project, titled "How Gullible Are We?".[2]
Jackson's original site included the following warning:[7]
Dihydrogen monoxide:[8]
- is also known as hydroxyl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.
- contributes to the "greenhouse effect".
- may cause severe burns.
- contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
- accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
- may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
- has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.
- as an industrial solvent and coolant.
- in nuclear power plants.
- in the production of styrofoam.
- as a fire retardant.
- in many forms of cruel animal research.
- in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
- as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.