I thought you guys were "winning"...?

Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
althor said:
Anyone who uses close and personal death as a way to jab at someone is as classless and useless as they come.
You are a disgrace to all you claim to represent.
Click to expand...
Does the same go for politicians who use James Foley's death as a reason to bring America back into Middle Eastern affairs?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Since your science has been proven wrong, who gives a shit what a bunch of PR groups say.
Click to expand...
IPCC is the leading expert panel on climate change. None of the science has been proven wrong, if it had been, you'd of cited it, LOL!

You're simply butthurt about the fact that the entire rest of the world not subject to American propaganda on a 24/7 basis is already on board. I love feeling it! It's delicious! I could marinate my steak in your butthurt!
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
IPCC is the leading expert panel on climate change. None of the science has been proven wrong, if it had been, you'd of cited it, LOL!

You're simply butthurt about the fact that the entire rest of the world not subject to American propaganda on a 24/7 basis is already on board. I love feeling it! It's delicious! I could marinate my steak in your butthurt!
Click to expand...
It's been cited many times, to no avail. Religious zealots don't let facts influence them. The rest of the world doesn't seem to include China or India, the most populous nations, or Russia, the largest. So, once again, your "facts" don't jive with reality.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The alternate reality they shelter themselves in is simultaneously pathetic and amusing.

Red knows better than 34 national academies of science and anyone who believes those academies is not living in reality

Fucking grand

Red1966 said:
It's been cited many times, to no avail. Religious zealots don't let facts influence them. The rest of the world doesn't seem to include China or India, the most populous nations, or Russia, the largest. So, once again, your "facts" don't jive with reality.
Click to expand...
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
It's been cited many times, to no avail. Religious zealots don't let facts influence them.
Click to expand...
I agree

The religious zealots (you) aren't actually concerned with the facts, you're only concerned with what you perceive might push your agenda forward. (Keep the gas/oil running). That's what your talking heads tell you to be concerned with..
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I agree

The religious zealots (you) aren't actually concerned with the facts, you're only concerned with what you perceive might push your agenda forward. (Keep the gas/oil running). That's what your talking heads tell you to be concerned with..
Click to expand...
I suppose you don't use electricity, cars, buses, farmed foods, any form of plastic, goods shipped to your local store that you walk to, heat, A/C, just about EVERYTHING you use? Yes, we should all go back to living like cave men.
 
A

althor

Well-Known Member
I am of the opinion... Yes, it sucks we are so oil dependant. The very moment we have a realistic alternative, I am all for it.
Until then, that should be our number one focus. Stop wasting time with all the half-assed energy alternatives.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
I suppose you don't use electricity, cars, buses, farmed foods, any form of plastic, goods shipped to your local store that you walk to, heat, A/C, just about EVERYTHING you use? Yes, we should all go back to living like cave men.
Click to expand...
well, that is one option
 
earnest_voice

earnest_voice

Well-Known Member
Not a single damn person said:
not a single damn person likes you.

tell us all about how you were in on the plot to get bin laden, armchair patton.

that is, if you're not too busy with holocaust denial and joining white supremacy groups.

you guya must have changed the name to tacoburrito to hide from buck because you were just doing it to get a rise out of buck hence why you tried to hide it from buck.

you dumb shits wouldn't know reality if it sucked your flaccid two inch peckers for free.

die in a fire, red1966 will be happy to oblige you.
Click to expand...
I though you'd spent the last couple of days sick, i was hoping your flu led to pneumonia and you were knockin' on deaths door, but I hear you were busted and sent to the drunk tank so by the sounds of it someone was knockin' on your back door - did you let 'em in?:hump:

You're such a pathetic narcissist even your sock puppet refers to the friendless drunkard Uncle Zim Zam or are you referring to a male rat with the use of "buck"?

Don't bother answering, everyone here knows they're one in the same

abandonconflict said:
that sure is a fine citation for his "well thought out rebuttal" of so many arguments with cited peer reviewed studies
Click to expand...
Why so defensive? the citation from the graphic is the IPCC and Washington Times. Are you inferring one or both are not 100% truthful?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Echelon1k1 is all upset...again.

Or just continuously upset.

Maybe some Holocaust denial and white supremacy will cheer that sorry sack of shit up.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
althor said:
I am of the opinion... Yes, it sucks we are so oil dependant. The very moment we have a realistic alternative, I am all for it.
Until then, that should be our number one focus. Stop wasting time with all the half-assed energy alternatives.
Click to expand...
The reason the energy alternatives are "half assed" is because of the conservative right. They feel such measures undermine their efforts, as their politicians tell them.

Had it not been for the conservative right, such measures wouldn't be "half assed".

Blame them.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
earnest_voice said:
Why so defensive? the citation from the graphic is the IPCC and Washington Times. Are you inferring one or both are not 100% truthful?
Click to expand...
I see a chart from google images with no explication as to which miscalculations in particular the image refers to. I see tht it claims to cite IPCC but all that means is that it is some deniers representation of IPCC data. I see you're presenting it as if it were a silver bullet after completely dismissing so many concise arguments with cited peer reviewed studies with no explanation as to why you found them invalid. Most of all, I see a chart that shows clearly that temperatures are still within predicted ranges. Lastly, I see a note which stipulates that everything to the left of the line which looks like 2006 is retrospective models of predictions.

No, why are you so defensive?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
The reason the energy alternatives are "half assed" is because of the conservative right. They feel such measures undermine their efforts, as their politicians tell them.

Had it not been for the conservative right, such measures wouldn't be "half assed".

Blame them.
Click to expand...
BS. You think throwing money at science can solve this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top