Growman09,
Look at it this way, if it were legal (as it once was) and thus inexpensive, there wouldn't be any conflict caused by the drug. Everyone is allowed to make their own choices, and personally I feel that the right to do drugs was covered by the declaration of independence when Thomas Jefferson wrote that we all have the right to pursue life, liberty and happiness. Who is to say how we should go about pursuing that happiness so long as it doesn't hurt anyone else? Drugs exist in our society, and it makes no sense to descriminate against someone based on their drug of choice. In reality, cocaine in its powder form is far less harmful than alcohol, and it only poses the greatest risk of habituation in the form of crack. If it were not for prohibition, crack would have never been introduced as it would not have been necessary. Crack was developed for pragmatic reasons alone because it takes less raw cocaine to make crack than powder cocaine, and thus less needs to be smuggled into the country.
As for growing cocoa to make coke, I think its crazy, but hell in our current political environment, so is growing weed. The OP knows that and is obviously willing to assume that risk. I see nothing wrong with producing mind altering substances for personal consumption, isn't that what we are all here for anyways?
