SA' were not what they had in mind is a fact? LOL...in a fit of inextinguishable laughter.get real, for christ's sake..are you that in love with semi-automatics?
it is middle ground. actually, it's complete ground.
what was it our forefathers said? something about the 'right to bear arms'?
gonna say SA's were not what they had in mind. fact.
learn to compromise, ya big bully!
you can't posit a hypothetical (they would want) as a fact. only a very stupid person would try to do that.And you're right about our forefathers. They would want us all to be carrying fully automatic weapons equal to what the military carries. fact.
didn't you predict a 14 point romney win with the utmost of confidence?You know you're right like crazy people know they're sane.
no, they thought that a militia was necessary to the security of a free state.what they had in mind was that people be armed with the same arms that the regular army had.
no, they thought that a militia was necessary to the security of a free state.
since we have standing armies now, is there really any reason for citizens to have firearms at all?
The liberal mentality on display. Any time they want to advance their agenda, they call for compromise and expect it in their favor.but that wouldn't be a compromise..would it?
no, that is not a compromise, because 90% or more are opposed to that.A "compromise" using your definition would be for YOU to give ground towards my wishes. Less background checks, fully auto weapons for all.
if we did that, then the civilian army would have to equal or surpass the WWII army.Woops, so wrong.
“… but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow-citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist.” – Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 29, Concerning the Militia.
That's awesome and relevant if those were the only reasons to own firearms.you don't need an SA for target practice or deer hunting.
my dad used bow and arrow.
Deer hunting with a bow when a firearm is available is seriously cruel.you don't need an SA for target practice or deer hunting.
my dad used bow and arrow.
dude, this was the 60's..who the fuck knows why..but deer season was needed at some point in the north..deer jump out and get hit by cars all the time left to die a slow painful death..Deer hunting with a bow when a firearm is available is seriously cruel.
Why do you want deer to die in pain?
citation..i dunno..why don't you google it?Does Bernie Sanders even know what Semi autos are? He's telling gun owners that he wants to ban almost every firearm they own.
So you don't know what Semi autos are either.citation..i dunno..why don't you google it?
soooooooo, you need a SA to go deer hunting?, smaller game?..larger game?
pointing to his support for banning semi-automatic weapons
how about..legal to make (from a kit) and use (hunting), but illegal to sell?
Regardless all the other feel goods he may or may not have to offer, this is a deal breaker.
Fuck his couch.