Georges theory on how to move solar systems!

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
I have read youre 'book' and its shit , my young child could do better and im not joking .
You need to drop the jesus nonsense .
You have to get yourself a new girl .
I'm sorry that I disappointed you, in regards to My online book. I can't make everyone happy.

I have dropped the "Jesus nonsense" a long time ago. I'm not Jesus but I am Christ. Or at least I truly believe that I'm Christ. I can't help it. I have My "evidence" that convicts Me to say the things I do.

AND I love you too, The Sativa High.

~PEACE~
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
G'dammit...

I was expecting at LEAST a quasi-realistic astrophysics discussion based on like....a Hawking documentary, or Sagan or some shit...


Won't make that mistake again.

Feel free to post ANY videos that will prove or disprove My theory on how to move solar systems. This theory of Mine is totally whimsical and I just conjured it up because I think too much about crazy shit. But feel free to post ANY videos about moving solar systems or stars or planets.

Feel free to post anything you want in this thread as long as its relatively on topic. Make the thread great with your posts.

~PEACE~
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
I don't wish you were never born, I just hope people in the future consider birth control after reading your posts.

My degree has one of the highest employment rates of all degrees. It teaches critical thinking skills which translate to all aspects of life.


Just sayin'.
I'm very proud of you Beef and your degree in philosophy because I don't have a degree in anything besides being BAD ASS. Seriously, I know your a smart guy and your adept in critical thinking, I was hoping you could use your critical thinking capabilities and figure out if My theory is right or wrong. Its a fact that light pushes, even if ever so slightly. But what if you use a lot of light, like from a solar laser, and aim it at a star?

Do you think My theory is possible at all or no?

~PEACE~
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
I also have a theory about planet building. I simply would use (the future) SPACE JETS to round up as many asteroids and comets as possible and make artificial planets out of them.

There would be 3 major types of planets.

1) Planets with regular gravity, where people live mostly on the surface.

2) Planets with artificial gravity, where the planet is spun around to create artificial gravity via centrifugal force.

3) Planets with little to no gravity, where you just live on the inside of the planet and float around for the most part.

I would keep all the nuclear power plants on the outside of all of these types of planets.

The planets with regular gravity will be the biggest because it takes a lot of mass to create enough gravity to live on, whereas the other planets can be smaller and you can induce artificial gravity via a spin. You would live on the inside of these smaller planets and there would be many layers to it, the more levels the better. One could have oceans or seas on the inside of these smaller planets too. The type of planet with the artificial gravity, you would stand up towards the center of the planet because the gravity would be on the inside, pushing out.

I also have a theory about getting rid of planets orbits. I would spin the planets, just like earth, around the sun but take away the orbit. There would have to be "magic planet movers" to create the seasons to tilt the planets the right way and to keep the planets from falling into the sun. These "magic planet movers" might be nuclear powered rockets, but I would use antimatter rockets if we can ever create enough antimatter.

You could live on any of these planets like you would earth except it might be a little cooler in some respects.

All of these things are possible, but it would take a one world online government to bring the world together.

If I were the King of the world, I would start working on these things immediately.

EDIT- If planets were just spun in place then it would allow HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of more planets to be placed around the sun. You could just put them right in the "goldy locks" zone and just spin the planets in place and use the "magic planet movers" (or nuclear or antimatter power) to keep the seasons. You could ultimately place these new planets ALL AROUND the sun, in any location, whether it be on "top" or "bottom" or any "side" of the sun. I'm sure you could fit hundreds of planets but maybe thousands of planets could all be balanced around our sun. This would allow for "planet hopping", where you visit any planet for however long you would like. I would use SPACE JETS to travel the planets because the SPACE JETS could fly through space, air and water.

I also would imagine that these SOLAR LASERS could also augment time travel. Ride the light, so to speak. You might be able to travel 99.999999 percent the speed of light with all that power behind your solar sail. So, in theory, you could travel to any time in the future and be almost as young as you left that planet.

What will I think of next?

~PEACE~
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
My question is still left unanswered.
Zaehet, I don't even know what it means to be saved. What makes a person saved and someone not saved? I have no idea. Religions say to follow their religion and you will be saved BUT I don't know what that even means. Do you?

You can read My last post because I thought that was good enough. Maybe you should read the New Testament and see what Jesus said about being "saved". I honestly don't know how to be saved or to save anyone. Its a very vague word. One can be saved from many things but how is anyone saved spiritually?

If you want a hubris answer from Me, I would say "believe in Me if you truly want to be saved". But what does it mean to be saved? Do you just live differently? Does being saved mean your going to heaven? We are all going to heaven if God is real and loving.

What do you want Me to say?

~PEACE~
 

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
Do you think My theory is possible at all or no?

~PEACE~
I have no idea, I am not a physicist. But I'll take a stab at it anyway.

Stars are fucking huge, and I don't think a 'space laser' would have enough force to move a star. One that did would require such a tremendous amount of energy it would be virtually impossible. There are constantly nuclear explosions the size of the earth (or bigger) happening on/in/around the sun, tremendous amounts of energy being expelled in all directions. Do you honestly think a fucking laser would move a star?

If we had the technology to make such a laser, it seems likely we would also have the technology required to avoid whatever disaster we were facing that would force us to 'move a solar system'.... lol

Why are you so obsessed about this? It's really dumb.
 

grimreefer24601

Well-Known Member
Centrifugal force would throw you off a planet unless you were living inside an artificial shell.

On Earth, if Centrifugal force meant anything it would throw you, and all liquid water into space.

You say you understand physics, but you fail on basic premises.

Gravity is caused by mass. Even hypothetically, a centrifuge large enough to simulate gravity may or may not work. We've never tried it anywhere but on Earth. On Earth all centrifuges pull you both to gravity and centrifugal forces. We've no knowledge of how a pure centrifuge would affect beings. Centrifugal force may not equal massive gravity. We really don't understand massive gravity enough. Nor really centrifugal affects.
 

tyler.durden

Well-Known Member
Tyler, I love you too (as a friend).

Seriously, I love you... And I love all the other RIU members that I talk to too, including Beef.

I don't mind getting criticized by you because I know your skeptical about most thing I say. Its ok. I still love you as a friend.

~PEACE~
Everything you write shows that you don't have an understanding of the subjects you claim interest you. You lose more and more credibility with every thread you start, so the way you are doing it now is driving away potential followers. You have become a living joke, which I'm starting to believe is your goal. The way to gain a following is to first gain credibility, and if you are using science as your platform, (stick with me here, george, I know its tricky) you need to have gained scientific knowledge. You are asking people that are much more intelligent and knowledgeable than you to trust and believe in you, while at the same time you post meaningless, impossible ideas that seem akin to what a 3rd grader would come up with. You don't know the science, so your ideas are no good. You have to learn before you can teach, George, so get some grade school textbooks and start learning. How are you doing on your meds lately? You seem more manic than usual...
 

high|hgih

Well-Known Member
Wait wait..
Who is the OP? He thought he was Jesus? Sorry, I haven't been on the internet much lately, I'm a little out of the loop.

Now all biases aside, I enjoy your way of thinking(Though, that makes no sense). However, I would recommend reading a little more about both basic and advanced physical sciences.

Edit: Like I can say that as a superior, some RIUees have taught and caused me to read a lot through contradictions of my own ate up ideas.
I still don't know very much :/ I lead a strange life, it's not very often I find myself reading anymore.

But in the woods it's fun :) with wine and cigarettes
AND ROBITUSSIN AND BABIES ON MY DICK LIKE SHISH CABOBS
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
I have no idea, I am not a physicist. But I'll take a stab at it anyway.

Stars are fucking huge, and I don't think a 'space laser' would have enough force to move a star. One that did would require such a tremendous amount of energy it would be virtually impossible. There are constantly nuclear explosions the size of the earth (or bigger) happening on/in/around the sun, tremendous amounts of energy being expelled in all directions. Do you honestly think a fucking laser would move a star?

If we had the technology to make such a laser, it seems likely we would also have the technology required to avoid whatever disaster we were facing that would force us to 'move a solar system'.... lol

Why are you so obsessed about this? It's really dumb.
You are right, stars are VERY big and it would take a ridiculous amount of energy to move them. This is just purely a THEORY that I have no idea if its doable.

But I imagine that if you aim the wrath, or business end, of these theoretical "solar lasers" at a star, it might do SOMETHING. It might take many stars to move one star, but the question is if its possible or not.

Centrifugal force would throw you off a planet unless you were living inside an artificial shell.

On Earth, if Centrifugal force meant anything it would throw you, and all liquid water into space.

You say you understand physics, but you fail on basic premises.

Gravity is caused by mass. Even hypothetically, a centrifuge large enough to simulate gravity may or may not work. We've never tried it anywhere but on Earth. On Earth all centrifuges pull you both to gravity and centrifugal forces. We've no knowledge of how a pure centrifuge would affect beings. Centrifugal force may not equal massive gravity. We really don't understand massive gravity enough. Nor really centrifugal affects.
Yes, if I were to create a planet with artificial gravity using centrifugal force then innately you would have to live on the inside of that planet. You would stand facing the center of the planet, opposite to earths gravity.

I think you could simulate gravity on a small planetary scale if you simply spun the planet in place, why not? You would have to live underground but that might not be so bad.

Wait wait..
Who is the OP? He thought he was Jesus? Sorry, I haven't been on the internet much lately, I'm a little out of the loop.

Now all biases aside, I enjoy your way of thinking(Though, that makes no sense). However, I would recommend reading a little more about both basic and advanced physical sciences.

Edit: Like I can say that as a superior, some RIUees have taught and caused me to read a lot through contradictions of my own ate up ideas.
I still don't know very much :/ I lead a strange life, it's not very often I find myself reading anymore.

But in the woods it's fun :) with wine and cigarettes
AND ROBITUSSIN AND BABIES ON MY DICK LIKE SHISH CABOBS
Yes, I believe that I'm the Second Coming of Christ. I have been positing it since last winter under the name of "Nevaeh420". And I had a different name on RIU called "We Love 1" that I've been saying I'm Christ here too since 2008. And before 2008 I had a couple other names on here but I didn't believe I was Christ back then.

So since 2008, I have been claiming to be the Second Coming of Christ and I have been positing it mostly on our website, rollitup.

You can read My signature to see some of the things that I believe in.

Its not like it matters much though, because no one on here cares about what I have to say anyways. I type the things I do for My own benefit because no one else cares. At least My words are documented somewhere, and I hope one day people will read what I have written.

~PEACE~
 

Beefbisquit

Well-Known Member
You are right, stars are VERY big and it would take a ridiculous amount of energy to move them. This is just purely a THEORY that I have no idea if its doable.

But I imagine that if you aim the wrath, or business end, of these theoretical "solar lasers" at a star, it might do SOMETHING. It might take many stars to move one star, but the question is if its possible or not.
You're discussing scientific concepts. A scientific theory is supported by evidence.

"A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experimentation."

What you are proposing is not a theory, as it is not supported by any evidence.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
You know what, George? You have no idea how laser is generated, do you?

Put mirrors around a candle. Is that a laser? Do you think it is about the light intensity? No. That is only the result.

And you have no idea how 3 body orbital mechanics work, do you? So you can't just scrape gravity sources together without de-stablizling the Star System.

So, there is no science here, and so not even science fiction. And it is no theory and just really only a novice and modest, brain fart.
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
You know what, George? You have no idea how laser is generated, do you?

Put mirrors around a candle. Is that a laser? Do you think it is about the light intensity? No. That is only the result.

And you have no idea how 3 body orbital mechanics work, do you? So you can't just scrape gravity sources together without de-stablizling the Star System.

So, there is no science here, and so not even science fiction. And it is no theory and just really only a novice and modest, brain fart.
You seem more versed in science then Me. And you're probably right.

Can you extrapolate on the things you mentioned. I don't know how "3 body orbital mechanics work", I don't know how lasers ACTUALLY work. And why can't you " just scrape gravity sources together without de-stablizling the Star System"?

You seem more astute in science then this layman aka Me.

I just came up with a crazy notion that I don't know would work or not and I figured I would posit it for the scientists on rollitup.

Maybe the "solar lasers" can't work right now, but could they work in the future?

~PEACE~
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
You seem more versed in science then Me. And you're probably right.

Can you extrapolate on the things you mentioned. I don't know how "3 body orbital mechanics work", I don't know how lasers ACTUALLY work. And why can't you " just scrape gravity sources together without de-stablizling the Star System"?

You seem more astute in science then this layman aka Me.

I just came up with a crazy notion that I don't know would work or not and I figured I would posit it for the scientists on rollitup.

Maybe the "solar lasers" can't work right now, but could they work in the future?

~PEACE~
Very reasonable. I am much older and in the business, an actual scientist in the computer world, etc. No problems. We learn as we go.

These are great ideas. But, you don't need lasers just the mirrors in various orbits. Convex mirrors can concentrate sunlight and beam it around the system. Light sails don't need laser, they need a big wide heavy push. So, propulsion beaming is what you are really describing. And we are working on it.

We don't need new planets. We don't need to drag gravity sources together and get unpredictable 3 body orbit results.

We can terraform Mars. Read Red Mars. 3 books. Ends with Green Mars.

Keep thinking and I am glad you came back for more. Keep thinking.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
Well, I sight a pretty content free reply. :)

If you are saying there is no physics behind terrraforming Mars, that is not even close to true.

So, still waiting for your content.
 

Pepe le skunk

Well-Known Member
George,
The funny thing is you don't have to do anything and the stars will move. So do solar systems. They rotate around on an orbital plane and actually wobble. It takes 250,000,000 years to go once around to get back to the same area for the milkyway galaxy.. Milkyway also wobbles every 65 million years from top to bottom in the galactic plane.

If you really think you are christ then I recommend you don't tell anyone. Didn't work out well for the last guy claiming to be him. Seriously you need to watch a movie called Zietguist. You can learn how you were indoctornated into your religion. The first 20 minutes should do. Also watch the history channel and science channel for a year. It might open your eyes. There is zero evidence that heaven or hell, god or the devil exist. Everything you have been taught concerning religion has been used to control people for centuries. Anything written in the bible has been rewritten many times by humans and mistranslatted many times. A good series to watch is the new one on the bible on History Channel.

Good luck to you George.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
That seems to be stuff they were discussing in another forum. He has not said that here.
 
Top