Fox News Does Cringeworthy Segment On Homeless People

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
So wait. Are we to assume that if you do not attach a citation to every one of your posts, that you are just making shit up again?
it means it can be fact, fiction or opinion. not everything needs citation, though:

fact: barack obama is the president of the US.

fact social norm: when walking; you typically walk to the right and let others pass you in the opposite direction on your left..is this written? no..but accepted social norm.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
go set up a homestead in alaska like dick proenneke did, and i am sure you will have no problem if i set up a petroleum refinery next door that pollutes your land.

because zoning regulations are so evil, right?
that's depends, was it consensual?
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
You've never refuted the point I made that government policies can create homelessness.

Might I suggest you get off the meth and address one thing at a time? I'll never understand why you beat your wife either.
MOP is the real culprit of homelessness..they are a vile, nasty peoples.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
MOP is the real culprit of homelessness..they are a vile, nasty peoples.
Mop maybe vile and nasty, (I don't know about them) but they are not the real cause of homelessness.

Coercive government is the real cause, coincidentally they too are vile and nasty people. I could lay out why my statement is true, but I don't want to take your mind off your Bernie Sanders fantasies.
 

LurchLurkin

Active Member
Politics crack me up. Small government? Sure, then there wont be any central authority to stop some rich guy from hiring an army and taking over. Or many rich guys..whatever, we can be like the dark ages with nobles who have castles subjugating the poor.

Speaking of subjugation. I find it very funny that people often think that it couldn't have been so bad for the slaves, especially the house ones, after all - they had a roof, food, and a place to lay their head. Predominantly the demographic of those who hold this view is entitled, white, and christian. Ironically, these same people are so afraid of communism and would fight it to the death. Why? You get a roof, food, and a place to lay your head - not so bad eh? At the least you likely wouldn't even be tortured, whipped, beaten and raped as much as they were.

Speaking of christians, why's everyone so butt hurt about the gays? Get it? Butt hurt? hahah! After all, the old testament endorsed polygamy, incest, rape, etc. Jesus never condemned the old testament when he came, but said something like that he was there to affirm it or what not. Muhammad fucked a 9 year old girl whom he wed when she was 6 too.

Look, fellas, both sides of the aisle have their head so far up their ass they're bound to find a golden turd every now and then, but predominantly they're just regular old stanky turds. The predominant reason is that the elite have managed to circumvent the separation of powers and de facto enact a sort of dark ages with nobles who have castles subjugating the poor somewhat explained by Mill's Power Elite Theory. The real funny thing about this is that they're ultimately worse off for it. Sure, kings had a dude following them around with a private toilet who wiped his ass. They also didn't have windows, weren't exempt from being ravaged by lice or disease, and the best medicine they had was blood letting.

It was when there was a large influx of gold into europe (unfortunately from exploitation) and guns were invented (allowing the poor to kill their rich oppressors) that the masses weren't just forced to barely get by with subsistence farming (minimum wage anyone?). So now we had a situation where it wasn't just a few rich entitled twats like plato, volta, etc. who were able to innovate - there was a larger pool of people. BAM - industrial revolution. All humans have the same chance genetically to be great - more or less - some people are born with more intellect than others but it has nothing to with race or creed (albeit religion is for tools). The difference being, when you're born to a rich family you have a chance to succeed - when you're born to a poor family, and especially if you're a minority (black man with a college degree less likely to get a call back on a job interview than a white man with a felony) and are not offered the same chances to succeed of course you're not going to get as far ahead. As history has shown, the whole of the world is worse for this. So drink up you gluttonous aristocrats - when there's no cure for your cancer you have your own greed to thank.
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Politics crack me up. Small government? Sure, then there wont be any central authority to stop some rich guy from hiring an army and taking over. Or many rich guys..whatever, we can be like the dark ages with nobles who have castles subjugating the poor.

Speaking of subjugation. I find it very funny that people often think that it couldn't have been so bad for the slaves, especially the house ones, after all - they had a roof, food, and a place to lay their head. Predominantly the demographic of those who hold this view is entitled, white, and christian. Ironically, these same people are so afraid of communism and would fight it to the death. Why? You get a roof, food, and a place to lay your head - not so bad eh? At the least you likely wouldn't even be tortured, whipped, beaten and raped as much as they were.

Speaking of christians, why's everyone so butt hurt about the gays? Get it? Butt hurt? hahah! After all, the old testament endorsed polygamy, incest, rape, etc. Jesus never condemned the old testament when he came, but said something like that he was there to affirm it or what not. Muhammad fucked a 9 year old girl whom he wed when she was 6 too.

Look, fellas, both sides of the aisle have their head so far up their ass they're bound to find a golden turd every now and then, but predominantly they're just regular old stanky turds. The predominant reason is that the elite have managed to circumvent the separation of powers and de facto enact a sort of dark ages with nobles who have castles subjugating the poor somewhat explained by Mill's Power Elite Theory. The real funny thing about this is that they're ultimately worse off for it. Sure, kings had a dude following them around with a private toilet who wiped his ass. They also didn't have windows, weren't exempt from being ravaged by lice or disease, and the best medicine they had was blood letting.

It was when there was a large influx of gold into europe (unfortunately from exploitation) and guns were invented (allowing the poor to kill their rich oppressors) that the masses weren't just forced to barely get by with subsistence farming (minimum wage anyone?). So now we had a situation where it wasn't just a few rich entitled twats like plato, volta, etc. who were able to innovate - there was a larger pool of people. BAM - industrial revolution. All humans have the same chance genetically to be great - more or less - some people are born with more intellect than others but it has nothing to with race or creed (albeit religion is for tools). The difference being, when you're born to a rich family you have a chance to succeed - when you're born to a poor family, and especially if you're a minority (black man with a college degree less likely to get a call back on a job interview than a white man with a felony) and are not offered the same chances to succeed of course you're not going to get as far ahead. As history has shown, the whole of the world is worse for this. So drink up you gluttonous aristocrats - when there's no cure for your cancer you have your own greed to thank.
when MOP realized the value of the twigs is when they started giving everyone the 'raise' of cleaning their property and then charging the peasants for the same wood they just cleared..

your last paragraph is the single best argument for inheritance tax of 80%.

+rep sock puppet :clap:
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
when MOP realized the value of the twigs is when they started giving everyone the 'raise' of cleaning their property and then charging the peasants for the same wood they just cleared..

your last paragraph is the single best argument for inheritance tax of 80%.

+rep sock puppet :clap:
An active member since Aug 2004 is a sock puppet, says who? One idiot calling everyone racists and sock puppets is enough for any forum. Leave it to the douche who shall not be named.

Mop maybe vile and nasty, (I don't know about them) but they are not the real cause of homelessness.

Coercive government is the real cause, coincidentally they too are vile and nasty people. I could lay out why my statement is true, but I don't want to take your mind off your Bernie Sanders fantasies.
I looked up MOP on the Guglee', not one organization or definition makes any sense.

Top results:

Mash Out Posse
Definition from Dictionary.com
MOP Products
Management of Profolios
Magnetosphere of Outer Planets
Ministry of Planning

Yup, these are some evil bastards.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Politics crack me up. Small government? Sure, then there wont be any central authority to stop some rich guy from hiring an army and taking over. Or many rich guys..whatever, we can be like the dark ages with nobles who have castles subjugating the poor.

Speaking of subjugation. I find it very funny that people often think that it couldn't have been so bad for the slaves, especially the house ones, after all - they had a roof, food, and a place to lay their head. Predominantly the demographic of those who hold this view is entitled, white, and christian. Ironically, these same people are so afraid of communism and would fight it to the death. Why? You get a roof, food, and a place to lay your head - not so bad eh? At the least you likely wouldn't even be tortured, whipped, beaten and raped as much as they were.

Speaking of christians, why's everyone so butt hurt about the gays? Get it? Butt hurt? hahah! After all, the old testament endorsed polygamy, incest, rape, etc. Jesus never condemned the old testament when he came, but said something like that he was there to affirm it or what not. Muhammad fucked a 9 year old girl whom he wed when she was 6 too.

Look, fellas, both sides of the aisle have their head so far up their ass they're bound to find a golden turd every now and then, but predominantly they're just regular old stanky turds. The predominant reason is that the elite have managed to circumvent the separation of powers and de facto enact a sort of dark ages with nobles who have castles subjugating the poor somewhat explained by Mill's Power Elite Theory. The real funny thing about this is that they're ultimately worse off for it. Sure, kings had a dude following them around with a private toilet who wiped his ass. They also didn't have windows, weren't exempt from being ravaged by lice or disease, and the best medicine they had was blood letting.

It was when there was a large influx of gold into europe (unfortunately from exploitation) and guns were invented (allowing the poor to kill their rich oppressors) that the masses weren't just forced to barely get by with subsistence farming (minimum wage anyone?). So now we had a situation where it wasn't just a few rich entitled twats like plato, volta, etc. who were able to innovate - there was a larger pool of people. BAM - industrial revolution. All humans have the same chance genetically to be great - more or less - some people are born with more intellect than others but it has nothing to with race or creed (albeit religion is for tools). The difference being, when you're born to a rich family you have a chance to succeed - when you're born to a poor family, and especially if you're a minority (black man with a college degree less likely to get a call back on a job interview than a white man with a felony) and are not offered the same chances to succeed of course you're not going to get as far ahead. As history has shown, the whole of the world is worse for this. So drink up you gluttonous aristocrats - when there's no cure for your cancer you have your own greed to thank.
I didn't read the whole pile, but the highlighter sentence was darn funny. Thanks for that.

Are you familiar with the history of communism? Stalin and Mao might be your poster boys, but they have the rapin' and murderin' down pat!
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
An active member since Aug 2004 is a sock puppet, says who? One idiot calling everyone racists and sock puppets is enough for any forum. Leave it to the douche who shall not be named.



I looked up MOP on the Guglee', not one organization or definition makes any sense.

Top results:

Mash Out Posse
Definition from Dictionary.com
MOP Products
Management of Profolios
Magnetosphere of Outer Planets
Ministry of Planning

Yup, these are some evil bastards.
while i appreciate your fanship swollowing me from thread to thread..i must say RIU has only been in business since like 2008 or 2009.

so what's your point?

:lol:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
An active member since Aug 2004 is a sock puppet, says who? One idiot calling everyone racists and sock puppets is enough for any forum. Leave it to the douche who shall not be named.
i am so in your head that you refuse to even utter my name. that's some serious ownage.

but sadly for you, pretending i don't exist will not prevent me from pointing out how incredibly stupid you are. even infants have a better grasp on object permanence than that.

for example, august of 2004 and august of 2014 are two vastly different times.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I didn't read the whole pile, but the highlighter sentence was darn funny. Thanks for that.

Are you familiar with the history of communism? Stalin and Mao might be your poster boys, but they have the rapin' and murderin' down pat!
bill clinton called, he won the cold war so you on't have to spam every thread with your unnecessary worries about communism, as if they were somehow legitimate.

you can save all that for your klan chapter, they eat that stupid shit right up!
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
while i appreciate your fanship swollowing me from thread to thread..i must say RIU has only been in business since like 2008 or 2009.

so what's your point?

:lol:
Ok, I typed 2004 instead of 2014, my bad. Not following you, you keep posting in threads I'm active in. My point is how do you know he's a sock puppet when he's been active since August of 2014?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Ok, I typed 2004 instead of 2014, my bad. Not following you, you keep posting in threads I'm active in. My point is how do you know he's a sock puppet when he's been active since August of 2014?
i thought you said you were no longer concerned about sock puppets (after having previously been concerned).

why you flip flopping again, douchenozzle?
 
Top