UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
like a sock puppet cares.
Duck Dynasty Plucked
- Thread starter Wavels
- Start date
ahh, the "new" white man's burden. Because those minorities just aren't capable of sticking up for themselves are they?
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i stick up for what's right and don't let racist, bigoted people like you discourage me from speaking my mind.
tell me again how having green eyes is a malformity.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you said it was a disability. disabilities are not neutral.
i don't know why i even bother humoring a subway sandwich maker.
Blue eyed people are more sensitive to light.
Cite to it or stfu... Provide thread title and post number. You're full of shit.
If I said it was a disability, I misspoke. I do not think I did, however. But the vast majority of the time when speaking of it I have used malformity or disorder. I have purposely tried to avoid that word.
I think you're full of shit. If I said disability, i would lay money that it was in a response to a post you made, where you used the word disability.
Disability is a word I don't use for this, because there is no ability that is impaired. The only exception is I have called homosexuality a sexual disability, because the purpose of sexuality is reproduction. Reproductive ability is impaired when one is not attracted to the opposite sex. That is a limited disability, and has no real bearing on anything important.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
funny, the purpose of sexuality for most people is to have a great orgasm. for most people, sexuality also serves the purpose of intimacy, human bonds, relaxation, and a lot of other things.
i don't think my lesbian friends worry too much whether they can make a baby come out of each other's vaginas by rubbing them to furious orgasm.
they don't even seem to have any disorders or malformities. they seem to be perfectly normal and having fun.
i bet if they wanted to, they could even take the DNA from a close family member from one side and cross it with the egg of the other and have what are basically their very own biological children.
reproduction problem solved and they can still go on lapping at each other's beautiful vaginas until they thrive in delight.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i must have missed that part yet again. when exactly did you totally PWNT me like a n00b because you are so 733T?
Those are all emotional affects of a biological function. Of course it feels good, but that's a side effect, we would still do it if it didn't if only to propagate the species.
The intimacy is a result of the human tendency to limit sexual reproduction to a single partner. That intimacy is lacking in the random hook ups in which we have all engaged.
Nice try.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
the purpose of a male biological organs is to produce sperm externally. the purpose of female biological organs is to house a fertilized egg internally. they have no other purposes, they can be used as the owner sees fit.
unless, of course, you are assigning intention to things, which is something a pseudo-intellectual, evangelizing, bible thumping, moron who is 30 works at subway would do.
the purposes of sexuality are manyfold and some have been mentioned already.
disorder doesn't enter the equation until you start fucking things that can't or didn't consent, disability doesn't enter the equation until you are unable to fuck things that do consent, and malformity enters the equation when your particular anomaly gets you on efukt because half of your penis seems to be missing.
for those of you wondering, just google "efukt headless penis".
That was a very good third-grade-level explanation. I'm proud of you, you get a gold star!
You seem, however, to be unable to fathom the distinction between biological sexuality and emotional/psychological sexuality. It's ok, this might be a collegiet understanding, and since college was too difficult for you to complete, you never had thee opportunity to learn.
Got your panties in a wad Canna?
Perhaps you're reading something into my statement that doesn't exist, in fact I'm sure of it. I'm celebrating free speech and that is not hate my friend.
I don't agree with bible thumpers and I don't agree with men having sex with other men, but what they both do and think in their personal lives is their business and their right. And I'll support those rights, whether I agree or disagree with both of them.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
*collegiate
my GPA was fine. i went to college to learn, and wasn't learning anything. i didn't get hooked on dope and start stealing from my parents like you.
you're trying to assign intention to nature, which is what a bible thumper does. and it's a dumb argument.
you don't get this because you are now hooked on bible.
Blue eye color is not a "malformity." That word implies that it is a mistake, a deviation from some plan. There is no plan. Differences in eye color are the result of perfectly normal and natural variations in the human genome, and they have no impact on survival.
Is that supposed distinction rooted in the same discredited research that you were citing earlier and then didn't even bother defending? If not, where is it from?
heckler73
Well-Known Member
Do I get paid a fee for his defense?
After I receive the funds, I'll gladly put in an appeal of insanity.
when you are born you're eyes are blue, but not a true blue more of a muddy blue thereafter it changes to it's final genetic disposition.
when you die they turn back to that color of muddy blue.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
is that really something you think about?