DNC Email Leak

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
The honor was for the crime.
Are you willing to excuse Clinton when it's found that she knew what DWS was doing?

That makes me WANT to hurt her in the voters booth.

It's almost worth 4 years of Trump to see the look of defeat on Hillary's lying cheating face.

She hurt my Bernie. Now she pays..
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Fair enough, I thought you were replying to me and I felt like ranting because @Fogdog summoned me to the thread calling me an accelerationist.
I wasn't calling you an accelerationist. I've never used that term about anybody. Other than calling Trump a fascist, which he does most clearly fit, I've stuck with the mundane left-right and authoritarian-libertarian matrix. A lot of times labels are used to control a discussion. This was not my intent.

In an earlier post, you said that you didn't like Bernie because he would delay the revolution. It was a while ago and the quote isn't exact, it's my interpretation of what you said. So, that's why I mentioned you. You want a revolution and I think Trump will put us on that path. He's a clod and a narcissist to the extreme. He loves him some dictators, that's his style. I think you are underestimating Trump's vision for a racist, bigoted, police state that he most certainly is telling people he plans to implement.

I also don't see Hillary as dripping with blood from her machinations in the State Dept. When she initiates an Iraq-like invasion you can happily bash me for saying: I don't think that's the direction we are headed. I think there will be fewer military interventions with a Democratically controlled government rather than more.
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
If you vote Trump, THAT will definitely hurt her.

If you vote Stein..it sends a message, but no hurt will be delivered as neither she nor Trump gets it.
If you vote for Bernie your vote wont be counted. Bernie has to register as running for president in order for your write-in to count. Same goes for Colorado. It won't have any effect at all.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member



If Clinton loses, she and the DNC will have cost us a progressive supreme court for the next few decades because of the bullshit they pulled
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
FBI has opened investigation on this.

Wait until they all find out HRH was in on it.

Then what?

I love how those here try to equate each cheat with about 500k in voters..according to @Fogdog she hasn't had enough in lies and cheats to have any effect on primary nom.
Then what....

Nothing.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I wasn't calling you an accelerationist. I've never used that term about anybody. Other than calling Trump a fascist, which he does most clearly fit, I've stuck with the mundane left-right and authoritarian-libertarian matrix. A lot of times labels are used to control a discussion. This was not my intent.

In an earlier post, you said that you didn't like Bernie because he would delay the revolution. It was a while ago and the quote isn't exact, it's my interpretation of what you said. So, that's why I mentioned you. You want a revolution and I think Trump will put us on that path. He's a clod and a narcissist to the extreme. He loves him some dictators, that's his style. I think you are underestimating Trump's vision for a racist, bigoted, police state that he most certainly is telling people he plans to implement.

I also don't see Hillary as dripping with blood from her machinations in the State Dept. When she initiates an Iraq-like invasion you can happily bash me for saying: I don't think that's the direction we are headed. I think there will be fewer military interventions with a Democratically controlled government rather than more.
You described accelerationist ideology. That's not why I consider Clinton the greater evil. Also, you have misinterpreted my critique of Sanders. I call him a sheep dawg who tries to redirect revolutionary elements into supporting a counter revolutionary party but calls it a political revolution. You're abusing the shit out of my words and views and tagging me in a post because more than likely you guys can't take the heat you're receiving for supporting Clinton. Nobody likes her, even her supporters apparently. The dnc is getting roasted by lefties in Philly. Conservatives are even willing to vote for a piece of shit like Trump in order to keep her and her election rigging party of seasoned war hawks from having basically all the power in the gov't.

If Trump wins, he will still be an ineffective ass hole of a joke who won't get shit done while the gop loses what little power it still holds. That's not accelerationist (you didn't use the word but it's what you're talking about) that's pragmatism. That makes a Clinton presidency a much bigger threat to democracy and liberty worldwide.

If you vote for her, I hold you responsible for your complicity in election fraud and I will indeed be sure to remind you when the US military starts a body count or more likely pretends there isn't one. I'm sure your liberal blinders will let you pretend foreign policy doesn't exist.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You described accelerationist ideology. That's not why I consider Clinton the greater evil. Also, you have misinterpreted my critique of Sanders. I call him a sheep dawg who tries to redirect revolutionary elements into supporting a counter revolutionary party but calls it a political revolution. You're abusing the shit out of my words and views and tagging me in a post because more than likely you guys can't take the heat you're receiving for supporting Clinton. Nobody likes her, even her supporters apparently. The dnc is getting roasted by lefties in Philly. Conservatives are even willing to vote for a piece of shit like Trump in order to keep her and her election rigging party of seasoned war hawks from having basically all the power in the gov't.

If Trump wins, he will still be an ineffective ass hole of a joke who won't get shit done while the gop loses what little power it still holds. That's not accelerationist (you didn't use the word but it's what you're talking about) that's pragmatism. That makes a Clinton presidency a much bigger threat to democracy and liberty worldwide.

If you vote for her, I hold you responsible for your complicity in election fraud and I will indeed be sure to remind you when the US military starts a body count or more likely pretends there isn't one. I'm sure your liberal blinders will let you pretend foreign policy doesn't exist.
When Hillary doesn't invade another country, hold me responsible for that too.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I believe that Bernie would have fought for these things. I simply don't believe Mrs Clinton will, based on a good look at her donor list.
So Bernie supports, endorsed and says he will vote for Hillary. How can you cling to your claims of fraud and corruption when the very guy you believe in has decided to cast his lot with Clinton?
 
Top