DNC Email Leak

Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Proof positive the Clinton campaign was collaborating with the DNC and the DNC was collaborating with the media, namely MSNBC and CNN, to stack the primary against Sanders


DWS asks for Tim Canova's name to be removed from CNN headline

Washington Post and DNC joint unlisted fundraising party



DNC plot to 'expose' Sanders as an atheist

Comms Director goes running to Chuck Todd, telling him Morning Joe aren't allowed to criticize Debbie WS. "This is the LAST straw. Please call Phil a Griffin. This is outrageous. She needs to apologize."

"Yes, Super PAC paying young voters to push back online on Sanders supporters"


Search the database here
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
Phake skandul. Misogynists. Kulaks. Wreckers.
Click to expand...
didn't you predict that hillary would be indicted? and would go to prison?

does it hurt that you are always wrong about everything, all the time? that's gotta bruise your tender little ego a bit, i suppose.

keep it up though, because i find it hilarious.

not quite as hilarious as the time i doxxed you dead to rights as a white supremacist cop and never even got in trouble for it, but it's getting close now.

by the way, how does having such a tiny penis work when your wife is so fat? does it even work? or does she make you wear a strap on? given the amount of complaining you have done about gays, it would be a safe bet to say that she's probably the one wearing the strap on, at your request no less.

anyhoo, have a good day, white supremacist cop.
 
desert dude

desert dude

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
didn't you predict that hillary would be indicted? and would go to prison?

does it hurt that you are always wrong about everything, all the time? that's gotta bruise your tender little ego a bit, i suppose.

keep it up though, because i find it hilarious.

not quite as hilarious as the time i doxxed you dead to rights as a white supremacist cop and never even got in trouble for it, but it's getting close now.

by the way, how does having such a tiny penis work when your wife is so fat? does it even work? or does she make you wear a strap on? given the amount of complaining you have done about gays, it would be a safe bet to say that she's probably the one wearing the strap on, at your request no less.

anyhoo, have a good day, white supremacist cop.
Click to expand...
You really need to post "my" personal info again. You need some relief, buddy. Go ahead and do it.

You can't get an erection. You are unable to plant a viable fetus in the family incubator. Sweet relief. You need it. Go ahead and out "me".

LOL
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
desert dude said:
You really need to post "my" personal info again. You need some relief, buddy. Go ahead and do it.

You can't get an erection. You are unable to plant a viable fetus in the family incubator. Sweet relief. You need it. Go ahead and out "me".

LOL
Click to expand...
awww, poor little shithead can't even come to terms with how constantly wrong he is. you shouted for months about how hillary would be indicted. you literally spent months doing nothing but being wrong.

that really must suck. but then again, you should be used to it by now. you also predicted a romney victory. always wrong.

anyhoo, i noticed you weren't addressing my question about the massive coincidence you are claiming has happened. is there really another person in east kern county who uses the online handle of 'desert dude' and shares your love of guns and white supremacy? seems like that would be a longshot.

you could dispel the myth by simply posting a proof picture, but my guess is that it would just turn out looking like a gun nut in front of a pickup truck adorned with the confederate flag.

anyhoo, keep on being wrong about everything, it is what you do best!
 
MeJuana

MeJuana

Well-Known Member
The thing is there is a lot of big wigs tied in through the Clinton's. For some odd reason that made me wonder how much the energy consumption of the U.S. armed forces was, it's huge from what I could find. Can you imagine the contracts for oil, gas, diesel, jet fuel and propane to support the U.S. armed forces. There's just so much money and so many powerful people for the Clinton's to even get slowed down by those emails much.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Proof positive the Clinton campaign was collaborating with the DNC and the DNC was collaborating with the media, namely MSNBC and CNN, to stack the primary against Sanders


DWS asks for Tim Canova's name to be removed from CNN headline

Washington Post and DNC joint unlisted fundraising party



DNC plot to 'expose' Sanders as an atheist

Comms Director goes running to Chuck Todd, telling him Morning Joe aren't allowed to criticize Debbie WS. "This is the LAST straw. Please call Phil a Griffin. This is outrageous. She needs to apologize."

"Yes, Super PAC paying young voters to push back online on Sanders supporters"


Search the database here
Click to expand...
As if we needed more proof.

I'm writing in Sanders.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
As if we needed more proof.

I'm writing in Sanders.
Click to expand...
Did it surprise anybody to see that the DNC and Hillary's campaign had great ties with the left-biased media outlets? Do you think that this was enough to explain the 3 million voter difference between Sanders and Clinton? I'm not surprised and I don't think this explains the better number of voters for Hillary.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
"She won fair and square"

I hope whoever believed that bullshit chokes on those words

That party is dead to me
Click to expand...
The election was not a fair contest. Hillary and her team understood how to connect with the media and had lots of time that Sanders did not. It's just like any contest between a more prepared contestant against an able but less prepared one. If the contest is close at all, the more prepared wins.

I'm not saying the best one won. And I'm not saying she won fair AND square. But I will say she won within the legal bounds. The rumpanistas are going to contend with a formidable opponent. I don't think they are prepared for her. On the other hand, Trump is playing by a different set of rules, which is why he still has a chance.
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Did it surprise anybody to see that the DNC and Hillary's campaign had great ties with the left-biased media outlets? Do you think that this was enough to explain the 3 million voter difference between Sanders and Clinton? I'm not surprised and I don't think this explains the better number of voters for Hillary.
Click to expand...
We were robbed in so many ways.

I wonder if Sanders has plans to bring action against them?
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
The election was not a fair contest. Hillary and her team understood how to connect with the media and had lots of time that Sanders did not. It's just like any contest between a more prepared contestant against an able but less prepared one. If the contest is close at all, the more prepared wins.

I'm not saying the best one won. And I'm not saying she won fair AND square. But I will say she won within the legal bounds. The rumpanistas are going to contend with a formidable opponent. I don't think they are prepared for her. On the other hand, Trump is playing by a different set of rules, which is why he still has a chance.
Click to expand...
The DNC actively campaigned against Sanders, it was much more than "she was just more prepared", they cheated, they broke the rules;

"Democratic Party Charter and Bylaws, Article 5, Section 4

The Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process."

Sanders won 46% of the popular vote, if he ran an "unprepared and disorganized" campaign, what does that say about the Clinton campaign with DNC collusion?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
The DNC actively campaigned against Sanders, it was much more than "she was just more prepared", they cheated, they broke the rules;

"Democratic Party Charter and Bylaws, Article 5, Section 4

The Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process."

Sanders won 46% of the popular vote, if he ran an "unprepared and disorganized" campaign, what does that say about the Clinton campaign with DNC collusion?
Click to expand...
DWS was riding the campaign trail with HRH.

Can it be more blatant?
 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Please don't think I have an axe to grind. I'm just interested in dialogue. This is a major explanation for three million voters more for Hillary than Bernie?
Click to expand...
It's a compilation of many factors. All of which have been discussed on the Bernie thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top