Crown Appeals Smith Decision

G

gb123

Well-Known Member
let them fight patients. They're fighting a loosing battle. This way it shows just what type of individuals the patients are dealing with. Individuals that suffer more financially than patients do health wise, and it shows. It'll all come out in the wash. Lets hope anyway.
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
So if we win again the extracts branch over canada as its going to the supreme court of canada?
 
j0yr1d3

j0yr1d3

Well-Known Member
bigmanc said:
So if we win again the extracts branch over canada as its going to the supreme court of canada?
Click to expand...
Yeah I would imagine this would be the case. I'm not a legal eagle by any means and this case kind of confused me as to what the win in the BC court of appeals meant for the rest of us (apparently it set precedent for all other provinces or something was my understanding). The case itself is a constitutional challenge so a win in the supreme court should apply to all medically approved patients.
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
You know what gets me, I'm fairly certain on the Form A it had 3 check boxes. 1 for inhalation another for oral and the 3rd being both.
 
j0yr1d3

j0yr1d3

Well-Known Member
Yeah I always wondered about the forms and how they can have shit about edibles and ingestion all over their website. Isn't that like entrapment or promoting a crime or something? I guess they expect people to literally just put "dried marihuana" in their cookies because were rabbits or something. Such fucked up backwards logic over at HC.
 
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
It's absurd that HC has any control over any of this. It's seems they shape the law whenever they see fit. I'm not sure how they seem to be " in charge " of actual law policy...way too much rope imo
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
That brings up the discussion of if health canada should be in control or the fda equivalent in canada
 
The Hippy

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
Seems to me that they must employ regular folks at HC. Are they doctor's or scientist's or technicians or professor's or lawyer's or even pharmacist's. I don't know this I must admit. Maybe they are??
But I do wonder what qualifies ANYBODY at HC to be involved in this at all. Let's face it, if you've never used MJ or MMJ then really, what do you know.
I've been in situations where we ( a bunch of regular people ) were making decisions for and about other people. I often thought if the people who need to follow these rules only knew who made them. We usually think that the people coming up with this stuff, "well they must know what they're doing "
And in reality it's just the guy down the street.
 
leaffan

leaffan

Well-Known Member
Don't kid yourself....HC has some very talented people on board, and they do know everything about marijuana. They won't admit it though...
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Found em ! (http://mmar.ca/pdfs/form_b2_e.pdf) Section B2-3 "method of ingestion 'Inhalation' or 'Oral'

B2-3

The Proposed Daily Amount
a. The proposed daily amount of dried marihuana is less than or equal to ______ grams.
b. The following method and form of administration (please check appropriate box)
:
o
Inhalation
o
Oral

Note to Physicians: For more information on daily amounts, you can refer to the following documents:
• Information for Health Care Professionals — Marihuana
• Daily Amount Fact Sheet
Both documents can be found on the Health Canada web site at
www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecs-secs/ocma/index.htm or
by calling toll free at 1-866-337-7705
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
I know when I spoke to my doctor for renewal, he asked how much I used in edibles and how much was smoked / vaped to determine my plant count.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top