Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

Moldy

Well-Known Member

Listen to this crazy son of a bitch
Tax the fucking church if they want to have a say in politics... otherwise... go away and do church things and leave other people alone to live there lives, even if you religious asswipes don't like it, learn a little tolerance, after all, we've had to tolerate people putting up crosses and other shit in the name of the make-believe.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Tax the fucking church if they want to have a say in politics... otherwise... go away and do church things and leave other people alone to live there lives, even if you religious asswipes don't like it, learn a little tolerance, after all, we've had to tolerate people putting up crosses and other shit in the name of the make-believe.
Many little boys have had to tolerate penis in their orifices due to religion too, so there's that also.

Religion = Run by paedos
 

Moldy

Well-Known Member
Many little boys have had to tolerate penis in their orifices due to religion too, so there's that also.

Religion = Run by paedos
Correct! Just think if pot smokers diddled little kids as much as the church leaders and followers have done we'd all be in prison or killed. Those unspeakable bastards all need to be locked up so they can't do it ever again, but no, they double down on the war on religion like evil never happened.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Correct! Just think if pot smokers diddled little kids as much as the church leaders and followers have done we'd all be in prison or killed. Those unspeakable bastards all need to be locked up so they can't do it ever again, but no, they double down on the war on religion like evil never happened.
robroy thinks it is OK to diddle kids as long as you pay them and they agree to it.
 

dabadaba

Active Member
Thanks maybe we should elect Pat Robertson!
After all Christians outnumber gays and lesbians 50 to 1.
 
Last edited:

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Thanks maybe we should elect Pat Robertson!
After all Christians outnumber gays and lesbians 50 to 1.
gays are viewed more favorably than you bible thumping morons though.

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2014/03/27/poll-gay-people-more-popular-than-evangelicals

53 percent of respondents held a favorable view of gay people, while 42 percent held a favorable view of evangelical Christians. Meanwhile, 18 percent of the likely voters surveyed held an unfavorable view of gay people, while 28 percent held a negative view of evangelical Christians.


cry now, beenthere.
 

dabadaba

Active Member
gays are viewed more favorably than you bible thumping morons though.

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2014/03/27/poll-gay-people-more-popular-than-evangelicals

53 percent of respondents held a favorable view of gay people, while 42 percent held a favorable view of evangelical Christians. Meanwhile, 18 percent of the likely voters surveyed held an unfavorable view of gay people, while 28 percent held a negative view of evangelical Christians.


cry now, beenthere.

Thats all you have a poll commissioned by a gay group that has long been proven BS.
"Democrat pollster rigs sample in poll commissioned by gay activists; claims gays more popular than evangelical"
http://www.subwaytodamascus.com/2015/04/democrat-pollster-rigs-sample-in-poll.html


Try again puppet maybe on one of your many other screen names.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Thats all you have a poll commissioned by a gay group that has long been proven BS.
"Democrat pollster rigs sample in poll commissioned by gay activists; claims gays more popular than evangelical"
http://www.subwaytodamascus.com/2015/04/democrat-pollster-rigs-sample-in-poll.html


Try again puppet maybe on one of your many other screen names.
gee, when was the last time i heard you crow on for months about oversampling, beenthere?

wasn't it back in 2012, when you claimed democrats were being oversampled, thereby skewing the polls?

most people ould learn from that embarrassing debacle, beenthere.

but not you, you are a special brand of stupid.

congrats on your third sock puppet, bitch.
 

panhead

Well-Known Member
I have the right to fuk my wife up the ass as much as she will allow me to , same goes for homosexuals , nobody gives a shit about sex its about spousal privledge, which again is ridiculous, i dont see how spousal rights are unamerican .
 

panhead

Well-Known Member
All cuz a dick went into a man`s mouth.....then up his ass, a new culture was born because it sure wasn`t a baby......
A new culture is born ?

An entire country has been fucking each other up the ass since the days of sparta , where do you think the term "Greek" for anal sex came from , soldier dudes in moses robes bending over another soldier , lifting his robe & banging the hell out of his ass .
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I have the right to fuk my wife up the ass as much as she will allow me to , same goes for homosexuals , nobody gives a shit about sex its about spousal privledge, which again is ridiculous, i dont see how spousal rights are unamerican .
I think these people are genuinely concerned with what other people do with their own private parts. Imo, that's worse than fanatics who support the drug war. How the hell can you call yourself a conservative in any sense of the word if the thing you're most concerned with is gay sex?

You know how many straight people I know who care about the sex someone else has?

0
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
robroy thinks it is OK to diddle kids as long as you pay them and they agree to it.
Inaccurate Meathead. I think it is heinous. The point I've made is that some people, even children, can and do consent to heinous acts.

You've never answered the question...

How does the nature of an act, even a heinous one, affect whether or not the act was consented to?


You seem intent on making shit up. Didn't you admit to committing a heinous, yet consensual act, shitting on a floor, when you were a "child"?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
I think these people are genuinely concerned with what other people do with their own private parts. Imo, that's worse than fanatics who support the drug war. How the hell can you call yourself a conservative in any sense of the word if the thing you're most concerned with is gay sex?

You know how many straight people I know who care about the sex someone else has?

0

Well, it's encouraging that you believe people should own their own bodies and have the right to make those choices which suit them as individuals. Thank you.

It would be more encouraging if you were consistent though and believed that people also own the product of their labor and have the right to make other voluntary choices or refuse them when some people force "choices" on them.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Well, it's encouraging that you believe people should own their own bodies and have the right to make those choices which suit them as individuals. Thank you.

It would be more encouraging if you were consistent though and believed that people also own the product of their labor and have the right to make other voluntary choices or refuse them when some people force "choices" on them.
It would also be nice if you acknowledged rightful ownership of property, but you don't, and that's why your entire philosophy is flawed from the start
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Tax the fucking church if they want to have a say in politics... otherwise... go away and do church things and leave other people alone to live there lives, even if you religious asswipes don't like it, learn a little tolerance, after all, we've had to tolerate people putting up crosses and other shit in the name of the make-believe.
that's what sucks..religion is non-profit 501(c)(3)..how often does anyone see atheists on the side of the road with signs?

they're supposed to be 'a-political'..they're anything but.

'do as i say not as i do'..it's in the gospel according to matthew..thank's be to god..ooops forgot where i was..

The warning Matthew's Jesus (23:1-12) is issuing to those under the influence of the Pharisees of the time is "Do as they say (for, after all, they sit on Moses' seat), but not as they do."

this country was founded on the premise of 'religious freedom' dating back to the colonies..religion was politics back then and you joined in or risk being labled 'heretic or witch'..those who were found to be these things were merely political scapegoats for most were monied single women with an opinion and not church goers, not a good thing in 1692. seems as if it's not a good thing in 2015, either.

and if i'm not mistaken, the night before the witches death her home and belongings were inventoried prior to hanging and turned over to the church..religion is evil incarnate.
 
Top