Blacks Patrolling neighborhoods with guns

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Not stolen at all. It's still your property. It's just worthless now. Just like your non aggression principal
I'm sorry you had a hard time understanding my response. I realize some issues get a little complex for you when you spend all evening watching a lathe churn metal filings. Don't despair though, in a couple hours you'll get unchained from your oar and get to take a piss and have some of that yummy machine coffee in the break room.

If you go back and read my responses, the answers are there.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
You only own the right to the water on your property
dance
dance
dance
Would you consider flowing water thru owned land and water encompassed by owned land as two distinct kinds of property ?

Who occupied first is another thing to consider.

Murray Rothbard has a reasonable explanation for this too, perhaps I'll call him, but I bet that fucker will still be dead.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Would you consider flowing water thru owned land and water encompassed by owned land as two distinct kinds of property ?

Who occupied first is another thing to consider.

Murray Rothbard has a reasonable explanation for this too, perhaps I'll call him, but I bet that fucker will still be dead.
Are you saying I now cant do what I want with my land?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
i assume that's why robbyboy wants to re-legalize discrimination based solely on skin color.
Nope.

I want to assure all people have the right of self determination of themself and their property, but not that of others. I want that right for everybody regardless of gender, race, etc. I want the INDIVIDUAL to decide with whom he or she will interact or not interact. You do not. You think its okay for some people to make others do things they'd rather not EVEN when they are being peaceful on their own property.

You advocate the initiation of aggression, I do not. What's even worse, you advocate the initiation of it by a coercive government, on a pot website. Your logic is the logic of a Prohibitionist. Mine is not.


I bet you a thousand hypothetical Wendys cheese burgers you won't reply with a real answer to what I say below.

Do you "own" yourself ? Do you own your property? If you answer yes to those two questions, please explain who has the right to make you interact with others you'd prefer not to. If you answer no, please pick more cotton, Abandon Conflict needs money for another drink.
 

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Your non aggression principle falls flat on its face
now your flailing incoherently
you won't even acknowledge that without a government you cannot even define the borders of your property nor control the natural resources of your property.
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
I control my borders with a lunch tray. Cross the line and you're gonna get a smack down. Plain and simple.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Nope.

I want to assure all people have the right of self determination of themself and their property, but not that of others. I want that right for everybody regardless of gender, race, etc. I want the INDIVIDUAL to decide with whom he or she will interact or not interact. You do not. You think its okay for some people to make others do things they'd rather not EVEN when they are being peaceful on their own property.

You advocate the initiation of aggression, I do not. What's even worse, you advocate the initiation of it by a coercive government, on a pot website. Your logic is the logic of a Prohibitionist. Mine is not.


I bet you a thousand hypothetical Wendys cheese burgers you won't reply with a real answer to what I say below.

Do you "own" yourself ? Do you own your property? If you answer yes to those two questions, please explain who has the right to make you interact with others you'd prefer not to. If you answer no, please pick more cotton, Abandon Conflict needs money for another drink.
yeah, i bet you'll kick black people out of your store in a totally non-aggressive manner, robbyboy.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
yeah, i bet you'll kick black people out of your store in a totally non-aggressive manner, robbyboy.

Get back to work. Abandon Conflict needs his money.

I bet you a thousand Wendys cheeseburgers you can't find that I ever said I chose my associations based on race. I just don't think it's up to me to chose other peoples associations for them. You do though, why? Why do you think you can own other people?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Get back to work. Abandon Conflict needs his money.

I bet you a thousand Wendys cheeseburgers you can't find that I ever said I chose my associations based on race. I just don't think it's up to me to chose other peoples associations for them. You do though, why? Why do you think you can own other people?
yeah, you just want to re-legalize skin color based discrimination because you're totally not racist.

you're just a selfless patriot who wants to see other people be able to discriminate against people based solely on skin color because you totally oppose aggression and racism.

right.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Your non aggression principle falls flat on its face
now your flailing incoherently
you won't even acknowledge that without a government you cannot even define the borders of your property nor control the natural resources of your property.

Speaking of incoherent...

Are you saying with a coercive government peoples property is protected and they enjoy full ownership?

You're funny. So please explain how that is and why that is so?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
yeah, you just want to re-legalize skin color based discrimination because you're totally not racist.

you're just a selfless patriot who wants to see other people be able to discriminate against people based solely on skin color because you totally oppose aggression and racism.

right.
I'm not a Patriot. I don't even like Tom Brady.

I oppose human interactions that are forced. You do not.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm not a Patriot. I don't even like Tom Brady.

I oppose human interactions that are forced. You do not.
good thing that no one is ever forced to open a business subject to civil rights then.

and that's by your own admission.

dumbass.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Youre out of time.
You have failed to defend your beliefs

I have all the time I need. You, get the weekend off, however on Monday.... back to the oar slave.

What are your beliefs? Do you think people should be left alone if they leave others alone or do you believe like Uncle Buck, that people should be forced to interact and prevented from controlling their own property ?

He's a prohibitionist, at least you are only 1/2 prohibitionist.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
that's the second "not racist just trolling" so far.

this thread has promise.

Since you favor gun control laws, and those were blacks asserting a right you want to take from them...

are you a racist?

Why do you think blacks shouldn't be able to defend themselves?

Why do you want to take away their rights?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Since you favor gun control laws, and those were blacks asserting a right you want to take from them...

are you a racist?

Why do you think blacks shouldn't be able to defend themselves?

Why do you want to take away their rights?
demonstrating for a second time that you are too stupid to understand what a presupposition is only makes you look dumber, robbyboy.

i am kicking your non-intellectual ass.
 
Top