I totally agree with you that it provides some much needed clarification. As someone who puts great effort into staying within the law I am one of those that wanted that clarification. However I do not agree that even the most compliant caregivers were following this setup since day 1, the fact that you need to now have each patients plants in a seperate locked enclosed facility violates most of us immediately and creates a ton of potential problems with maintaining a perpetual system. I know I havent seen one persons setup from michigan that has a seperate "facility" for each patients plants. Are you supposed to rip everything down and build 6 rooms, 1 for each patient, then take those rooms and divide them into veg and flower areas? I would need to run a minimum of 12 lights and that would be with each patients facility having only 1 veg and 1 flower light. That only takes into account the lighting issues that would arise. Do any of you honestly know a caregiver that built his op this way from the start? Hell I dont even think it is going to be possible in the spaces that some caregivers are currently growing in.
Written opinions of the state attorney general treated as law until or unless struck down by the courts, at least that is what my research is telling me. Do you have anything useful to add to the discussion? If AG written opinion being viewed as law is a fact, what good is saying this sucks I dont think that is right so Im just going to disregard it? Of course I hate being oppressed by my elected officials as much as the next person, my points are strictly from the view of a caregiver who is trying to stay fully compliant with a changing law.
no truer words have been written
