az 8

travisw

Well-Known Member
Why is this particular race relevant to the larger situation?
Last I saw, Debbie's lead was only a few points. In a neutral environment it should be substantially higher. Romney won the district with 25 points or so in 2012 , Trump took it with 22 points or so in 2016. Supposedly that district is 25% more Republican than the rest of the U.S..

The results in the 8th fit the pattern we've seen in the previous 9 special elections, namely, Democrats have outperformed the partisan baseline of the last two elections, by something like 17-18 points. It's the best anyone's done since 1994. Sort of like when the dems netted 30 seats and took back the house in 2006.

Their base turned out for this one. Debbie was no Roy Moore and she raised plenty of money. Republicans don't have a legitimate reason for how this happened.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Last I saw, Debbie's lead was only a few points. In a neutral environment it should be substantially higher. Romney won the district with 25 points or so in 2012 , Trump took it with 22 points or so in 2016. Supposedly that district is 25% more Republican than the rest of the U.S..

The results in the 8th fit the pattern we've seen in the previous 9 special elections, namely, Democrats have outperformed the partisan baseline of the last two elections, by something like 17-18 points. It's the best anyone's done since 1994. Sort of like when the dems netted 30 seats and took back the house in 2006.

Their base turned out for this one. Debbie was no Roy Moore and she raised plenty of money. Republicans don't have a legitimate reason for how this happened.
A win is a win.

I'll be pleasantly surprised if this precinct goes D.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Last I saw, Debbie's lead was only a few points. In a neutral environment it should be substantially higher. Romney won the district with 25 points or so in 2012 , Trump took it with 22 points or so in 2016. Supposedly that district is 25% more Republican than the rest of the U.S..

The results in the 8th fit the pattern we've seen in the previous 9 special elections, namely, Democrats have outperformed the partisan baseline of the last two elections, by something like 17-18 points. It's the best anyone's done since 1994. Sort of like when the dems netted 30 seats and took back the house in 2006.

Their base turned out for this one. Debbie was no Roy Moore and she raised plenty of money. Republicans don't have a legitimate reason for how this happened.
True that. GOP ran a candidate who was free from scandal, had a good turnout from Republicans yet still won in close race that had been a lock for Republicans for the most elections ever since Arizona has been a state.

Why is this particular race relevant to the larger situation?
Why does tty hate that buck said that Democrats are doing well?
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
True that. GOP ran a candidate who was free from scandal, had a good turnout from Republicans yet still won in close race that had been a lock for Republicans for the most elections ever since Arizona has been a state.



Why does tty hate that buck said that Democrats are doing well?
You have totally misrepresented my question.

This is becoming a pattern for you.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
You have totally misrepresented my question.

This is becoming a pattern for you.
Why do you hate it when people say Democrats are doing well?

Sorry to break this to you but this year is looking for Democrats to be a lot like 2006 when they took 30 seats away from Republicans and Pelosi was recognized as the leader who helped make this happen.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Why do you hate it when people say Democrats are doing well?

Sorry to break this to you but this year is looking for Democrats to be a lot like 2006 when they took 30 seats away from Republicans and Pelosi was recognized as the leader who helped make this happen.
That's got everything to do with your biases and nothing whatsoever to do with my question.

Jump to conclusions much?
 
Top