73Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuotePoison the well much?Originally Posted by Chief Walkin Eagle
The Science of Interconnectedness.
An amazing world view on how there truly is no such thing as being separate from anything in the universe. Dr. Rupert Sheldrake explains his scientific theory of interconnectedness that skeptics find so hard to accept do to their materialistic beliefs.
I feel no need to debate on this one because Sheldrake does it so beautifully already lol. At the bottom of the article there is a link to Sheldrakes website where he has more than a few debates hosted by well respected skeptical scientists (click "dialogues and controversies)". The majority of the audiences for these debates usually side with Sheldrake.
He even has a short discussion with Richard Dawkins who had a dogmatic agenda planned for Sheldrake but the discussion was cut short because Dawkins refused to talk about evidence for Sheldrakes theories because it didnt sit well with his "Enemies of Reason" project.
Poke around both websites, theres great stuff on both. Heres the link to the article. Tell me what ya think!
http://mindbook.ws/page/the-science-...rconnectedness
Poison the well much?
Somewhere, there is something incredible waiting to be confused for aliens.
Not really, thats what to be expected in that article. On his website he talks about healthy skepticism and how he was attacked and ridiculed but not disproved by scientists who wont even consider such theories because its one that doesnt fall into the materialistic paradigm.
Omfg this makes me horny. Lol! I love your posts.
"Life is but a momentary glimpse of the wonder of this astounding universe, and it is sad to see so many dreaming it away on spiritual fantasy."
- Carl Sagan
What is the thing called that is inbetween atoms? It's called space. No matter what you say Cheif, no matter how you feel, or the so called experiences you have had, you have no knowledge, nor proof, of everything being "interconnected" on an atomic level.
Yes, as far as we humans can tell, we all did come from the same stuffs of the universe, from the same point in spacetime that began spacetime, the big bang.
This in no means nor measure can exemplify the theory that we are all "interconnected" whether it be some sort of imaginary supernatural spiritual level, or an atomic level.
"Life is but a momentary glimpse of the wonder of this astounding universe, and it is sad to see so many dreaming it away on spiritual fantasy."
- Carl Sagan
Bro... That story... It is cool.
How can you, or anyone for that matter, be certain of anything? You, nor anyone else, can be. If you claim to be, you, and everyone else the wiser, will know you are a liar.
Not saying you are a liar, one love. But that when we tell ourselves we are certain of something we cannot be certain of... that is called lying.
"Life is but a momentary glimpse of the wonder of this astounding universe, and it is sad to see so many dreaming it away on spiritual fantasy."
- Carl Sagan
Like being certain that materialism is all there is to prove what is real? Or if gods real, its certain that no religion has any knowledge of him/her?
How about we keep this from turning into a shit show for once. I didnt throw the first rocks this time, I just stated what was already stated in the article. That this theory does not fall under materialistic paradigm thus resulting in ignorance by those who are so proud to hold that belief. Read the article and go to his website and check out the controversies section and listen to a debate hosted by skeptics that fail to disprove him in any way.
Im being a good boy this time, just playing by the rules is all. The fact that this theory doesnt fall under the materialist world view should not be offensive in anyway, since you should be uncertain that materialistic science is the best form of knowledge.
If this is indeed a science, why would we need to learn about it on woo sites like Mindbook? I see an article that's long on a blend of hypothesis and a recasting of magical terms in pseudomaterial terminology, and no emphasis at all on test. cn
"My god ... it's full of stars!" - David BowmanneerGreen 2: Soilless grow
Ah yes, a website that promotes spirituality, science, and knowledge is woo because it uses spirituality. Sheldrake is a real scientists who clashed heads with the likes of Richard Dawkins only for Dawkins to end the discussion because he only wanted to use biased and dogmatic tactics against Sheldrake and refused to discuss Sheldrakes controlled experiments and evidence. Dawkins knew that Sheldrakes evidence wouldnt look good for is tv show "Enemies Against Reason". If Sheldrake was really so illogical with his studies, why did Dawkins not want to discuss them? Go to the bottom of the article and click the link for Sheldrakes website and click on "Dialogues and Controversies" section and listen to a debate hosted by skeptics of higher stature then yourself and listen to them fail to dismantle Sheldrakes theories. The unbiased educated audiences of these debates tend to favor Sheldrake at the end of the debates and the well respected opposing skeptics hold strong to their "Nuh uhh!" stance. Sheldrake speaks of his evidence and controlled experiments on his website, failure to acknowledge that shows the same ignorance you showed when discussing unlimited/free energy with me. You dont want to know or even consider these things because that makes you happy and more comfortable about your world view.
Last edited by Chief Walkin Eagle; 08-18-2012 at 07:08 PM.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks