I enjoy all of your threads for or against, proven or unproven
also, if you have an idea and it is of sound reasoning, this means nothing for the capacity to persuade others of its validity. thats why we're here right now. some people disagree on what is sound, and what is bullshit. see the problem here?
For example, on some level, according to some phenomenologists, you believe the world still exists when you go to sleep at night, but no one has ever proved that to you: even a video of yourself sleeping is of questionable worth because it can only capture so much of the world. we just have faith that existence continues aside from our interaction with it; that the intersubjective constitution of reality hinges upon a diversity of perspectives, a diversity of points from whence reality may be constituted by the perceptions of living beings. this is just one way of looking at existence, used as an example which I think greatly obfuscates your statement,Padawan
so basically, yes, it is radically skeptical to say i think you're all fucking lying to me, if i have to take your facts just because someone else says your smart...see this is where the fetish for proof starts peeling back and revealing its own limitation.