Evolution and how life was formed on this earth does not bring into question wether or not there is a God. But it does make most religions look stupid. I am so tierd of religious types time and time again using poor arguments about the small chances of the random events that could have led to life and evolution ever happening, even though by saying there is such small chances they are admiting there is a chance it happend. Once you take the narrow views of your religion out of the equation God can still fit in nicely with evolution.

What say ye all

__________________
"Dope will get you through times of no money, better than money will get you through times of no dope" (Freewheeling Franklin)

Scientology is dumb....

__________________

Whats scientology got to do with the price of bacon. Isn't Scientology got something to do with aliens putting us here or something ?

__________________
"Dope will get you through times of no money, better than money will get you through times of no dope" (Freewheeling Franklin)

Puritans don't believe in evolution.
many Biblical scholars, especially Orthodox do believe in evolution
.
Evolution doesn't make most relegion look stupid. People do.
Many religous types don't accept evolution for the same reason many evolutionists won't accept the chance of a God.
They fancy themselves superior and feel smug by trying to make the other look bad.

__________________
Check out the stoner comedy tv series Ideal. Rent it, download it. Do what you gotta do to watch this funny show.

But evolution contradicts what most religions teach us, Adam and Eve????? Its the basses of the religions to control us with lies, thats why I say evolution makes the religions look stupid.

And your right, those evolutionists who wont accept a chance of god are just as close minded as the religions not accepting the chance of evolution.

I personally don't believe there is a God, but I am open to the concept and accept there could be and this would still fit in with evolution, but evolution can not fit in with the sriptures the religions base their faith on.

Until we do have all the answers we can only hedge our bets with the whats most likely and the information we have to date.

__________________
"Dope will get you through times of no money, better than money will get you through times of no dope" (Freewheeling Franklin)

I agree, In my life time i have seen a lot of evidence that evolution is real, and NO evidence that "god" is real...I believe that god and religion is used as a scapegoat for when people don't understand something about how we came to be..they can't settle with we don't comprehend and we may never.......god is the easy way out

__________________
bud-budder-buddest

The whole subject is very interesting i find..... BUT i have also found that trying to discuss this with someone who is not of the same page thinker or at least similar, (open mind helps to) is the same as arguing with a 5 year old you will not win "no matter what you say or prove/disprove"
dont get me wrong i am a fan of heracy as the religious folks call it (independent/free thinking as the Normal folks call it)
i like the way you think krustofskie + rep for you

If you keep Looking up for the Space God, You will never find evidence... I don't know why people use God to dispute Evolution, as the Two does not contradict with each Other.. The same people that dispute Space God are the Same as the People who Claim it.. Religion and God is as much as a Scapegoat for those who rely on Science to explain the world around them.. Science is a scapegoat for people who give up on thinking and lay captive to whatever their Science decides to unfold to them... Creative thinking allowed for the Theory of Relativity, E-=Mc2, Evolution, manipulation of electricty, etc. etc.. Science was/is the process of documenting and testing what was conceived by the creative thought gained by Observance.. as So it is with Religion, but instead it is not written, but experienced over and over again until a Formulation of understanding is Perceived..

totally Agree with your Assessment, I like the way KrusTo thinks too....

__________________
"He was dead just long enough for the murder rap to blow over. And then he had lunch." - Kujan

If you really dig into all the fossil evidence, you’ll
see there are no proven links that support
the claim that evolution occurred from one species to another. Modern textbooks have “filled in the blanks”
with assumptions, not facts. We have millions of fossils
in our museums today, and not one of them prove that there was ever a species-to-species transition.

http://www.evidenceforhope.com/Evolution%20versus%20Creation.html

__________________
1.http://gotquestions.org/crucial.html
2. http://www.godandscience.org/
3.http://www.carm.org/christianity/answers-seekers

If you really dig into Fish's post history, you'll see that he has repeatedly ignored the overwhelming amount of evidence that proves evolution. His lack of understanding has lead him to "fill in the blanks" with biased assumptions, whilst ignoring the documented facts.
We have millions of fossils in our museums today, and none of them are at odds with evolutionary theory. There are numerous documented "transitional fossils" (link), and a mountain of other evidence (genetics etc.).

As for you "really digging into the fossil record", that is a fucking joke. You have already proven that you simply skim articles looking for quotes that you can use. You don't even try to understand this stuff.