1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With QuoteToo bad this is not enforced whatsoever... the Smoke Report section is such a clusterfuck because stupid people can not read the fricken sticky.Originally Posted by rollitup
stoners are too lazy to do thatalready have.... but i have been on top of em.... but you are right, its gonna be a fight to keep it the way it should be......... if people would just read
give me a + to rep if my infomation helps may you be cursed with many buds
Too bad this is not enforced whatsoever... the Smoke Report section is such a clusterfuck because stupid people can not read the fricken sticky.
sorry... been really busy with life lately and got sidetracked on this mission....
someone coulda sent me a message, regardless, its better now
Go grow pot
strain: fruit automatic (its an autoflower grapefruit)
growth: 21/2 to 3 months seed to harvest
nutes: sctotts time released potting soil (3 month feed), and suger daddy in the flowering stage (1tsp per gallon of water)
yield: about 7 grams per plant
bag appeal: nice
smell: fruity grapefruit
taste: it realy has a grapefruit taste
high: its got a nice high
comments: its a very forgiving and fairly potent plant, great if your just learning (2 thumbs up)
Last edited by NewYorkweed; 06-04-2010 at 04:08 PM. Reason: I will put up pictures soon
I found these seeds on attitude and they r called the doggies nuts: BIG BAD JOHN, they claim to be perennial. If anyone knows anything about them please let me know, especially if they realy come back in the spring, and if they r worth my time and money. THANKS
Kong : Holy smoke seeds..outdoor uk
Strain: Kong [Holy Smoke seeds]
Growth: 4/5 foot
Nutes: BCuzz
Yield: 3.5 oz
Bag Appeal: rediculous deep funky fat and coated in crystalls
Smell: Sweet sharp and strong skunk
Taste: Sweet sugary floral
The High: More buzz than most my friends could handle ! Very strong
Comments: Grew really easilly hardly any nutes flowered real fast 7 weeks..Amazing !!
Last edited by imthezookeeper; 07-12-2010 at 12:15 PM.
I would prefer that people would use something more like what is found below. It tells more.
So & So’s Strain X
Overall Rating: 8
Potency: 9
Ease: 6
Odor Level: 8
Taste Level: 10
Grower's Tilt: 9
SI Rating: Not Listed
Effect: Somewhat couchlock
Stature: Somewhat tall and lanky
Phenotype: Sativa
Yield: 7
Indoor: 70 to 75 days
Outdoor: Oct 15 to Oct 31
Odor: Light musky/ fruity Appearance: 10
Taste: Nice earthy fruity mix.
Sexes: Feminized
Vintage: Not Listed
Bloom Wattage Used: 2100w to 5000w
Average Plant Height: 36
Plants per Sq. Foot: 1.00
Average Yield per Plant: 2.00
Pruning or Plant Style: Vertical
Fertilization Method: Organically fed
I would also like to see the size and type of lighting used.
343 You are not forgottenWater: The most essential compound
nice plants.. pic 5 looks like a X-mas tree... hahaha.. good shit
i have to comment that i DON'T like that statistical style of smoke reporting, ESPECIALLY in those "forget me EVER reading them wall of check boxes" ones.
bag appeal? i HATE sticky, skunky rock hard nugs! fluffy & easy to break apart columbian gold is what i like. that's too subjective to even comment on. in fact, it FORCES a bias towards indicas which only equal bag contempt for me
yield? how are you expected to know the yield on a bud you buy on the street or wherever? i can't even say what the yield was on the gear i grew as i didn't weigh it. haze skunk is a lot bigger and has a lot more buds than LSD is about as specific as i can get there.
it's a regimented and abstract way to define a strain's qualities that doesn't agree with me at all. it gets in the way of defining the SUBTLETIES of strains. it's to mechanical. my mind is allergic to abstractions. i ONLY speak in plain english and my favorite smoke reports do it that way too. i don't care how interested i am in a strain, if someone posts one of those HIDEOUS wall of checkboxes "smoke reports" you can't skim in a minute & get the idea on, i IGNORE it!
i like just reporting on "the high & comments". as hard as it is to find good lowdown on strains even when you beg & plead for it as i did for literally a couple years looking for "best indoor thai" at overgrow, are you REALLY going to toss out reports here when people do them their way in their own words?
i can SEE why the "format" would be needed for those, like so many, that don't know what an adjective is and that think "best shit i ever smoked!" or "this is some serious DANK!" is all the comment needed . as someone who can't stand couchlock one bit... THAT should be the one category mentioned in every strain report, but it gets overlooked in that list as well as in many of the reports i've read here. i read a ton of raves for jilly bean until i FINALLY stumbled on one that mentions it's stoney.
all those stats on "growth"... on the gear that i DID grow, i don't take any notes on flowering times etc. and could only tell you that LSD (well... flumpy's lowdown mystery actually) was the shortest strain i grew and that highland thai was the slowest & fussiest. all i care about is how a strain SMOKES. anything else is spam in my book.
all that other stuff belongs in grow reports and i hate grow reports because they never deliver the goods on the smoke reporting. smoke reporting is just that... telling how it tastes and how it affects you. yield has nothing to do with smoking. again, THAT too forces a bias towards indicas and there's all ready too much of that on the streets that it shouldn't be here too.
personally, i'd like to see the reporting split up by indicas and sativas. then i wouldn't have to waste so much time wading through crap i have no interest in looking for rare gear that gets you high.
Last edited by hazey grapes; 10-22-2011 at 10:30 PM.
Jack's Cleaner 2, Sweet Haze, Haze x Skunk & 8 Miles High are all much fun, but fluffy, fuzzy 1985 Columbian Gold popcorn's that trippy! Thai? Malawi Gold? Mekong Haze (Cambodian)? Don't know.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks