McCain Doesn't Need a Fact-Checker; the Media Edit His Mistakes for Him

Dankdude · #1 07-25-2008, 10:47 AM

McCain Doesn't Need a Fact-Checker; the Media Edit His Mistakes for Him | Election 2008 | AlterNet

By Brent Budowsky, Consortium News. Posted July 25, 2008.

The media cover up McCain's latest egregious misstatements on Iraq.

John McCain, presumably advised by Karl Rove and definitely imitating the politics of George Bush, is now saying that Barack Obama would rather lose a war than lose an election.

This is a defamation; this is a slander; this is a lie. McCain should apologize to Obama.

This is the latest in a long list of cheap-shot, low-blow politics. McCain has learned nothing about why the American people are rejecting the Republicans and why the Republican brand has been compared to the appeal of defective dog food.

On Wednesday morning, right-wing former congressman Joe Scarborough essentially said that Keith Olbermann is "too stupid to be on television."

Here is the story, which is much more important than the rantings of former right-wing politicians who become cable television politicians.

The soon-to-be-fired, low-ratings CBS anchor Katie Couric did interviews Tuesday night with both McCain and Obama.

In the McCain interview, the candidate who makes a growing list of factual errors wrongly said the Sunni Awakening was a result of the surge. He referred to a conversation between Sunnis and then-Col. (now Gen.) McFarlane that he falsely claimed resulted from the surge.

Problem is, the conversation McCain quoted happened long before the surge.

The Sunni Awakening happened many months before the surge. In fact, Sunni leaders approached the U.S. military more than a year before the surge, but were rebuffed.

In short, the Sunni Awakening happened well before the surge, had zero to do with the surge, and McCain had his facts (again) completely wrong.

Enter Ms. Couric, who used the McCain interview on the evening news, but edited out the McCain misstatement. Enter Olbermann, who did what is far too rare in cable political news: real reporting. He pointed out and documented the latest McCain mistake.

Of course, this was too much for Scarborough, who foamed at the mouth, did not intelligently discuss the McCain misstatement or the Couric protection of McCain when she kept his mistake out of the broadcast.

No, Scarborough said that the issue had been raised by others on MSNBC, and that anyone who raised it (referring to Olbermann) is too stupid to be on television (his phrase).

Mika Brzezinski, who knows better, made a face but said nothing.

Harold Ford, the voice of the Democratic Leadership Council, who never met a camera he didn't like, simply smiled his television smile and smoothly agreed with Scarborough's cheap shot at Olbermann. Ford then, as ever, referred to how close to Obama he wants to appear. (With friends like these ... )

For now, two points:

First, McCain repeatedly lowers the quality of discourse in American politics. The man who ran in 2000 has disappeared; the face of Bush 44 has taken his place with these Rove-like low blows. It is McCain who has always been the fair-haired boy of the press.

Second, John McCain has made a long series of substantial factual errors that will become a major issue. Whether the problem is age or sloppiness, partisanship or tiredness, on issue after issue McCain says things that are factually incorrect.

Couric protected McCain by editing out his latest and very substantial factual error, gaffe, falsehood or mistake (call it what you will).

Scarborough works to protect McCain by demeaning Olbermann, the messenger, who should be praised for doing real reporting (heaven forbid).

McCain's Rove-like attacks -- and his serious and repeated factual errors on major issues -- should be major topics in the election and staying silent about them does our political discourse no good.

medicineman · #2 07-25-2008, 01:34 PM

Olberman is the only factual news pundit on MSM. I doubt he'll get his contract renewed. They don't want truth coming out. We may even see him removed before the election. I once thought Scarburough to be fairly honest, as honest as one can be on the right when there are so many liars. I know he was a Republican representative, but he's taken to going over the top on right sided issues. The fact that he dumped on Olberman, his cohort at MSNBC may be a story in the making.

ViRedd · #3 07-26-2008, 05:43 PM

From the article:

"McCain has learned nothing about why the American people are rejecting the Republicans and why the Republican brand has been compared to the appeal of defective dog food."

Its the author, Brent Budowsky, who hasn't a clue as to why "people" are rejecting the Republican Party. Its not just people, its CONSERVATIVE people who are rejecting the Republican Party, because the Republican Party has lost it's conservative principles of lower taxes, less regulation and a smaller, less intrusive government. Now that they've lost both houses, and stand, at this point, a fifty-fifty chance of losing the White House as well, perhaps the power brokers in the party will wake up and smell the coffee.

And to further comment on the article ... we all know that the media hasn't had their noses up O'Bama's ass, don't we?

Vi

medicineman · #4 07-27-2008, 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ViRedd

From the article:

"McCain has learned nothing about why the American people are rejecting the Republicans and why the Republican brand has been compared to the appeal of defective dog food."

Its the author, Brent Budowsky, who hasn't a clue as to why "people" are rejecting the Republican Party. Its not just people, its CONSERVATIVE people who are rejecting the Republican Party, because the Republican Party has lost it's conservative principles of lower taxes, less regulation and a smaller, less intrusive government. Now that they've lost both houses, and stand, at this point, a fifty-fifty chance of losing the White House as well, perhaps the power brokers in the party will wake up and smell the coffee.

And to further comment on the article ... we all know that the media hasn't had their noses up O'Bama's ass, don't we?

Vi

It seems that Obama is the more personable of the two,~LOL~. Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran.

ViRedd · #5 07-27-2008, 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by medicineman

It seems that Obama is the more personable of the two,~LOL~. Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran.

There's no doubt about Obama's persona. Its truly great. He's articulate, intelligent, well spoken, charismatic ... he has the whole ball of wax.

His collectivist ideas suck though. When a politician starts preaching a mantra that suggests that individuals start sacrificing "for the greater good of society," start worrying about your liberty, Med.

Vi

Forum	Shop	Market		Seeds	FAQ	Tools
SEE OUR MARIJUANA SEED GUIDE FOR THE BEST STRAINS				Looking for Legal Marijuana look no further!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
edit	Purplecheeser	Subcool's Old School Organics	1	04-14-2008 02:01 PM
How do you edit your posts?	Fake Plastic Trees	Newbie Central	2	10-20-2007 02:16 AM
How to edit your profile	nongreenthumb	Support	6	08-24-2007 10:34 PM
can't edit posts	catgirl	Support	6	05-28-2007 10:55 AM
Spell checker?	Widow Maker	Make Your Requests	5	03-04-2007 04:29 AM

User Name		Remember Me?
Password

SEE OUR MARIJUANA SEED GUIDE FOR THE BEST STRAINS

Looking for Legal Marijuana look no further!

Thread

Thread Starter

Forum

Replies

Last Post

Posting Rules